The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurophysiology of Implicit Timing in Serial Choice Reaction-Time Performance
Open accessAbstract
Neural representations of time for the judgment of temporal durations are reflected in electroencephalographic (EEG) slow brain potentials, as established in time production and perception tasks. Here, we investigated whether anticipatory processes in reaction-time procedures are governed by similar mechanisms of interval timing. We used a choice reaction task with two different, temporally regular stimulus presentation regimes, both with occasional deviant interstimulus intervals. Temporal preparation was shown in the form of adjustments in time course of slow brain potentials, such that they reached their maximum amplitude just before a new trial, independent of the duration of the interstimulus interval. Preparation was focused on a brief time window, demonstrated by a drop in amplitude of slow potentials as the standard interval had elapsed in deviant interstimulus intervals. Implicit timing influencing perceptual processing was shown in reduced visual-evoked responses to delayed stimuli after a deviant interstimulus interval and in a reduction of EEG α power over the visual cortex at the time when the standard interval had elapsed. In contrast to explicit timing tasks, the slow brain potential manifestations of implicit timing originated in the lateral instead of the medial premotor cortex. Together, the results show that temporal regularities set up a narrow time window of motor and sensory attention, demonstrating the operation of interval timing in reaction time performance. The divergence in slow brain potential distribution between implicit and explicit timing tasks suggests that interval timing for different behaviors relies on qualitatively similar mechanisms implemented in distinct cortical substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts
Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90094-9 · Cited by 696
Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation
Coull, J. T., Vidal, F., Nazarian, B., & Macar, F. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091573 · Cited by 642 · cited 2×
“Parietal activation associated with timing is more frequently found in the inferior parietal cortex (Coull et al., 2004), consistent with a sensitivity to elapsed time of the lateral intraparietal cortex in the macaque (Janssen and Shadlen, 2005).”
A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP
Janssen, P., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1386 · Cited by 601
Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention
Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00474 · Cited by 501
Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention
Doherty, J. R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M. M., & Nobre, A. C. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1821-05.2005 · Cited by 357
Cited by
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection
Schroeder, C. E., & Lakatos, P. (2009) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.012 · Cited by 1,528
Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions
Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003 · Cited by 1,114
Kononowicz, T. W., van Rijn, H., & Meck, W. H. (2018) · Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn114 · Cited by 756
Prediction, cognition and the brain
Bubic (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025 · Cited by 647
Metadata
- Authors
- Praamstra, P., Kourtis, D., Fei Kwok, H., & Oostenveld, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-05-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5448-5455
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2022641510
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurophysiology of Implicit Timing in Serial Choice Reaction-Time Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.0440-06.2006
- The paper
- Praamstra, P., Kourtis, D., Fei Kwok, H., & Oostenveld, R. (2006). Neurophysiology of Implicit Timing in Serial Choice Reaction-Time Performance. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0440-06.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.