Cited by 84Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPersonality Traits and Psychology

A Laboratory-Based Examination of Responses to Social Rejection in Borderline Personality Disorder: The Mediating Role of Emotion Dysregulation

Gratz, Kim L., Dixon-Gordon, Katherine L., Breetz, Alisa, Tull, Matthew·2013·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

This study sought to build upon existing research on interpersonal sensitivity in borderline personality disorder (BPD) by examining whether emotion dysregulation mediates the relationship between BPD and cognitive and emotional responses to social rejection. Participants with (n = 53) and without (n = 34) BPD reported on levels of negative affect and threat to four social needs (perceived control, belonging, selfesteem, and meaningful existence) in response to a laboratory-based social ostracism task (Cyberball). Results revealed heightened interpersonal (rejection) sensitivity among BPD (vs. non-BPD) participants, as evidenced by heightened threat to all social needs and nonspecific distress (although not overall negative affect) in response to the task. Furthermore, both overall emotion dysregulation and the specific dimensions involving emotion modulation strategies, emotional clarity, and the control of behaviors when distressed mediated the relationship between BPD status and several cognitive (threats to meaningful existence, belonging, and self-esteem) and emotional (nonspecific distress) responses to the task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.2.157

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with Borderline Personality Disorder are hypersensitive to social exclusion.

    “Finally, research indicates that people with BPD are hypersensitive to social exclusion (Domes et al., 2008;Gratz, Dixon-Gordon, Breetz, & Tull, 2013;Renneberg et al., 2012), which may be explained by the cognitiveaffective processing bias proposed in RS.”

    From The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Gratz, Dixon-Gordon, Breetz, & Tull, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gratz, K. L., Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Breetz, A., & Tull, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • American University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2013-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
157-171
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172169029
Cited by
84
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, social rejection, interpersonal sensitivity, emotional dysregulation, ostracism, Cyberball, negative affect, emotional clarity, self-esteem, sense of belonging, meaningful life, perceived control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Self Concept, Psychological Distance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review