The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Mechanisms of Resistance to Peer Influence in Early Adolescence
Open accessAbstract
During the shift from a parent-dependent child to a fully autonomous adult, peers take on a significant role in shaping the adolescent's behavior. Peer-derived influences are not always positive, however. Here, we explore neural correlates of interindividual differences in the probability of resisting peer influence in early adolescence. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found striking differences between 10-year-old children with high and low resistance to peer influence in their brain activity during observation of angry hand movements and angry facial expressions: compared with subjects with low resistance to peer influence, individuals with high resistance showed a highly coordinated brain activity in neural systems underlying perception of action and decision making. These findings suggest that the probability of resisting peer influence depends on neural interactions during observation of emotion-laden actions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“individual differences in individuals' vulnerability to peer pressure are correlated with differences in structural and functional connectivity in ways that link the development of resistance to peer influence to improvements in the coordination of emotion and cognition.”
From A behavioral scientist looks at the science of adolescent brain development (2010) · cites this paper as Grosbras et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Results showed an age-related increase in the spatial extent of face-selective suprathreshold activation within right fusiform cortex (the ‘fusiform face area’; FFA): FFA was significantly larger in adult than child groups, and the adolescent group showed an intermediate pattern.”
From The social brain in adolescence: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies (2011) · cites this paper as Golarai et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“The expansion of FFA into surrounding cortex was correlated with a behavioural improvement in recognition memory for facial identity.”
From The social brain in adolescence: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies (2011) · cites this paper as Golarai et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“The group who scored high on the resistance to peer influence measure showed stronger functional connectivity between brain regions underlying action perception (e.g. STS) and decision making (e.g. lateral PFC, premotor cortex) than did the group who scored low on the measure.”
From The social brain in adolescence: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies (2011) · cites this paper as Grosbras et al., 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 · Cited by 7,433
Cattaneo, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.41 · Cited by 3,137
A self‐report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity and initial norms
Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf01537962 · Cited by 3,129
Cognitive and affective development in adolescence
Steinberg, L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005 · Cited by 2,978
Self-citationSocial perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01501-1 · Cited by 2,461
Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition
Blakemore, S., & Choudhury, S. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x · Cited by 2,328
Age differences in resistance to peer influence.
Steinberg, L. D., & Monahan, K. C. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531 · Cited by 1,789
Self-citationThe Vicissitudes of Autonomy in Early Adolescence
Steinberg, L. D., & Silverberg, S. B. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00250.x · Cited by 1,590
Self-citationThe Vicissitudes of Autonomy in Early Adolescence
Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. B. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130361 · Cited by 1,523
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking
Steinberg, L. (2008) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002 · Cited by 3,644
Self-citationWhy do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?
Paus, T., Keshavan, M., & Giedd, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2513 · Cited by 3,123
Self-citationAge differences in resistance to peer influence.
Steinberg, L. D., & Monahan, K. C. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531 · Cited by 1,789
Self-citationBeyond Homophily: A Decade of Advances in Understanding Peer Influence Processes
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x · Cited by 1,510
Somerville, L. H., Jones, R. M., & Casey, B. J. (2010) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.07.003 · Cited by 1,025
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosbras, M.-H., Jansen, M., Leonard, G., McIntosh, A., Osswald, K., Poulsen, C., Steinberg, L., Toro, R., & Paus, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Temple University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-07-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 8040-8045
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6672740
- OpenAlex
- W2010311715
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Santa Fe Institute
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- peer influence, resistance to peer influence, early adolescence, individual differences, neural correlates, angry facial expressions, action observation, decision-making, social cognition
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Peer Group, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
