Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Glia are a unique substrate for the in vitro growth of central nervous system neurons

Open access
Noble, M, Fok-Seang, J, Cohen, J·1984·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We have examined the consequences of surface interactions with glial and nonglial cells on the in vitro growth of CNS neurons. When cerebellar or spinal cord cells were plated onto monolayers highly enriched in cortical astrocytes or sciatic nerve Schwann cells, neurons generally grew as single cells and showed relatively little tendency to aggregate. Similarly, neurites showed little tendency to fasciculate. In contrast, when plated onto fibroblast, heart muscle-fibroblast, or astrocyte-free meningeal monolayers, neurons rapidly aggregated, and neurite outgrowth was primarily in large fascicles. There were no glia detectable in the majority of aggregates or fascicles, suggesting that aggregation and fasciculation were due to interactions between neurons. Neurite outgrowth over 24 hr was also greater on astrocytes than on nonglia. Whether or not aggregation and fasciculation occurred was due to surface properties of the glial and nonglial cells. When neurons were added to astrocyte and nonglial monolayers growing in medium conditioned by a large excess of co-cultured nonglia or astrocytes, respectively, the pattern of neuronal growth was determined by the type of monolayer with which the neurons were in contact. Moreover, the initial growth of neurons on heat-killed astrocytes was indistinguishable from growth on living astrocytes. The pattern of neuronal growth on these different monolayers suggests that neurons are more adherent to glia than to other neurons but are more adherent to other neurons than to nonglia. Such an adherence hierarchy could explain the consistent finding of an apposition of neurons to glial surfaces during neuronal migration and axon outgrowth. Our findings also suggest that the interaction of axons with the non-neuronal milieu through which they grow may play an important role in regulating fasciculation, a process which has generally been treated as due primarily to axon-axon interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.04-07-01892.1984

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Noble, M., Fok-Seang, J., & Cohen, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1984-07-01
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
1892-1903
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2098881993
Cited by
420
References
32
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glia are a unique substrate for the in vitro growth of central nervous system neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.04-07-01892.1984
The paper
Noble, M., Fok-Seang, J., & Cohen, J. (1984). Glia are a unique substrate for the in vitro growth of central nervous system neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.04-07-01892.1984

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.