The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of Synaptic Vesicle Budding and Dynamin Function by an EHD ATPase
Abstract
Eps15 homology domain-containing proteins (EHDs) are conserved ATPases implicated in membrane remodeling. Recently, EHD1 was found to be enriched at synaptic release sites, suggesting a possible involvement in the trafficking of synaptic vesicles. We have investigated the role of an EHD1/3 ortholog (l-EHD) in the lamprey giant reticulospinal synapse. l-EHD was detected by immunogold at endocytic structures adjacent to release sites. In antibody microinjection experiments, perturbation of l-EHD inhibited synaptic vesicle endocytosis and caused accumulation of clathrin-coated pits with atypical, elongated necks. The necks were covered with helix-like material containing dynamin. To test whether l-EHD directly interferes with dynamin function, we used fluid-supported bilayers as in vitro assay. We found that l-EHD strongly inhibited vesicle budding induced by dynamin in the constant presence of GTP. l-EHD also inhibited dynamin-induced membrane tubulation in the presence of GTPγS, a phenomenon linked with dynamin helix assembly. Our in vivo results demonstrate the involvement of l-EHD in clathrin/dynamin-dependent synaptic vesicle budding. Based on our in vitro observations, we suggest that l-EHD acts to limit the formation of long, unproductive dynamin helices, thereby promoting vesicle budding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EHD1 catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane.
“Recent studies suggest that a dynamin-homolog, Eps15 homology domain protein 1, catalyzes fission and releases endosome-derived vesicles for recycling to the plasma membrane.”
From Sorting nexin 17 (SNX17) links endosomal sorting to Eps15 homology domain protein 1 (EHD1)–mediated fission machinery (2020) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Circuitry of Endocytosis at Nerve Terminals
Dittman, J., & Ryan, T. A. (2009) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113302 · Cited by 238 · cited 2×
“…modes of synaptic vesicle endocytosis have been suggested to occur at nerve terminals: clathrin-mediated endocytosis, kiss-and-run recapture, and bulk endocytosis (Takei et al., 1996; Clayton et al., 2008; Dittman and Ryan, 2009; Granseth et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2009; Hoopmann et al., 2010).”
BackgroundEHD1 is a synaptic protein that modulates exocytosis through binding to snapin
Wei, S., Xu, Y., Shi, H., Wong, S.-H., Han, W., Talbot, K., Hong, W., & Ong, W.-Y. (2010) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2010.07.014 · Cited by 22
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1754-07.2008 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1695 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E05-01-0076 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1445-08.2008 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1976-09.2009 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1398-9219.2004.00198.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4683-06.2007 · DOI
- 10.1002/jemt.20215 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80570-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00038-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77976-7 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1175790 · DOI
- 10.1038/35078549 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi702345m · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1007037107 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0710267105 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.01290 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1176921 · DOI
- 10.1038/35078543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.6316407 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb1986 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.020 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06967 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601961 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80828-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04718 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.276.5310.259 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.072686 · DOI
- 10.1038/8997 · DOI
- 10.1038/374186a0 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.133.6.1237 · DOI
- 10.1038/9004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.036673 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb1001-922 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1176007 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saheki, Y., & De Camilli, P. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005645 · Cited by 457
Bhattacharyya, S., Rainey, M. A., Arya, P., Mohapatra, B. C., Mushtaq, I., Dutta, S., George, M., Storck, M. D., McComb, R. D., Muirhead, D., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20727 · Cited by 36
Dhawan, K., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra119.011368 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Jakobsson, J., Ackermann, F., Andersson, F., Larhammar, D., Löw, P., & Brodin, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-09-28
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 13972-13980
- ISSN
- 0270-6474
- 1529-2401
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review