Cited by 72Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEthics in Clinical ResearchQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

The effect of participating in suicide research: does participating in a research protocol on suicide and psychiatric symptoms increase suicide ideation and attempts?

Open access
Smith, Phillip, Poindexter, Erin, Cukrowicz, Kelly·2010·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

The effect of engaging in an intensive research protocol that inquired extensively about psychiatric and suicide symptoms and exposed participants to a number of images, including suicide-related content was explored. Individuals experiencing a major depressive episode were called at 1 and 3 months after the initial protocol. Participants were asked about changes in suicide ideation and the occurrence of self-harm or suicide attempts following participation. Participants reported experiencing reductions in suicide ideation at the first follow-up and no changes at the second follow-up. No participant reported having engaged in self-harm or having attempted suicide at either follow-up. Results suggest that basic science/nontreatment research can be conducted safely with suicidal participants and in a manner that does not increase suicide symptoms or suicide risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/suli.2010.40.6.535

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, P., Poindexter, E., & Cukrowicz, K.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-01
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
535-543
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2149788557
Cited by
72
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020061-25)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32-MH020061)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, self-harm, major depressive episode, psychiatric symptoms, research safety, suicide risk, follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Chi-Square Distribution, Behavioral Research, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review