Cited by 163Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsIon channel regulation and function

Examination of TEA-induced synaptic enhancement in area CA1 of the hippocampus: the role of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in the induction of LTP

Open access
Huang, YY, Malenka, RC·1993·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The role of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCCs) in the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA1 region of rat hippocampus was determined by examining the relationship between LTP and the long- lasting synaptic enhancement induced by extracellular application of tetraethylammonium (TEA). Consistent with previous findings (Aniksztejn and Ben-Ari, 1991), the TEA-induced synaptic enhancement did not require NMDA receptor activation. It was blocked by the L-type VDCC antagonist nifedipine or by intracellular injection of the Ca2+ chelator 1,2-bis(2-amino-phenoxy)ethane N,N,N′,N′-tetra-acetic acid (BAPTA) and could be mimicked by direct activation of VDCCs with repetitive depolarizing current pulses. In contrast to its effect on TEA-induced synaptic enhancement, nifedipine had no effect on the magnitude or duration of NMDA receptor-dependent LTP. Saturation of NMDA receptor-dependent LTP reduced the magnitude of the TEA-induced synaptic enhancement. Similarly, increasing synaptic strength by initial application of TEA reduced the magnitude of the subsequent tetanus-induced LTP. Like LTP, the TEA-induced synaptic enhancement did not significantly affect paired-pulse facilitation. These results suggest that dihydropyridine-sensitive VDCCs do not normally contribute to the induction of NMDA receptor-dependent LTP even though their repetitive activation can generate an increase in synaptic strength. The mutual occlusion of LTP and TEA-induced synaptic enhancement suggests that they share a common expression mechanism and perhaps are generated by activation of common Ca(2+)-dependent intracellular processes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.13-02-00568.1993

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Voltage pulse potentiation (VPP) typically is transient, lasting no longer than 20 min.

    “the potentiation typically is transient, lasting no longer than 20 min (Refs. 189–193, but see Refs. 194, 195).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [193]

    The Results (Fig. 4A,B; page not given in our copy) report that potentiation induced by depolarizing pulses often decayed back to control, supporting its transient nature. The reported decay time is 10–30 minutes, so the source does not support the claim that it lasts no longer than 20 minutes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • With intense induction protocols for LTP, a component of LTP requires the activation of VDCCs.

    “with intense induction protocols for LTP a component of LTP requires the activation of VDCCs (49–51, 193, 196).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [193]

    The Discussion says L-type VDCCs generally do not contribute to LTP induction, while noting an exception for very high-frequency (200 Hz) tetani. That supports a role under an intense protocol, but this paper does not establish that a component of LTP requires VDCC activation under those conditions; its own nifedipine test found no effect on LTP induced by the tetanus it examined. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Y., & Malenka, R.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1993-02-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
568-576
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1516357089
Cited by
163
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH00942)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
tetraethylammonium, long-term potentiation, voltage-gated calcium channels, L-type calcium channels, dihydropyridine-sensitive channels, hippocampal CA1, nifedipine, BAPTA, tetanic stimulation, paired-pulse facilitation, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Egtazic Acid, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Nifedipine, Synapses, Tetraethylammonium Compounds, Calcium Channels, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Tetraethylammonium, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review