Cited by 125Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Autonomous CaMKII can promote either long-term potentiation or long-term depression, depending on the state of T305/T306 phosphorylation

Open access
Pi, H. J., Otmakhov, N., Lemelin, D., De Koninck, P., Lisman, J.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) is a key mediator of long-term potentiation (LTP). Whereas acute intracellular injection of catalytically active CaMKII fragments saturates LTP (Lledo et al., 1995), an autonomously active form (T286D) of CaMKII holoenzyme expressed in transgenic mice did not saturate potentiation (Mayford et al., 1995). To better understand the role of the holoenzyme in the control of synaptic strength, we transfected hippocampal neurons with constructs encoding forms of CaMKII mimicking different phosphorylation states. Surprisingly, T286D not only failed to potentiate synaptic strength, but produced synaptic depression through an long-term depression (LTD)-like process. T305/T306 phosphorylation was critical for this depression because overexpression of the pseudophosphorylated form (T286D/T305D/T306D) caused depression that occluded LTD, and overexpression of an autonomous form in which T305/T306 could not be phosphorylated (T286D/T305A/T306A) prevented LTD (instead producing potentiation). Therefore, autonomous CaMKII can lead to either LTP or LTD, depending on the phosphorylation state of the control point, T305/T306.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0133-10.2010

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a T286D mutation alone is problematic because it generates a constitutively active kinase that then results in phosphorylation of T305/T306, which can counteract T286D and alter resident time at the synapse.

    “Just using a T286D mutation would be problematic because it generates a constitutively active kinase that then results in the phosphorylation of T305/T306, which can counteract T286D and alter resident time at the synapse (88, 210, 211).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [210]

    The Results describe T286D as an active form of CaMKII and hypothesize that it might autophosphorylate T305/T306; they do not establish that this phosphorylation necessarily occurs. The Results and Discussion show that T305/T306 phosphorylation can counteract T286D-associated potentiation, and the Discussion says it reduces binding to the postsynaptic density. The paper does not report a change in residence time at the synapse (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Overexpressing constitutively active CaMKII promotes plasticity.

    “This outcome would be consistent with our results showing enhanced excitatory signaling to D2-MSNs following stress and other results showing overexpression of a constitutively active CaMKII promotes plasticity (89), while developmental inhibition of CaMKII reduces functional numbers of synapses (90).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pi, H. J., Otmakhov, N., Lemelin, D., De Koninck, P., & Lisman, J.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Lisman, J.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
30
Issue
26
Pages
8704-8709
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2094501373
Cited by
125
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS050944, R01NS027337)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
CaMKII, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, holoenzyme, synaptic plasticity, hippocampal neurons, phosphorylation state, synaptic depression
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Hippocampus, Mutation, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Synapses, Time Factors, Transfection, Long-Term Potentiation, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Holoenzymes, Long-Term Synaptic Depression, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review