Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conditional Deletion of Prnp Rescues Behavioral and Synaptic Deficits after Disease Onset in Transgenic Alzheimer's Disease

Salazar, Santiago V., Gallardo, Christopher, Kaufman, Adam C., Herber, Charlotte S., Haas, Laura T., Robinson, Sophie, Manson, Jean C., Lee, Michael K., Strittmatter, Stephen M.·2017·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Biochemical and genetic evidence implicate soluble oligomeric amyloid-β (Aβo) in triggering Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology. Moreover, constitutive deletion of the Aβo-binding cellular prion protein (PrP C ) prevents development of memory deficits in APP swe /PS1ΔE9 mice, a model of familial AD. Here, we define the role of PrP C to rescue or halt established AD endophenotypes in a therapeutic disease-modifying time window after symptom onset. Deletion of Prnp at either 12 or 16 months of age fully reverses hippocampal synapse loss and completely rescues preexisting behavioral deficits by 17 months. In contrast, but consistent with a neuronal function for Aβo/PrP C signaling, plaque density, microgliosis, and astrocytosis are not altered. Degeneration of catecholaminergic neurons remains unchanged by PrP C reduction after disease onset. These results define the potential of targeting PrP C as a disease-modifying therapy for certain AD-related phenotypes after disease onset. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The study presented here further elucidates our understanding of the soluble oligomeric amyloid-β–Aβo-binding cellular prion protein (PrP C ) signaling pathway in a familial form of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by implicating PrP C as a potential therapeutic target for AD. In particular, genetic deletion of Prnp rescued several familial AD (FAD)-associated phenotypes after disease onset in a mouse model of FAD. This study underscores the therapeutic potential of PrP C deletion given that patients already present symptoms at the time of diagnosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0722-17.2017

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1111/jnc.13166 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.02.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6500-10.2011 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4195-09.2009 · DOI
  5. 10.1074/jbc.M110.145516 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/1471-2202-11-130 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/brain/awt375 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.066 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M112.423954 · DOI
  10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0572-14.2014 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ncomms1341 · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0395-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/brain/awv356 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1072994 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0597 · DOI
  16. Heiss, 2017, Early activation of experience-independent dendritic spine turnover in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, Cereb Cortex, 7, 3660
  17. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01077-1 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/ncomms4374 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6448 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1858-12.2012 · DOI
  21. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-08.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1694-14.2014 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.043002.094919 · DOI
  24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4251-12.2013 · DOI
  25. Mölsä, 1986, Survival and cause of death in Alzheimer's disease and multi-infarct dementia, Acta Neurol Scand, 74, 103, 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1986.tb04634.x · DOI
  26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4825-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1186/s13195-015-0110-9 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.09.030 · DOI
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4504-06.2006 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/1750-1326-7-28 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/emboj/20.4.694 · DOI
  32. 10.1074/jbc.M112.400358 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1177/002215549904700601 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.1074069 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004457 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nm1782 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1002/gene.20046 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nn.3178 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/416535a · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1034-15.2015 · DOI
  43. 10.3233/JAD-2012-120151 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salazar, S. V., Gallardo, C., Kaufman, A. C., Herber, C. S., Haas, L. T., Robinson, S., Manson, J. C., Lee, M. K., & Strittmatter, S. M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2017-08-21
Volume
37
Issue
38
Pages
9207-9221
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
55
References
15
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review