Cited by 108Mental Health Research TopicsSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health via Writing

Ecological momentary assessment is a neglected methodology in suicidology

Davidson, Collin L., Anestis, Michael D., Gutierrez, Peter M.·2017·Archives of Suicide Research

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a group of research methods that collect data frequently, in many contexts, and in real-world settings. EMA has been fairly neglected in suicidology. The current article provides an overview of EMA for suicidologists including definitions, data collection considerations, and different sampling strategies. Next, the benefits of EMA in suicidology (i.e., reduced recall bias, accurate tracking of fluctuating variables, testing assumptions of theories, use in interventions), participant safety considerations, and examples of published research that investigate self-directed violence variables using EMA are discussed. The article concludes with a summary and suggested directions for EMA research in suicidology with the particular aim to spur the increased use of this methodology among suicidologists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13811118.2015.1004482

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, C. L., Anestis, M. D., & Gutierrez, P. M.
Corresponding author
Davidson, Collin L.
Venue
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1381-1118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-6136
OpenAlex
W2328844752
Cited by
108
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Suicide Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, suicidology, self-directed violence, recall bias, sampling strategy, participant safety, real-world data collection, suicide intervention
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Data Collection, Humans, Research Design, Suicide, Self-Injurious Behavior, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review