Cited by 74Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Postexercise hypertrophic adaptations: A reexamination of the hormone hypothesis and its applicability to resistance training program design

Schoenfeld, Brad J.·2013·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

It has been well documented in the literature that resistance training can promote marked increases in skeletal muscle mass. Postexercise hypertrophic adaptations are mediated by a complex enzymatic cascade whereby mechanical tension is molecularly transduced into anabolic and catabolic signals that ultimately lead to a compensatory response, shifting muscle protein balance to favor synthesis over degradation. Myocellular signaling is influenced, in part, by the endocrine system. Various hormones have been shown to alter the dynamic balance between anabolic and catabolic stimuli in muscle, helping to mediate an increase or decrease in muscle protein accretion. Resistance training can have an acute impact on the postexercise secretion of several of these hormones including insulin-like growth factor, testosterone, and growth hormone (GH). Studies show that hormonal spikes are magnified after hypertrophy-type exercise that involves training at moderate intensities with shortened rest intervals as compared with high-intensity strength-oriented training. The observed positive relationship between anabolic hormones and hypertrophy-type training has led to the hormone hypothesis, which postulates that acute postexercise hormonal secretions mediate increases in muscle size. Several researchers have suggested that these transient hormonal elevations may be more critical to hypertrophic adaptations than chronic changes in resting hormonal concentrations. Theoretically, high levels of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31828ddd53

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoenfeld, B. J.
Affiliations
Lehman College (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2013-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1720-1730
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083668808
Cited by
74
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
muscle hypertrophy, resistance training, insulin-like growth factor, testosterone, growth hormone, muscle protein synthesis, muscle protein degradation, supercompensation, mechanical tension, rest periods, exercise intensity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Humans, Hypertrophy, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Testosterone, Signal Transduction, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Human Growth Hormone, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review