Cited by 169Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

Reliability and Validity of the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (Best): A Self-Rated Scale to Measure Severity and Change in Persons With Borderline Personality Disorder

Open access
Pfohl, Bruce, Blum, Nancee, St. John, Don, McCormick, Brett, Allen, Jeff, Black, Donald W.·2009·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

A new self-rated scale to measure severity and change in persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD) is described. The Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST) was developed to rate the thoughts, emotions, and behaviors typical of BPD. Data were collected in the course of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for subjects with BPD. The instrument showed moderate test-retest reliability, high internal consistency, and high discriminant validity. Its 15 separate items showed a moderate or better correlation with the total score. The BEST was also sensitive to clinical change as early as week 4 of the RCT and correlated highly with other measures of illness severity. We conclude that the new scale is both reliable and valid in measuring severity and change in persons with BPD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.3.281

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 1995 The struc- tured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II), I: De- scription Journal of Personality Disorders 9 83 91
  2. Pfohl B Blum N Zimmerman M 1997 Structured interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (SIDP-IV) Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfohl, B., Blum, N., St. John, D., McCormick, B., Allen, J., & Black, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2009-06
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
281-293
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070419405
Cited by
169
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063746, MH-63746)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, self-report scale, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, discriminant validity, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Borderline Personality Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Suicide, Attempted, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review