Cited by 38Sports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The Effects of Short-Cycle Sprints on Power, Strength, and Salivary Hormones in Elite Rugby Players

Crewther, Blair T, Cook, Christian J, Lowe, Tim E, Weatherby, Robert P, Gill, Nicholas·2011·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

This study examined the effects of short-cycle sprints on power, strength, and salivary hormones in elite rugby players. Thirty male rugby players performed an upper-body power and lower-body strength (UPLS) and/or a lower-body power and upper-body strength (LPUS) workout using a crossover design (sprint vs. control). A 40-second upper-body or lower-body cycle sprint was performed before the UPLS and LPUS workouts, respectively, with the control sessions performed without the sprints. Bench throw (BT) power and box squat (BS) 1 repetition maximum (1RM) strength were assessed in the UPLS workout, and squat jump (SJ) power and bench press (BP) 1RM strength were assessed in the LPUS workout. Saliva was collected across each workout and assayed for testosterone (Sal-T) and cortisol (Sal-C). The cycle sprints improved BS (2.6 ± 1.2%) and BP (2.8 ± 1.0%) 1RM but did not affect BT and SJ power. The lower-body cycle sprint produced a favorable environment for the BS by elevating Sal-T concentrations. The upper-body cycle sprint had no hormonal effect, but the workout differences (%) in Sal-T (r = -0.59) and Sal-C (r = 0.42) concentrations correlated to the BP, along with the Sal-T/C ratio (r = -0.49 to -0.66). In conclusion, the cycle sprints improved the BP and BS 1RM strength of elite rugby players but not power output in the current format. The improvements noted may be explained, in part, by the changes in absolute or relative hormone concentrations. These findings have practical implications for prescribing warm-up and training exercises.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181b6045c

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crewther, B. T., Cook, C. J., Lowe, T. E., Weatherby, R. P., & Gill, N.
Affiliations
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Crewther, Blair T
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2011-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
32-39
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965170607
Cited by
38
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H009744/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
rugby players, power training, resistance training, salivary testosterone, salivary cortisol, testosterone/cortisol ratio, 1RM strength, bench press, squat jump, warm-up, elite athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Football, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Saliva, Testosterone, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies, Muscle Strength, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review