Cited by 182Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Complex PTSD, affect dysregulation, and borderline personality disorder

Open access
Ford, Julian D, Courtois, Christine A·2014·Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

Abstract

Complex PTSD (cPTSD) was formulated to include, in addition to the core PTSD symptoms, dysregulation in three psychobiological areas: (1) emotion processing, (2) self-organization (including bodily integrity), and (3) relational security. The overlap of diagnostic criteria for cPTSD and borderline personality disorder (BPD) raises questions about the scientific integrity and clinical utility of the cPTSD construct/diagnosis, as well as opportunities to achieve an increasingly nuanced understanding of the role of psychological trauma in BPD. We review clinical and scientific findings regarding comorbidity, clinical phenomenology and neurobiology of BPD, PTSD, and cPTSD, and the role of traumatic victimization (in general and specific to primary caregivers), dissociation, and affect dysregulation. Findings suggest that BPD may involve heterogeneity related to psychological trauma that includes, but extends beyond, comorbidity with PTSD and potentially involves childhood victimization-related dissociation and affect dysregulation consistent with cPTSD. Although BPD and cPTSD overlap substantially, it is unwarranted to conceptualize cPTSD either as a replacement for BPD, or simply as a sub-type of BPD. We conclude with implications for clinical practice and scientific research based on a better differentiated view of cPTSD, BPD and PTSD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2051-6673-1-9

Cites

226 of 227 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Duckworth T Follette V Retraumatization 2012 New York Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, J. D., & Courtois, C. A.
Venue
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
Published
2014
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
9
ISSN
2051-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161813267
Cited by
182
References
225
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
complex PTSD, borderline personality disorder, affect dysregulation, post-traumatic stress disorder, comorbidities, dissociation, childhood trauma, primary caregivers, emotional processing, self-organization, relational security, diagnostic validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review