The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Simple cells in the primary visual cortex often appear to compute a weighted sum of the light intensity distribution of the visual stimuli that fall on their receptive fields. A linear model of these cells has the advantage of simplicity and captures a number of basic aspects of cell function. It, however, fails to account for important response nonlinearities, such as the decrease in response gain and latency observed at high contrasts and the effects of masking by stimuli that fail to elicit responses when presented alone. To account for these nonlinearities we have proposed a normalization model, which extends the linear model to include mutual shunting inhibition among a large number of cortical cells. Shunting inhibition is divisive, and its effect in the model is to normalize the linear responses by a measure of stimulus energy. To test this model we performed extracellular recordings of simple cells in the primary visual cortex of anesthetized macaques. We presented large stimulus sets consisting of (1) drifting gratings of various orientations and spatiotemporal frequencies; (2) plaids composed of two drifting gratings; and (3) gratings masked by full-screen spatiotemporal white noise. We derived expressions for the model predictions and fitted them to the physiological data. Our results support the normalization model, which accounts for both the linear and the nonlinear properties of the cells. An alternative model, in which the linear responses are subject to a compressive nonlinearity, did not perform nearly as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex
Heeger, D. J. (1992) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800009640 · Cited by 1,835
Self-citationStatistical data analysis in the computer age
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5018.390 · Cited by 1,192
Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488 · Cited by 890
Self-citationSummation and Division by Neurons in Primate Visual Cortex
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8191289 · Cited by 649 · cited 6×
“One is response saturation (Maffei and Fiorentini, 1973; Dean, 1981a; Albrecht and Hamilton, 1982; Ohzawa et al., 1982; Li and Creutzfeldt, 1984; Sclar et al., 1990; Bonds, 1991; Carandini and Heeger, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationOrientation selectivity in the cat's striate cortex is invariant with stimulus contrast
Sclar, G., & Freeman, R. D. (1982) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00238641 · Cited by 339
Skottun, B. C., Bradley, A., Sclar, G., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D. (1987) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1987.57.3.773 · Cited by 298 · cited 2×
“Another way to describe this behavior is to say that the orientation tuning scaled with contrast, a property that has been repeatedly observed for both orientation tuning and spatial frequency tuning (Movshon et al., 1978c; Albrecht and Hamilton, 1982; Sclar and Freeman, 1982; Li and Creutzfeldt, 1984; Skottun et al.,…”
BackgroundCortical neurons: Isolation of contrast gain control
Geisler, W. S., & Albrecht, D. G. (1992) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90196-p · Cited by 211
Cited by
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2214050 · Cited by 6,064
Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation
Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193 · Cited by 2,460
Normalization as a canonical neural computation
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3136 · Cited by 1,906
“Indeed, the normalization model was first developed to account for the physiological responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1”
MethodSelf-citationThe Normalization Model of Attention
Reynolds, J. H., & Heeger, D. J. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carandini, M., Heeger, D. J., & Movshon, J. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8621-8644
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2116079555
- Cited by
- 922
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.17-21-08621.1997
- The paper
- Carandini, M., Heeger, D. J., & Movshon, J. A. (1997). Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.17-21-08621.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.