The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prior Expectation Mediates Neural Adaptation to Repeated Sounds in the Auditory Cortex: An MEG Study
Open accessAbstract
Repetition suppression, the phenomenon that the second presentation of a stimulus attenuates neural activity, is typically viewed as an automatic consequence of repeated stimulus presentation. However, a recent neuroimaging study has suggested that repetition suppression may be driven by top-down expectations. Here we examined whether and when repetition suppression can be modulated by top-down expectation. Participants listened to auditory stimuli in blocks where tone repetitions were either expected or unexpected, while we recorded ongoing neural activity using magnetoencephalography. We found robust repetition suppression in the auditory cortex for repeated tones. Interestingly, this reduction was significantly larger for expected than unexpected repetitions, both in terms of evoked activity and gamma-band synchrony. These findings indicate a role of top-down expectation in generating repetition suppression and are in line with predictive coding models of perception, in which the difference between expected and actual input is propagated from lower to higher cortical areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Direct evidence for alpha/beta and gamma in predictive coding per se comes from observations of increased gamma power to stimuli that are prediction errors (22, 24, 25).”
From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“But there is mounting evidence that oscillatory dynamics play a role in regulating cortical processing and thus can also play a role, especially the gamma (40 to 90 Hz) and alpha/beta (10 to 30 Hz) bands (1, 18–25).”
From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, violating expectations of auditory repetition causes enhanced gamma-band responses in early auditory cortex (Todorovic et al., 2011).”
From Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding (2012) · cites this paper as Todorovic et al., 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As with RS, ES has been consistently reported in human brain imaging studies across sensory modalities and noninvasive neural recording techniques 45 , 46 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 (but see Ref. 82)”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Numerous subsequent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and electroencephalography (EEG) studies have reported modulations of RS by the probability of a repetition 45 , 46 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 (i.e., expectation) (but see Refs. 68, 69, 70).”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Studies that have sought to test PP's characterization of oscillatory message passing have found that when a stimulus is expected, beta power gradually builds in the lead up to stimulus onset, and gamma activity is reduced when those expectations are realized.”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Todorovic et al. 45 found greater gamma power for unexpected tone repetitions and unexpected omissions, but unexpected repetitions also elicited greater power in low frequencies (5–9 Hz).”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Todorovic et al. 45 found greater gamma power for unexpected tone repetitions and unexpected omissions, but unexpected repetitions also elicited greater power in low frequencies (5–9 Hz).”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Studies that have sought to test PP's characterization of oscillatory message passing have found that when a stimulus is expected, beta power gradually builds in the lead up to stimulus onset, and gamma activity is reduced when those expectations are realized.”
From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/156869 · Cited by 10,323
Self-citationAn Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
Self-citationEmergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 4×
“It is well possible that expectation-related modulations are more pervasive in early sensory than later stages of cortical processing (Rao and Ballard, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShort-Term Synaptic Plasticity
Zucker, R. S., & Regehr, W. G. (2002) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547 · Cited by 5,068
Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 · Cited by 4,684
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 392
The auditory N1 suppression rebounds as prediction persists over time
Hsu, Y., Hämäläinen, J. A., & Waszak, F. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.019 · Cited by 13
“…of repeated stimuli was unexpected (functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Summerfield et al., 2008; Kovács et al., 2012; Grotheer and Kovács, 2014; Mayrhauser et al., 2014; magnetoencephalography (MEG): Todorovic et al., 2011; electroencephalography (EEG): Summerfield et al., 2011).”
Choi, J. Y., & Perrachione, T. K. (2019) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104655 · Cited by 13
“Auditory expectations sharpen neural responses to relevant stimulus features (Fritz et al., 2003; Todorovic et al., 2011), which may underlie our behavioral outcomes showing overall faster response times when the target words were preceded by an adapting carrier phrase.”
Maloney, R. T., Watson, T., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.057 · Cited by 13
Cornella, M., Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Leung, S., Schröger, E., & Escera, C. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.04.018 · Cited by 13
Wallentin, M., Michaelsen, J. L. D., Rynne, I., & Nielsen, R. H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.012 · Cited by 13
“…i.e. the fact that the neural responses observed for various stimuli are often found to be attenuated when repeated (Dehaene et al., 2001; Orfanidou et al., 2006; Raichle et al., 1994; Schacter and Buckner, 1998; Summerfeld et al., 2011; Summerfield et al., 2008; Todorovic et al., 2011).”
Neural Basis of the Time Window for Subjective Motor-Auditory Integration
Toida, K., Ueno, K., & Shimada, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00688 · Cited by 13
“This seems like the omission MMN, which is elicited when an expected stimulus is omitted in an oddball experimental paradigm (Raij et al., 1997; May and Tiitinen, 2010; Todorovic et al., 2011; SanMiguel et al., 2013).”
BackgroundTrunk, A., Stefanics, G., Zentai, N., Bacskay, I., Felinger, A., Thuróczy, G., & Hernádi, I. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14434 · Cited by 13
Marais, A.-L., & Roche-Labarbe, N. (2025) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101519 · Cited by 12
“Todorovic et al. (2011) presented trials of two tones where the second tone was either an identical repetition of the first one or omitted.”
Interacting parallel pathways associate sounds with visual identity in auditory cortices
Ahveninen, J., Huang, S., Ahlfors, S. P., Hämäläinen, M., Rossi, S., Sams, M. E., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.044 · Cited by 12
“In the whole-cortex mapping, individual subjects' noise-normalized MNEs (dSPM) of the difference responses between the ARepeatVChange and AVRepeat conditions were averaged over time windows, to mitigate the inter-subject variability of regional time courses and to reduce the number of statistical comparisons (see, e.g…”
MethodTowards an Entrepreneurial University: Case of Tunisia
Sidrat, S., & Boujelbène, Y. (2020) · Journal of Enterprising Culture · doi:10.1142/s0218495820500028 · Cited by 12
Noviello, S., Kamari, S., Deng, Z., Zheng, C., Chen, J., Pisani, A., Franchin, E., Pierotti, E., Tonolli, E., Monaco, S., et al. (2023) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108746 · Cited by 10
“…initial perceptual processing occurring around 100 – 150 ms after stimulus onset (Alilovi ´ c et al., 2019; Aru et al., 2016; Hsu et al., 2015; Todorovic et al., 2011; Wacongne et al., 2011), or earlier at the level of C1 component ( < 80 ms post-stimulus; Jabar et al., 2017), or even before…”
BackgroundTodorović, A., & Auksztulewicz, R. (2019) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2019.107871 · Cited by 10
Expectations about word stress modulate neural activity in speech-sensitive cortical areas
Honbolygó, F., Kóbor, A., Hermann, P., Kettinger, Á. O., Vidnyánszky, Z., Kovács, G., & Csépe, V. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107467 · Cited by 12
The Neural Representation of a Repeated Standard Stimulus in Dyslexia
Beach, S. D., Ozernov‐Palchik, O., May, S. C., Centanni, T. M., Perrachione, T. K., Pantazis, D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.823627 · Cited by 11
“For another, it can establish an internal model of expected stimulation, such that each expected repetition further reduces the neural response [expectation suppression (Todorovic et al., 2011)], while an unpredicted deviant triggers an increase in neural response known as prediction error (Wacongne et al.”
Backgroundde Boer, J., & Krumbholz, K. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01245 · Cited by 11
Experience-dependent long-term facilitation of skew adaptation
Habtegiorgis, S. W., Rifai, K., Lappe, M., & Wahl, S. (2018) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/18.9.7 · Cited by 11
“Moreover, to minimize the risk of error-driven fluctuations in neural responses, optimum perceptual adjustments to some subtle or rare environmental alterations, like our skew distortions, might be rather slow (Todorovic et al., 2011; Wark et al., 2009).”
BackgroundJohari, K., den Ouden, D., & Behroozmand, R. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05549-4 · Cited by 11
Learning to predict: Neuronal signatures of auditory expectancy in human event-related potentials
Fishman, Y. I., Lee, W.-W., & Sussman, E. S. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117472 · Cited by 11
“…a neuronal correlate of expectancy for the S2 stimulus that ollows the presentation of the S1 stimulus ( Mento, 2013 ; Mento et al., 015 ; van Boxtel and Brunia, 1994 a, Bickel et al., 2012 ; Chennu et al., 013 ; Tecce, 1972 ; Donchin et al., 1972 ; Naatanen and Gaillard, 1974 ; amano et…”
BackgroundResultEffects of Anticipation on Perception of Facial Expressions
Ran, G. M., Chen, X., Pan, Y., Hu, T. Q., & Ma, J. (2014) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/24.pms.118k13w4 · Cited by 11
Violated predictions enhance the representational fidelity of visual features in perception
Rideaux, R., Dang, P., Jackel-David, L., Buhmann, Z., Rangelov, D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2025) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.25.4.14 · Cited by 10
“Den Ouden, Kok, & De Lange, 2012; Kok, Jehee, & de Lange, 2012; Meyer & Olson, 2011; Richter, Ekman, & de Lange, 2018; Todorovic, van Ede, Maris, & de Lange, 2011), which is typically observed during the initial processing cascade in sensory cortices associated with the unexpected stimulus (Tang,…”
A link between age, affect, and predictions?
Trapp, S., Guitart‐Masip, M., & Schröger, E. (2022) · European Journal of Ageing · doi:10.1007/s10433-022-00710-5 · Cited by 13
“The rise of the predictive brain frameworks stimulated numerous studies designed to detect correlates, networks, and consequences of predictions and prediction errors (e.g., Alink et al., 2010; de Gardelle et al. 2013; Todorovic et al. 2011).”
BackgroundBraem, S., & Trapp, S. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0935-x · Cited by 9
Neural adaptation and cognitive inflexibility in repeated problem-solving behaviors
Huang, F., Han, L., Jiang, Y., Li, F., & Luo, J. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.001 · Cited by 10
Neural correlates of auditory sensory memory dynamics in the aging brain
Sur, S., & Golob, E. J. (2019) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.12.020 · Cited by 10
Propagation and update of auditory perceptual priors through alpha and theta rhythms
Ho, H. T., Burr, D. C., Alais, D., & Morrone, M. C. (2021) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15141 · Cited by 10
“As updating predictions involves modifying sensory representations, this should affect perceptual sensitivity on subsequent trials (Alink et al., 2010; St. John-Saaltink et al., 2016; Summerfield et al., 2008; Todorovic et al., 2011; Wacongne et al., 2011).”
MethodSensory-Motor Modulations of EEG Event-Related Potentials Reflect Walking-Related Macro-Affordances
Tosoni, A., Altomare, E. C., Brunetti, M., Croce, P., Zappasodi, F., & Committeri, G. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11111506 · Cited by 11
Abbasi, H. A., Henare, D., Kadel, H., & Schubö, A. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14151 · Cited by 10
Broca's region and Visual Word Form Area activation differ during a predictive Stroop task
Wallentin, M., Gravholt, C. H., & Skakkebaek, A. H. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.023 · Cited by 10
Laminar-specific cortical dynamics in human visual and sensorimotor corticesPreprint
Bonaiuto, J. J., Meyer, S. S., Little, S. J., Rossiter, H. E., Callaghan, M. F., Dick, F., Barnes, G. R., & Bestmann, S. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/226274 · Cited by 10
“Gamma activity increases in sensory areas during presentation of unexpected stimuli (Arnal et al., 2011; Gurtubay et al., 2001; Todorovic et al., 2011), and therefore we expected visual gamma activity in supragranular layers to be greater following incongruent instruction cues than after congruent…”
BackgroundRetrieving the structure of probabilistic sequences of auditory stimuli from EEG dataPreprint
Hernández, N., Duarte, A., Ost, G., Fraiman, R., Galves, A., & Vargas, C. D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 10
Predictions about prosody facilitate lexical access: Evidence from P50/N100 and MMN components
Zora, H., Wester, J., & Csépe, V. (2023) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.112262 · Cited by 10
Mocchi, M. M., Bartoli, E., Magnotti, J. F., de Gee, J. W., Metzger, B. A., Pascuzzi, B., Mathura, R. K., Pulapaka, S., Goodman, W. K., Sheth, S. A., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-80911-3 · Cited by 9
Learning by predicting: How predictive processing informs language development
Zettersten, M. (2019) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110596656-010 · Cited by 10
“Recent studies suggest that the reduction in cortical activity results from the stimulus becoming progressively more precisely predicted (Todorovic and de Lange 2012; Todorovic et al. 2011; Andics et al. 2013; Summerfield et al. 2011; Sum-merfield et al. 2008).”
Presentation Probability of Visual–Auditory Pairs Modulates Visually Induced Auditory Predictions
Stuckenberg, M. V., Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01398 · Cited by 9
Li, X., Lu, Y., & Zhao, H. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.020 · Cited by 10
“Some fMRI or MEG studies also examined how predictability influences early perceptual processing and found that predicted stimuli evoke reduced neural responses in the early visual/auditory cortex (Alink et al., 2010; den Ouden et al., 2010; Todorovic et al., 2011; Sohoglu et al., 2012).”
BackgroundPrior Precision Modulates the Minimization of Auditory Prediction Error
Hsu, Y., Waszak, F., & Hämäläinen, J. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00030 · Cited by 8
“Mounting evidence of the N1/N1m predictability effect further supports that it indicates the operation of an internal predictive mechanism, as predicted stimuli were associated with robust N1/N1m suppression (Schafer and Marcus, 1973; Schafer et al., 1981; Lange, 2009; Todorovic et al., 2011; Todorovic and de Lange, 2…”
Effect of Auditory Predictability on the Human Peripheral Auditory System
Riecke, L., Marianu, I.-A., & Martino, F. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00362 · Cited by 9
Sauer, A., Grent-‘t-Jong, T., Wibral, M., Grube, M., Singer, W., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.561973 · Cited by 11
“More recent studies have shown that top-down processes contribute toward repetition suppression (32, 33).”
BackgroundKirwan, C. B., Bjornn, D. K., Anderson, B. B., Vance, A., Eargle, D., & Jenkins, J. L. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.528079 · Cited by 12
“…(Malmierca et al., 2009), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Larsson and Smith, 2012; Grotheer and Gyula, 2015), electroencephalography (Costa-Faidella et al., 2011; Summerfield et al., 2011), and magnetoencephalography (Todorovic et al., 2011; Todorovic and de Lange, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodPedapati, E. V., Ethridge, L. E., Liu, Y., Liu, R., Sweeney, J. A., DeStefano, L. A., Miyakoshi, M., Razak, K. A., Schmitt, L., Moore, D. R., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0306157 · Cited by 8
Multi-Regional Adaptation in Human Auditory Association Cortex
Malinowska, U., Crone, N. E., Lenz, F. A., Cervenka, M. C., & Boatman‐Reich, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00247 · Cited by 8
“The two tone frequencies have been used in prior auditory oddball studies (Todorovic et al., 2011; Cervenka et al., 2013).”
Dual-stream cortical pathways mediate sensory prediction
Chu, Q., Ma, O., Hang, Y., & Tian, X. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad168 · Cited by 9
Context-dependent minimisation of prediction errors involves temporal-frontal activation
Hsu, Y., Xu, W., Parviainen, T. M., & Hämäläinen, J. A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116355 · Cited by 8
“…as expected stimuli also led to suppressed activity, possibly signalling the reduced prediction errors (Schafer and Marcus, 1973; Schafer et al., 1981; Lange, 2009; Todorovic et al., 2011; Todorovic and de Lange, 2012; SanMiguel et al., 2013; Timm et al., 2013; Hsu et al., 2014a, 2014b, 2016).”
Fonken, Y. M., Mukerji, A., Jimenez, R., Lin, J. J., Brunner, P., Schalk, G., & Knight, R. T. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/733212 · Cited by 8
Theriault (n.d.) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pkzr8 · Cited by 51
Hauswald, A., Benz, K. R., Hartmann, T., Demarchi, G., & Weisz, N. (2024) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.16381 · Cited by 7
“The illustration of sound feature specific neural activity during ‘ surprising ’ silent periods goes beyond the demonstration of a general reaction of the brain, known as evoked or induced omission responses (Raij et al., 1997; Todorovic et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodBeyond needling: integrating a Bayesian brain model into acupuncture treatment
Kang, B., Yoon, D.-E., Ryu, Y., Lee, I.-S., & Chae, Y. (2025) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci15020192 · Cited by 7
“The Bayesian framework was first applied to the visual system and has since gained acceptance across a wide range of research areas, including auditory, interoceptive, neuropsychiatric, and even social fields [4–7].”
Puzzled by dysfunctional breathing disorder(s)? Consider the Bayesian brain hypothesis!
Peiffer, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1270556 · Cited by 8
“…assessed and verified in the field of sensory perception, particularly for vision (Rao and Ballard, 1999; Murray et al., 2002) and audition (Todorovic et al., 2011) and subsequently, with mutual conceptual input, for interoception (Seth et al., 2011, reviewed in Van den Bergh et al., 2017)…”
BackgroundSound category habituation requires task-relevant attention
Moskowitz, H. S., & Sussman, E. S. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1228506 · Cited by 7
“” Finding no index of implicit expectation, diverges from previous studies that have shown that stimulus repetition can build strong expectations and influence the brain response without attention focused on the sounds (Todorovic et al., 2011).”
ResultBeta oscillation is an indicator for two patterns of sensorimotor synchronization
Liu, Y., Zhao, C., Sander, T. H., Yang, T., & Bao, Y. (2023) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.696 · Cited by 6
“Recent findings indicate that beta oscillations correlate not only with different types of movement but also with the temporal structure of the task (Arnal et al., 2011; Todorovic et al., 2011).”
BackgroundAttention modulates repetition effects in a context of low periodicity
Hsu, Y., Darriba, Á., & Waszak, F. (2021) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147559 · Cited by 7
“Stimulus repetition is thought to result in the attenuation of PE (Summerfield et al., 2008, 2011; Costa-Faidella et al., 2011; Todorovic et al., 2011; Wacongne et al., 2012; Andics et al., 2013; Emberson et al., 2019).”
Neural repetition suppression to vocal and non-vocal sounds
Heurteloup, C., Merchie, A., Roux, S., Bonnet‐Brilhault, F., Escera, C., & Gomot, M. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.020 · Cited by 7
Schach, S., Lindner, A., & Braun, D. A. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010585 · Cited by 7
Ono, K., Altmann, C. F., Matsuhashi, M., Mima, T., & Fukuyama, H. (2014) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.013 · Cited by 7
“The OR in the absence of attention is localized in the auditory cortex (AC) (Raij et al., 1997; Todorovic et al., 2011), which may be involved in prediction and pre-attentive perceptual grouping.”
Semantic prediction-errors are context-dependent: An ERP study
Jack, B. N., Pelley, M. E. L., Griffiths, O., Luque, D., & Whitford, T. J. (2018) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.10.034 · Cited by 8
Larsen, K. M., Mørup, M., Birknow, M. R., Fischer, E., Olsen, L., Didriksen, M., Baaré, W. F. C., Werge, T. M., Garrido, M. I., & Siebner, H. R. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101721 · Cited by 7
“This is in line with the notion that responses to repeated sounds are not only caused by simple mechanisms as neural fatigue, but are likely to be caused by fulfilled expectations (Auksztulewicz & Friston, 2016; Summerfield et al., 2008; Todorovic et al., 2011) including forward message passing of prediction error and…”
Auditory Perception: Hearing the Texture of Sounds
Rabinowitz, N. C., & King, A. J. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.027 · Cited by 8
“Recently, evidence supporting this has come from Todorovic and colleagues [13], who showed that repetition suppression depends on expectation.”
BackgroundSong, B., Sommer, W., & Maurer, U. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02111 · Cited by 7
“In an MEG study with pure tones, Todorovic et al., (2011) employed a comparable design and observed a robust RS in the auditory cortex for repeated tones, with a significantly greater reduction in evoked neural activity and gamma-band synchrony for expected than for unexpected repetitions.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialExpectation-driven sensory adaptations support enhanced acuity during categorical perception
Sainburg, T., McPherson, T., Arneodo, E. M., Rudraraju, S., Turvey, M., Theilman, B. H., Tostado-Marcos, P., Thielk, M., & Gentner, T. Q. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-01899-1 · Cited by 7
“For example, prior expectations drive attention and active sensing 36,37 , which modulates sensory encoding 11,15,38,39 and improves sensory acuity 12–14,”
Økland, H. S., Todorović, A., Lüttke, C. S., McQueen, J. M., & de Lange, F. P. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44311-2 · Cited by 7
Auditory predictions are phonological when phonetic information is variable
Rhodes, R. E., Avcu, E., Han, C., & Hestvik, A. (2022) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2022.2043395 · Cited by 7
“Alaminos et al., 2021; Garrido et al., 2008, 2009; Lieder et al., 2013; Todorovic et al., 2011; Winkler & Czigler, 2012).”
Neural response and representation: Facial expressions in scenes
Cao, F., Zeng, K., Zheng, J., Yu, L., Liu, S., Zhang, L., & Xu, Q. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14184 · Cited by 6
Remembering sounds in the brain: From locationist findings to dynamic connectivity research
Campo, F. F., & Brattico, E. (2023) · Rivista di Psicologia Clinica · doi:10.3280/rpc2-2022oa14002 · Cited by 6
Which Rhythms Reflect Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processing?
Xiong, Y., Fries, P., & Bastos, A. M. (2023) · Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20910-9_25 · Cited by 7
Gutschalk, A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33045-2_32 · Cited by 6
Motor-Evoked Potentials in the Lower Back Are Modulated by Visual Perception of Lifted Weight
Behrendt, F., de Lussanet, M. H. E., Zentgraf, K., & Zschorlich, V. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157811 · Cited by 6
Li, X., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Zhao, H., & Du, X. (2017) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-017-9442-4 · Cited by 8
“Both studies related to general sensory processing and those related to speech processing have demonstrated that prediction reduces sensory activities (e. g., Alink et al. 2010; den Ouden et al. 2010; Todorovic et al. 2011; Sohoglu et al. 2012), and thus have provided supporting evidence for the predictive coding theo…”
InfluentialCompetitive Frontoparietal Interactions Mediate Implicit Inferences
Wokke, M. E., & Ro, T. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2551-18.2019 · Cited by 6
“…on the P3, where P3 activity is modulated when the model or context of a stimulus environment needs to be updated (Donchin, 1981; Donchin and Coles, 1988; Polich and Kok, 1995; Todorovic et al., 2011; Seppänen et al., 2012; Silverstein et al., 2015; Bang and Rahnev, 2017; Li et al., 2018).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialStange, L., Ossandón, J., & Röder, B. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0339 · Cited by 5
“However, (Bendixen et al., 2009) experiment and other previous studies (SanMiguel, Saupe, & Schröger, 2013; Todorovic et al., 2011; Todorovic & Lange, 2012; Wacongne et al., 2011) The present study implemented a stimulation protocol that unambiguously allowed us to assess the first neural response…”
ResultEffects of expectations on loudness and loudness difference
Parker, S., Moore, J. M., Bahraini, S., Gunthert, K. C., & Zellner, D. A. (2012) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0326-8 · Cited by 6
Ono, K., Matsuhashi, M., Mima, T., Fukuyama, H., & Altmann, C. F. (2013) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12254 · Cited by 6
“Because we were mainly interested in the cortical distribution of the omission-related response, which was found in the time window of 100–200 ms after the omission onset in the previous studies (Yabe et al., 1998; R€usseler et al., 2001; Bendixen et al., 2009; Horv ath et al., 2010; Todorovic et al., 2011; Wacongne e…”
BackgroundMethodResultNoise sensitivity in the function and structure of the brain
Kliuchko, M. (2017) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 5
Temporal context actively shapes EEG signatures of time perceptionPreprint
Damsma, A., Schlichting, N., & van Rijn, H. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.03.17.995704 · Cited by 6
Otsuka, S., Nakagawa, S., & Furukawa, S. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac002 · Cited by 4
“In contrast, temporal predictability has also been reported to suppress cortical and brainstem potentials (Lange 2009; Costa-Faidella et al. 2011; Todorovic et al. 2011; Gorina-Careta et al. 2016), which could be evidence of the predictive coding hypothesis, which posits that the neural responses to expected stimuli s…”
BackgroundDauer, T., Nerness, B., & Fujioka, T. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.002 · Cited by 5
Predictive encoding of pure tones and FM-sweeps in the human auditory cortex
Stein, J., von Kriegstein, K., & Tabas, A. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex Communications · doi:10.1093/texcom/tgac047 · Cited by 5
“…areas measuring the mismatch negativity (MNN), a component of the event-related potentials assumed to encode prediction error (Cornella et al. 2012; Costa-Faidella et al. 2011; Dürschmid et al. 2016; Lecaignard et al. 2015; Phillips et al. 2016; Todorovic and de Lange 2012; Todorovic et al. 2011).”
BackgroundKronbichler, L., Said‐Yürekli, S., & Kronbichler, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31091-4 · Cited by 5
Synchrony upon repetition: One or multiple neural mechanisms?
Weiner, K. S., & Kalanit Grill-spector, A. (2012) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.689973 · Cited by 5
Tang, M. F., Smout, C., Arabzadeh, E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/213710 · Cited by 6
The sound of silence: Omission responses and how the brain predicts in the absence of sound
Lao-Rodríguez, A. B., Schröger, E., & Malmierca, M. S. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106505 · Cited by 4
Alamalhoda, M., Leesch, F., Giovanetti, F., Dunne, E., Pilloni, G., Caffrey, M., O’Keeffe, J., Venturino, A., & Ferretti, M. T. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332310 · Cited by 6
“Similar adaptation has been previously described with repeated acoustic stimulations [46] as well as with 40 Hz combined visual and auditory entrainment [18].”
Surprising sounds influence risky decision making
Feng, G. W., & Rutledge, R. B. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51729-4 · Cited by 4
Wong, B. W. L., Huo, S., & Maurer, U. (2024) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.16546 · Cited by 4
“Additionally, the participant-related variables such as expectations and attention also play a role (e.g. Costa-Faidella, Baldeweg, et al., 2011; Hari et al., 1979; Herholz et al., 2009; Todorovic et al., 2011).”
Hierarchical deviant processing in auditory cortex of awake mice
Luo, D., Liu, J., Auksztulewicz, R., Yip, T. K. W., Kanold, P. O., & Schnupp, J. W. H. (2025) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2025.109242 · Cited by 4
Predicting Affective Information – An Evaluation of Repetition Suppression Effects
Trapp, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01365 · Cited by 4
“Decreased neural responses for predictable sensory events are considered as the hallmark of predictive processing, and indeed they have been reported in numerous studies (e.g., Alink et al., 2010; Todorovic et al., 2011; de Gardelle et al., 2013).”
Significant repetition probability effects in schizophrenia
Kovács, G., Grotheer, M., Münke, L., Kéri, S., & Nenadić, I. (2019) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.05.006 · Cited by 4
Spatiotemporal Signatures of Surprise Captured by Magnetoencephalography
Mousavi, Z., Kiani, M. M., & Aghajan, H. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2022.865453 · Cited by 4
Warda, S., & Khan, A. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02533-z · Cited by 4
“Prior research indicates a top-down mediation of repetition suppression by probabilistic manipulation in the early auditory cortex (Todorovic et al., 2011).”
BackgroundTardiff, N., Suriya-Arunroj, L., Cohen, Y. E., & Gold, J. I. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010601 · Cited by 7
Jalalkamali, H., & Nazari, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2023.2245601 · Cited by 4
“Reduction in repetition suppression by unexpected stimuli has also been found using fMRI (Andics et al., 2013) and M/EEG (Summer fi eld et al., 2008; Todorovic et al., 2011; Todorovic & de Lange, 2012).”
MethodYu, W., Chien, Y.-F., Wang, B., Zhao, J., & Li, W. (2024) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2023.75 · Cited by 4
“The adjusted prediction would then be transmitted down-ward to generate expectations at a lower level, suppressing the prediction error (Garrido et al., 2007, 2009; Parmentier et al., 2011; Todorovi ć et al., 2011).”
Rigoulot, S., & Armony, J. L. (2016) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13391 · Cited by 4
“, 2006), MEG (Rosburg, 2004; Todorovic et al., 2011) and fMRI (Grill-Spector et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRethinking Predictive Processing
Furutachi, S., & Hofer, S. B. (2026) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-102124-031410 · Cited by 3
Hu, Z., Tran, D. M. D., & Rideaux, R. (2025) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.152 · Cited by 8
“This finding aligns with other neuroimaging evidence supporting the sharpening account ( den Ouden et al., 2008; Todorovic et al., 2011).”
Short-Term Habituation of Auditory N1 in Spoken Word-Forms Is Modulated by Phonological Information
Yue, J., Wang, P., Li, J., Li, Z., Liang, X., & He, Y. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12101279 · Cited by 3
“Second, the phonological modulation on N1 habituation is unlikely to be caused by general cognitive functions, such as expectation [29] and selective attention [26], which are not specific to linguistic processing.”
BackgroundResultDemchuk, A. M., Esteves, I. M., Chang, H., Sun, J., & McNaughton, B. L. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1619-23.2024 · Cited by 3
Trial-by-trial predictions of subjective time from human brain activity
(4463242), M. S., Fountas, Z., Seth, A. K., & Roseboom, W. (2022) · Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) · Cited by 4
Perceptual Inference: A Matter of Predictions and Errors
Kok, P. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.061 · Cited by 4
“This coding scheme can account for many properties of how neurons behave in early visual cortex [2, 4], and has received indirect support from neuroimaging [3, 5–8] and electrophysiology [9, 10] in humans, and from electrophysiology in monkeys [11].”
Empathy: The Role of Expectations
Trapp, S., Schütz‐Bosbach, S., & Bar, M. (2017) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073917709939 · Cited by 4
Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction
Costantini, M., Migliorati, D., Donno, B., Sirota, M., & Ferri, F. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.016 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Todorovic, A., van Ede, F., Maris, E., & de Lange, F. P.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- ORCID
- Maris, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-06-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 9118-9123
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6623501
- OpenAlex
- W2017040534
- Semantic Scholar
- 01da2b94c0d012b4894f0ab8dd0e90bff96b699e
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- repetition suppression, top-down expectations, auditory cortex, predictive coding, auditory evoked potentials, neural adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Physiological, Attention, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Magnetoencephalography, Young Adult, Anticipation, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review