Cited by 630Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchS100 Proteins and Annexins

Regional distribution of type II Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in rat brain

Open access
Erondu, NE, Kennedy, MB·1985·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The distribution of type II Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase has been mapped in rat brain by immunochemical and immunohistochemical methods using an antibody against its alpha-subunit. The concentration of the kinase, measured by radioimmunoassay, varies markedly in different brain regions. It is most highly concentrated in the telencephalon where it comprises approximately 2% of the total hippocampal protein, 1.3% of cortical protein, and 0.7% of striatal protein. It is less concentrated in lower brain structures, ranging from about 0.3% of hypothalamic protein to 0.1% of protein in the pons/medulla. The gradient of staining intensity observed in brain sections by immunohistochemistry corroborates this distribution. Neurons and neuropil of the hippocampus are densely stained, whereas little staining is observed in lower brain regions such as the superior colliculus. Within the diencephalon and midbrain, dense staining is observed only in thalamic nuclei and the substantia nigra. The skewed distribution of alpha-subunit appears to be due in part to the occurrence in the cerebellum and pons/medulla of forms of the kinase with a high ratio of beta- to alpha-subunits. However, most of the variation is due to the extremely high concentration of the kinase in particular neurons, especially those of the hippocampus, cortex and striatum. The unusually high expression of the kinase in these neurons is likely to confer upon them specialized responses to calcium ion that are different from those of neurons in lower brain regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.05-12-03270.1985

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CaMKII is present in the brain at extraordinarily high levels, rivaling the levels of cytoskeletal proteins.

    “Second, it is present in the brain at extraordinarily high levels, rivaling the levels of cytoskeletal proteins (63–67), suggesting that CaMKII may play a structural role (27, 68).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Discussion reports that CaMKII reaches 1–2% of total protein in some neurons and calls that level unusual. It compares this abundance with structural proteins, but gives substantially higher levels for tubulin (about 10%) and actin (about 7%); “rivaling” their levels overstates the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fulton, C.. and P. A. Simpson (1979) Tubulin ~001s. synthesis and utilization. In Microtubules, K. Roberts and J. S. Hyams, eds:, pp. 117-l 74, Academic Press, Inc., New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erondu, N., & Kennedy, M.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1985-12-01
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
3270-3277
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1659153222
Cited by
630
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Gustavus and Louise Pfeiffer Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-17660)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › S100 Proteins and Annexins
Keywords
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, regional distribution, rat brain, alpha subunit, hippocampus, cerebral cortex, striatum, telencephalon, thalamus, substantia nigra, cerebellum, pons-medulla, calcium signaling, neuronal expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Female, Histocytochemistry, Immunochemistry, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Protein Kinases, Radioimmunoassay, Rats, Inbred Strains, Tissue Distribution, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review