Cited by 344Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues

Open access
Berenson, Kathy R., Gyurak, Anett, Ayduk, Özlem, Downey, Geraldine, Garner, Matthew J., Mogg, Karin, Bradley, Brendan P., Pine, Daniel S.·2009·Journal of Research in Personality

Abstract

Two studies tested the hypothesis that Rejection Sensitivity (RS) increases vulnerability to disruption of attention by social threat cues, as would be consistent with prior evidence that it motivates individuals to prioritize detecting and managing potential rejection at a cost to other personal and interpersonal goals. In Study 1, RS predicted disruption of ongoing goal-directed attention by social threat but not negative words in an Emotional Stroop task. In Study 2, RS predicted attentional avoidance of threatening but not pleasant faces in a Visual Probe task. Threat-avoidant attention was also associated with features of borderline personality disorder. This research extends understanding of processes by which RS contributes to a self-perpetuating cycle of interpersonal problems and distress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.07.007

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ayduk O Gyurak A Cognitive inhibitory control as a buffer against rejection sensitivity Proceedings volume of the 1st International Congress on Interpersonal Acceptance and Rejection 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berenson, K. R., Gyurak, A., Ayduk, Ö., Downey, G., Garner, M. J., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Pine, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Corresponding author
Berenson, Kathy R.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
1064-1072
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096784304
Cited by
344
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020006-19)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020006), R01MH069703, R01MH081948)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
rejection sensitivity, attentional disruption, attentional avoidance, borderline personality disorder, interpersonal rejection, emotional Stroop task, visual probe task, top-down attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review