Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local circuitry of identified projection neurons in cat visual cortex brain slices

Open access
Katz, LC·1987·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The relationship between pyramidal cell morphology and efferent target was investigated in layer 6 of cat primary visual cortex (area 17). Layer 6 has 2 projections, one to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and another to the visual claustrum. The cells of origin of each projection were identified by retrograde transport of fluorescent latex microspheres. The labeled cells were visualized in brain slices prepared from area 17, using an epifluorescence compound microscope modified for intracellular recording. Individual retrogradely labeled cells were penetrated and intracellularly stained with Lucifer yellow to visualize the patterns of axons and dendrites associated with each projection. The neurons that give rise to the 2 projections had very different patterns of dendrites and local axonal collaterals, but the patterns within each group were highly stereotyped. The differences between their axonal collaterals were particularly dramatic. Claustrum projecting cells had fine, horizontally directed collaterals that arborized exclusively in layer 6 and lower layer 5. Most LGN projecting cells had virtually no horizontal arborization in layer 6. Instead, they sent widespread collaterals vertically, which arborized extensively in layer 4. The apical dendrites of the 2 groups also differed markedly. Claustrum projecting cells had apical dendrites reaching to layer 1, with branches in layer 5 only, while LGN projecting cells never had an apical dendrite reaching higher than layer 3, with side branches in layers 5 and 4. Therefore, each efferent target must receive inputs from neurons whose synaptic connections within area 17 are significantly different from those of neurons projecting to other targets. This further suggests that distinct visual response properties should be associated with each projection. In addition to the claustrum and LGN projecting cells, about 20% of layer 6 pyramidal neurons lacked an efferent axon. Morphologically, most resembled LGN projecting neurons, but a few had characteristics of claustrum projecting cells. These neurons may represent cells that either failed to make an efferent connection or cells that lost an efferent axon during development. Their frequency suggests that such intrinsic, presumably excitatory, neurons may play a significant role in cortical processing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.07-04-01223.1987

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Katz, L.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1987-04-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
1223-1249
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1780057589
Cited by
359
References
6
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local circuitry of identified projection neurons in cat visual cortex brain slices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.07-04-01223.1987
The paper
Katz, L. (1987). Local circuitry of identified projection neurons in cat visual cortex brain slices. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.07-04-01223.1987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.