The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Control of Postsynaptic Density Scaffolds via Actin-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
Organization and dynamic remodeling of postsynaptic density (PSD) are thought to be critical in postsynaptic signal transduction, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are not well understood. We show here that four major scaffolding molecules, PSD-95, GKAP, Shank, and PSD-Zip45, show distinct instability in total molecular content per synapse. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching also confirmed their distinct turnover rates. Among the PSD molecules examined, PSD-95 was most stable, but its elimination did not influence the dynamics of its direct binding partner GKAP. Multiple interactions of scaffolding molecules with the actin cytoskeleton have suggested their importance in both maintenance and remodeling of the PSD. Indeed, acute pharmacological disruption of F-actin rapidly eliminated the dynamic fraction of GKAP, Shank, and PSD-Zip45, without changing synaptic localization of PSD-95. GKAP content in synapses increased after pharmacological enhancement of neuronal activity, whereas Shank and PSD-Zip45 content showed reduction. Inhibition of F-actin dynamics prevented activity-dependent redistribution of all three scaffolds. We also assessed involvement of glutamate receptors in the regulation of PSD dynamics. Genetic manipulations eliminating either NMDA receptors or metabotropic glutamate receptors did not primarily influence mobility of their binding scaffolds. These results collectively indicate a critical role of filamentous actin in determining the extent of dynamic reorganization in PSD molecular composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines
Matsuzaki, M., Honkura, N., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., & Kasai, H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02617 · Cited by 2,483
Extrasynaptic NMDARs oppose synaptic NMDARs by triggering CREB shut-off and cell death pathways
Hardingham, G. E., Fukunaga, Y., & Bading, H. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn835 · Cited by 1,686
PSD-95 Involvement in Maturation of Excitatory Synapses
El-Husseini, A. E.-D., Schnell, E., Chetkovich, D. M., Nicoll, R. A., & Bredt, D. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5495.1364 · Cited by 1,303
Naisbitt, S., Kim, E., Tu, J. C., Xiao, B., Sala, C., Valtschanoff, J., Weinberg, R. J., Worley, P. F., & Sheng, M. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80809-0 · Cited by 1,009
Rapid Actin-Based Plasticity in Dendritic Spines
Fischer, M., Kaech, S., Knutti, D., & Matus, A. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80467-5 · Cited by 905
Okamoto, K.-I., Nagai, T., Miyawaki, A., & Hayashi, Y. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1311 · Cited by 854
Actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines
Matus, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5492.754 · Cited by 815
Competitive binding of α-actinin and calmodulin to the NMDA receptor
Wyszynski, M., Lin, J., Rao, A., Nigh, E., Beggs, A. H., Craig, A. M., & Sheng, M. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385439a0 · Cited by 596
Regulation of F-Actin Stability in Dendritic Spines by Glutamate Receptors and Calcineurin
Halpain, S., Hipolito, A., & Saffer, L. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-23-09835.1998 · Cited by 408 · cited 1×
“Multiple forms of actin reorganization can be induced by different stimulation protocols (Halpain et al., 1998; Colicos et al., 2001; Furuyashiki et al., 2002).”
BackgroundStein, V., House, D. R. C., Bredt, D. S., & Nicoll, R. A. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-13-05503.2003 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Actin in action: the interplay between the actin cytoskeleton and synaptic efficacy.
Cingolani, L. A., & Goda, Y. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2373 · Cited by 831
Actin in dendritic spines: connecting dynamics to function
Hotulainen, P., & Hoogenraad, C. C. (2010) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201003008 · Cited by 815
Structural and Molecular Remodeling of Dendritic Spine Substructures during Long-Term Potentiation
Bosch, M., Castro, J., Saneyoshi, T., Matsuno, H., Sur, M., & Hayashi, Y. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.021 · Cited by 637
The Postsynaptic Organization of Synapses
Sheng, M., & Kim, E. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005678 · Cited by 603
Nanoscale Scaffolding Domains within the Postsynaptic Density Concentrate Synaptic AMPA Receptors
MacGillavry, H. D., Song, Y., Raghavachari, S., & Blanpied, T. A. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.009 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuriu, T., Inoue, A., Bito, H., Sobue, K., & Okabe, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-07-19
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 7693-7706
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2014301723
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Control of Postsynaptic Density Scaffolds via Actin-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.0522-06.2006
- The paper
- Kuriu, T., Inoue, A., Bito, H., Sobue, K., & Okabe, S. (2006). Differential Control of Postsynaptic Density Scaffolds via Actin-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0522-06.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.