The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Influence of Associative and Nonassociative Learning Mechanisms on the Responsiveness of Prefrontal and Accumbal Dopamine Transmission to Food Stimuli in Rats Fed Ad Libitum
Open accessAbstract
Feeding a novel food (Fonzies) to rats fed ad libitum with standard food increased extracellular dopamine (DA) in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFCX) and in the medial nucleus accumbens (NAc). Previous Fonzies feeding, although it did not affect the increase of extracellular DA in the PFCX in response to Fonzies feeding, blunted that increase in the NAc (habituation); recovery from habituation in the NAc was complete 5 d after previous Fonzies feeding. Predictive association of an otherwise neutral stimulus extrinsic to Fonzies (empty plastic box) with Fonzies feeding resulted in the acquisition by the stimulus of the property to elicit incentive responses directed toward the stimulus and to increase extracellular DA in the PFCX. However, the same stimulus, or a more complex stimulus including intrinsic stimuli (Fonzies-filled plastic box), failed to acquire the ability to modify extracellular DA in the NAc. Pseudoconditioning, i.e., nonpredictive association of the extrinsic stimulus (empty box) with Fonzies feeding, did not result in acquisition by the stimulus of the property to elicit incentive responses and to increase extracellular DA in the PFCX. Repeated nonreinforced presentation of previously conditioned extrinsic stimuli (empty box) resulted in extinction of the property to elicit incentive responses and to increase extracellular DA in the PFCX. These results indicate that in rats fed ad libitum, phasic activation of mesocortical and mesolimbic DA systems by motivational stimuli is differentially influenced by associative (conditioning) and nonassociative (habituation) learning mechanisms and is differentially related to acquisition and expression of incentive motivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Robinson, T. (1993) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-p · Cited by 7,346
Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior
Thompson, R. F., & Spencer, W. A. (1966) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0022681 · Cited by 2,608 · cited 1×
“Therefore, after stimulus preexposure, a form of habituation, defined as a decrease in response to a repetitive stimulus (Thompson and Spencer, 1966), differentially affects mesolimbic as compared with mesocortical DA transmission.”
BackgroundThe role of dopamine in locomotor activity and learning
Beninger, R. J. (1983) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(83)90038-3 · Cited by 848
Preferential activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli
Mirenowicz, J., & Schultz, W. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379449a0 · Cited by 829
Hernandez, L., & Hoebel, B. G. (1988) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(88)90036-7 · Cited by 627
Modulatory functions of neurotransmitters in the striatum: ACh/dopamine/NMDA interactions
Di Chiara, G., Morelli, M., & Consolo, S. (1994) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(94)90005-1 · Cited by 467
Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes
Robbins, T. W., Cador, M., Taylor, J. R., & Everitt, B. J. (1989) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(89)80025-9 · Cited by 458
Feeding and hypothalamic stimulation increase dopamine turnover in the accumbens
Hernandez, L., & Hoebel, B. G. (1988) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(88)90324-1 · Cited by 355
Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: importance of drive
Wilson, C., Nomikos, G., Collu, M., & Fibiger, H. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-07-05169.1995 · Cited by 294
Salamone, J. D. (1992) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245133 · Cited by 291
Cited by
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Bardo, M. T., & Hammer, R. P. (1991) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90226-e · Cited by 3,219
Ikemoto, S., & Panksepp, J. (1999) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00023-5 · Cited by 1,450
Avena, N. M., Rada, P., & Hoebel, B. G. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019 · Cited by 1,358
Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction
Di Chiara, G. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00286-3 · Cited by 996
Metadata
- Authors
- Bassareo, V., & Di Chiara, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1997-01-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 851-861
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2148176119
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Influence of Associative and Nonassociative Learning Mechanisms on the Responsiveness of Prefrontal and Accumbal Dopamine Transmission to Food Stimuli in Rats Fed Ad Libitum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.17-02-00851.1997
- The paper
- Bassareo, V., & Di Chiara, G. (1997). Differential Influence of Associative and Nonassociative Learning Mechanisms on the Responsiveness of Prefrontal and Accumbal Dopamine Transmission to Food Stimuli in Rats Fed Ad Libitum. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.17-02-00851.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.