The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Longitudinal topography and interdigitation of corticostriatal projections in the rhesus monkey
Open accessAbstract
Anterograde tracing methods were used to examine the topographic organization and interrelationship of projections to the neostriatum arising from various areas of association cortex. In contrast to the currently accepted topographic schema, all cortical areas examined project to longitudinal territories that occupy restricted medial- lateral domains of the neostriatum. The posterior parietal and superior arcuate cortices project to dorsolateral portions of the neostriatum; the dorsolateral and dorsomedial frontal cortices project centrally; and the orbitofrontal, anterior cingulate, and superior temporal projections are distributed to ventromedial regions of the caudate nucleus and putamen. In coronal section, cortical terminal fields form a diagonal strip, extending from the dorsal, ventricular border of the caudate nucleus, through the fiber bundles of the internal capsule, to the ventral margin of the putamen. Double labeling studies, in which two cortical areas were injected in the same animal, indicated that convergence of input within neostriatal domains is not governed by reciprocity of corticocortical connectivity. Thus, the interrelationship of projections arising from connectionally linked cortical areas ranged from nearly complete segregation of terminal fields (e.g., from dorsolateral prefrontal and orbital cortices) to extensive overlap of terminal domains (e.g., from frontal and temporal cortices). In the latter case, detailed analysis revealed that frontal and temporal terminals actually were interdigitated rather than intermixed within the zone of overlap. The present findings suggest a new conceptualization of corticostriatal topography in the primate which emphasizes the longitudinal arrangement of cortical terminal domains. Additionally, these findings provide a map for functional parcellation of the neostriatum on the basis of its cortical innervation which may prove useful to understanding normal striatal function, as well as the symptomatology associated with neostriatal injury and disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–113 of 113
Striatal structure and function in mood disorders: a comprehensive review
Marchand, W. R., & Yurgelun‐Todd, D. (2010) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00874.x · Cited by 91
An anterior-posterior gradient of cognitive control within the dorsomedial striatum
Mestres-Missé, A., Turner, R., & Friederici, A. D. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.021 · Cited by 91
Gerfen, C. R. (2004) · The Rat Nervous System · doi:10.1016/b978-012547638-6/50019-5 · Cited by 85
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2020) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107327 · Cited by 75
Local and long-distance organization of prefrontal cortex circuits in the marmoset brain
Watakabe, A., Skibbe, H., Nakae, K., Abe, H., Ichinohe, N., Rachmadi, M. F., Wang, J., Takaji, M., Mizukami, H., Woodward, A., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.028 · Cited by 64
Connections of the human orbitofrontal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus
Heather Hsu, C.-C., Rolls, E. T., Huang, C.-C., Chong, S. T., Zac Lo, C.-Y., Feng, J., & Lin, C.-P. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa160 · Cited by 67
Adeno-associated virus type 6 is retrogradely transported in the non-human primate brain
San Sebastian, W., Samaranch, L., Heller, G., Kells, A. P., Bringas, J., Pivirotto, P., Forsayeth, J., & Bankiewicz, K. S. (2013) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/gt.2013.48 · Cited by 62
Stimulus-response and response-outcome learning mechanisms in the striatum
Horvitz, J. C. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.014 · Cited by 58
Gerbella, M., Borra, E., Mangiaracina, C., Rozzi, S., & Luppino, G. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv135 · Cited by 43
Imbalanced sensitivities to primary and secondary rewards in internet gaming disorder
(2021) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2021.00072 · Cited by 44
Remembering forward: Neural correlates of memory and prediction in human motor adaptation
Scheidt, R. A., Zimbelman, J. L., Salowitz, N. M. G., Suminski, A. J., Mosier, K. M., Houk, J., & Simo, L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.072 · Cited by 42
Mechanisms for the Approach/Avoidance Decision Applied to Autism
Pfaff, D., & Barbas, H. (2019) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2019.05.002 · Cited by 26
Symmetry in frontal but not motor and somatosensory cortical projections
Papale, A. E., Harish, M., Paletzki, R. F., O’Connor, N. J., Eastwood, B. S., Seal, R. P., Williamson, R. S., Gerfen, C. R., & Hooks, B. M. (2024) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1195-23.2024 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Selemon, L., & Goldman-Rakic, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1985-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 776-794
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1806855318
- Cited by
- 1,073
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.