Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatiotemporal structure of somatosensory responses of many-neuron ensembles in the rat ventral posterior medial nucleus of the thalamus

Open access
Nicolelis, MA, Chapin, JK·1994·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Classically, the rat ventral posterior medial (VPM) nucleus of the thalamus has been considered as a simple passive relay for single- whisker information to the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). However, recent reports have suggested that the VPM could contain a much more coarsely coded and spatiotemporally complex representation of the rat whisker pad. To address this possibility properly, we have carried out chronic simultaneous recordings of large numbers (up to 23) of single neurons, distributed across the entire VPM, in both awake and lightly anesthetized adult rats. Quantitative, computer-based reconstruction of receptive fields (RFs) revealed that single VPM neurons exhibit significant responses to discrete stimulation of as many as 20 single whiskers (mean +/- SD RF size, 13.7 +/- 4.8 whiskers). By defining multiple response magnitude (RM) thresholds it was possible to subdivide these large VPM RFs quantitatively into a prominent center (mean +/- SD, 1.41 +/- 0.70 whiskers, RM > 95%) and an excitatory surround (up to 18 whiskers, RM < 95%). VPM neurons exhibited both short-latency responses (SLRs, from 4 to 10 msec poststimulus) and/or long-latency responses (LLRs, 15–25 msec), each followed by inhibitory responses. Though LLRs were weaker (mean +/- SD, 47.19 +/- 33.34 Hz) than SLRs (119.63 +/- 50.12 Hz), they often defined RFs that differed considerably from those defined by the SLRs of the same cell. In particular, VPM cells with short-latency RFs centered in caudal whiskers (e.g., C1, D1, E1) showed a poststimulus time-dependent shift of these RF centers toward the rostral whiskers (e.g., C4, D4, E4). These caudal-to-rostral (C-->RF shifts occurred in neurons with the largest RFs of our sample (17.2 +/- 2.4 whiskers). On the other hand, VPM cells with short-latency RFs centered in rostral whiskers had the smallest RFs (13.1 +/- 4.1 whiskers) and usually did not exhibit time- dependent RF center shifts. Multivariate analysis revealed that these two groups of VPM neurons, C-->R shifting and rostral position (RP) cells, could be statistically distinguished according to a combination of three RF attributes (short-latency RF center location, RF size, and magnitude of RF center shift). Quantitative, computer-based reconstruction of “population response maps” demonstrated that the “place” coding for each single whisker in the VPM involved a distinct weighted contribution from a large proportion of the simultaneously recorded neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.14-06-03511.1994

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Nicolelis, M., & Chapin, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1994-06-01
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
3511-3532
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1906079979
Cited by
165
References
2
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatiotemporal structure of somatosensory responses of many-neuron ensembles in the rat ventral posterior medial nucleus of the thalamus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.14-06-03511.1994
The paper
Nicolelis, M., & Chapin, J. (1994). Spatiotemporal structure of somatosensory responses of many-neuron ensembles in the rat ventral posterior medial nucleus of the thalamus. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-06-03511.1994

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.