Strengthened Inputs from Secondary Motor Cortex to Striatum in a Mouse Model of Compulsive Behavior
Open accessAbstract
Hyperactivity in striatum is associated with compulsive behaviors in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related illnesses, but it is unclear whether this hyperactivity is due to intrinsic striatal dysfunction or abnormalities in corticostriatal inputs. Understanding the cellular and circuit properties underlying striatal hyperactivity could help inform the optimization of targeted stimulation treatments for compulsive behavior disorders. To investigate the cellular and synaptic abnormalities that may underlie corticostriatal dysfunction relevant to OCD, we used the Sapap3 knock-out (Sapap3-KO) mouse model of compulsive behaviors, which also exhibits hyperactivity in central striatum.Ex vivo electrophysiology in double-transgenic mice was used to assess intrinsic excitability and functional synaptic input in spiny projection neurons (SPNs) and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs) in central striatum of Sapap3-KOs and wild-type (WT) littermates. While we found no differences in intrinsic excitability of SPNs or FSIs between Sapap3-KOs and WTs, excitatory drive to FSIs was significantly increased in KOs. Contrary to predictions, lateral orbitofrontal cortex-striatal synapses were not responsible for this increased drive; optogenetic stimulation revealed that lateral orbitofrontal cortex input to SPNs was reduced in KOs (∼3-fold) and unchanged in FSIs. However, secondary motor area (M2) postsynaptic responses in central striatum were significantly increased (∼6-fold) in strength and reliability in KOs relative to WTs. These results suggest that increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to both in vivo striatal hyperactivity and compulsive behaviors, and support a potential role for presupplementary/supplementary motor cortical regions in the pathology and treatment of compulsive behavior disorders. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT These findings highlight an unexpected contribution of M2 projections to striatal dysfunction in the Sapap3-KO obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)-relevant mouse model, with M2 inputs strengthened by at least sixfold onto both spiny projection neurons and fast-spiking interneurons in central striatum. Because M2 is thought to be homologous to presupplementary/supplementary motor areas (pre-SMA/SMA) in humans, regions important for movement preparation and behavioral sequencing, these data are consistent with a model in which increased drive from M2 leads to excessive selection of sequenced motor patterns. Together with observations of hyperactivity in pre-SMA/SMA in both OCD and Tourette syndrome, and evidence that pre-SMA is a potential target for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in OCD, these results support further dissection of the role of M2 in compulsivity.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In Sapap3-KO mice, a model of compulsive grooming, intrinsic excitability of central striatal SPNs and FSIs was normal, but cortical input to central striatum was imbalanced. LOFC input to SPNs was reduced, while M2 input to both SPNs and FSIs was substantially strengthened, suggesting increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to striatal hyperactivity and compulsive behavior.
Key findings
- No genotype differences were found in intrinsic excitability of SPNs or FSIs, or in FSI number in central striatum (FSI count p = 0.21, WRST).
- Excitatory drive to FSIs was increased in Sapap3-KOs with intrastriatal electrical stimulation: at 20 µA, WT EPSC amplitude was 422 pA (SEM 59 pA) vs KO 857 pA (SEM 128 pA; p < 0.01, WRST).
- LOFC input to central striatal SPNs was reduced ~3.2-fold in KOs (WT 444.84 pA, IQR 637.43 pA; KO 137.92 pA, IQR 110.20 pA; p = 6.14 × 10⁻⁴, WRST), with no significant change in FSIs.
- M2 input to central striatum was increased in KOs: SPN EPSCs were ~6-fold larger (WT 42.58 pA, IQR 136.36 pA; KO 254.28 pA, IQR 221.90 pA; p = 1.11 × 10⁻⁴) and FSI EPSCs ~6.6-fold larger (WT 85.81 pA, IQR 158.33 pA; KO 564.65 pA, IQR 640.84 pA; p = 2.44 × 10⁻⁵); SPN response reliability increased from 65.41% (SEM 7.17%) in WTs to 100% in KOs (p = 0.0034).
- Strengthened M2 synapses involved postsynaptic changes: SPN aEPSC amplitudes were greater in KOs (WT 13.25 pA, IQR 2.27 pA; KO 20.48 pA, IQR 8.59 pA; p < 0.05), and NMDA-mediated currents were increased in both SPNs (WT 95.99 pA, IQR 111.69 pA; KO 174.77 pA, IQR 268.43 pA; p < 0.05) and FSIs (WT 27.56 pA, IQR 75.81 pA; KO 108.61 pA, IQR 79.91 pA; p < 0.05).
Methods
- Ex vivo acute slice electrophysiology in Sapap3-KO//PV-Cre and WT littermates, with recordings from central striatal SPNs and PV-positive FSIs; intrinsic excitability and synaptic responses were measured blind to genotype.
- Optogenetic stimulation of ChR2-expressing LOFC or M2 terminals in central striatum, plus intrastriatal electrical stimulation, to assess region-specific excitatory input.
- Retrograde Fluoro-Gold tracing from central striatum, PV immunohistochemistry for FSI counts, and separate grooming assessments; statistical comparisons used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and ANOVA, with medians ± IQR unless noted.
Limitations
- The paper states that the ex vivo data do not directly explain baseline SPN hyperactivity in vivo and that future in vivo studies of M2 and central striatal SPN activity are needed.
- The paper states that FSI-SPN synapses were not measured, so changes there could affect interpretation.
- The paper cautions that findings should be translated to human OCD with caution and should not be used as the basis for treatment recommendations; evident from the text, some optogenetic and aEPSC groups had small animal numbers (e.g., LOFC KO SPNs: 3 animals, 15 cells; M2 KO SPNs: 7 animals, 22 cells; aEPSC: 2 WT mice, 9 cells and 3 KO mice, 12 cells).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
SPN mean response reliability was significantly increased in KOs relative to WTs.
“SPN mean response reliability was significantly increased in KOs relative to WTs”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“we did observe a substantial increase in M2 reliability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
There are no genotype differences in PPR at M2 synapses in either FSIs or SPNs.
“No genotype differences in PPR were observed in either FSIs or SPNs (Table 2), suggesting a postsynaptic alteration in glutamate receptor number or composition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There are no differences in intrinsic excitability of FSIs between Sapap3-KOs and WTs.
“However, there were no detectable genotype differences in intrinsic excitability of FSIs as assessed by firing rate I-O curves (Fig. 1D), I-O curve linear slope, or any other intrinsic properties (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SPNs in KO mice showed significantly greater aEPSCs relative to WT mice.
“SPNs in KO mice showed significantly greater aEPSCs relative to WT mice”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was not a significant correlation between average fluorescence intensity of ChR2-infected M2 projections and overall average amplitude of EPSCs recorded in FSIs and SPNs in a given animal.
“There was not a significant correlation (r ϭ Ϫ0.17, p ϭ 0.45, Pearson's R).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The paper found a reduction of LOFC input specifically onto SPNs, in contrast to predictions that LOFC-SPN input would be upregulated.
“First, we found a reduction of LOFC input specifically onto SPNs, in contrast to predictions that LOFC-SPN input would be upregulated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
M2 inputs are strengthened by at least ~6-fold onto both SPNs and FSIs in central striatum.
“Even more strikingly, we found that M2 inputs are strengthened by at least ϳ6-fold onto both SPNs and FSIs in central striatum (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
- Findingown data
There are no genotype differences in EPSC decay kinetics at M2 synapses.
“The decay kinetics of EPSCs were also similar in WTs and KOs (Table 2), suggesting no change in subunit composition of AMPA receptors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
FSIs in central striatum of Sapap3-KOs had significantly greater EPSC amplitudes than WTs.
“FSIs in central striatum of KOs had significantly greater EPSC amplitudes than WTs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
- Findingown data
There are no differences in intrinsic excitability of SPNs between Sapap3-KOs and WTs.
“We first found that there were no genotype differences in SPN intrinsic excitability, as assessed by firing rate I-O curves (Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in M2 synaptic strength is not due to differences in viral expression levels.
“This general increase in synaptic strength was not due to a difference in viral expression levels because terminal fluorescence in central striatum was similar across genotypes, and we saw no correlation between EPSC amplitude and fluorescence intensity (Fig. 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
M2 input to central striatum is increased in Sapap3-KOs.
“In contrast, we found a dramatic increase in the strength of synaptic input from M2 onto both FSIs and SPNs in Sapap3-KOs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SPNs in central striatum of Sapap3-KOs had significantly greater EPSC amplitudes than WTs.
“SPNs in the central striatum of KOs had significantly greater EPSC amplitudes than WTs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
- Findingown data
The paper observed weakened LOFC input to central striatal SPNs in Sapap3-KOs.
“we observed weakened LOFC input to central striatal SPNs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The paper observed no difference in overall presynaptic excitatory drive to SPNs in KOs versus WTs.
“we observed no difference in overall presynaptic excitatory drive to SPNs in KOs versus WTs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No genotype difference in counted cells was observed.
“No genotype difference in counted cells was observed (F (1) ϭ 3.22, p ϭ 0.10, ANOVA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AMPA/NMDA ratios in SPNs were significantly lower in KOs relative to WTs.
“AMPA/NMDA ratios in SPNs were significantly lower in KOs relative to WTs (WT 4.09 Ϯ 4.36, KO 1.94, IQR ϭ 2.22; Z ϭ 3.29, p ϭ 9.89 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 , WRST).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At maximum stimulation intensity (20 A), KOs displayed significantly larger EPSCs.
“At maximum stimulation intensity (20 A), KOs displayed significantly larger EPSCs (rank sum ϭ 57, p ϭ 0.0057, WRST).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Evoked response I-O curves in SPNs were not different in KOs versus WTs.
“Evoked response I-O curves in SPNs were not different in KOs versus WTs (WTs: 8 animals, 14 cells; KOs: 6 animals, 12 cells; F (1) ϭ 0.016, p ϭ 0.90, ANOVA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no difference observed in the number of FSIs in WTs versus KOs.
“There was no difference observed in the number of FSIs in WTs versus KOs (rank sum ϭ 44, p ϭ 0.21, WRST).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Evoked responses in FSIs were significantly greater in KOs relative to WTs.
“Evoked responses in FSIs were significantly greater in KOs relative to WTs (WTs: 6 animals, 13 cells; KOs: 6 animals, 12 cells; genotype, F (1) ϭ 8.11, p ϭ 0.014; interaction, F (7) ϭ 4.05, p ϭ 0.023, ANOVA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NMDA-mediated currents were significantly greater in FSIs in KO mice relative to WT mice.
“NMDA-mediated currents were significantly greater in FSIs in KO mice (108.61pA, IQR ϭ 79.91 pA, 3 mice, 16 cells) relative to WT mice (27.56,IQR ϭ 75.81 pA, 4 mice, 11 cells; Z ϭ Ϫ2.25, p ϭ 0.02, WRST).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NMDA-mediated currents were significantly greater in SPNs in KO mice relative to WTs.
“NMDA-mediated currents were significantly greater in SPNs in KO mice (174.77,IQR ϭ 268.43 pA, 3 mice, 18 cells) relative to WTs (95.99 pA, IQR ϭ 111.69 pA, 5 mice, 19 cells; Z ϭ Ϫ2.23, p ϭ 0.02, WRST).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At maximum stimulation intensity (20 A), EPSC sizes were not different between WTs and KOs.
“At maximum stimulation intensity (20 A), EPSC sizes were not different between WTs and KOs (Z ϭ Ϫ0.75, p ϭ 0.45, WRST).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
LOFC contained a significantly higher proportion of labeled cells than MOFC, PL, and DLOFC.
“LOFC contained a significantly higher proportion of labeled cells (WT: 17.3 Ϯ 2.4%; KO: 26.3 Ϯ 3.9%, p Ͻ 0.001) than MOFC (WT: 4.2 Ϯ 2.4%; KO: 4.1 Ϯ 1.3%, p Ͻ 0.001), PL (WT: 5.0 Ϯ 0.8%; KO: 4.5 Ϯ 1.3%, p Ͻ 0.001), and DLOFC (WT: 3.5 Ϯ 0.8%; KO: 9.0 Ϯ 1.8%; p Ͻ 0.001, post hoc contrasts).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AMPA/NMDA ratios were not significantly different between genotypes in FSIs.
“AMPA/NMDA ratios were not significantly different between genotypes in FSIs (WT 16.67, IQR ϭ 14.28, KO 11.79, IQR ϭ 14.14; Z ϭ 0.86, p ϭ 0.39, WRST).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No differences were observed between SPN I-O curves in Sapap3-KOs and WTs.
“No differences were observed between SPN I-O curves in Sapap3-KOs (4 animals, 25 cells) and WTs (4 animals, 14 cells).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were differences in the proportions of labeled cells counted across regions.
“there were differences in the proportions of labeled cells counted across regions (F (1) ϭ 60.19, p ϭ 0.000, ANOVA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No differences were observed between FSI I-O curves in Sapap3-KOs and WTs.
“No differences were observed between FSI I-O curves in Sapap3-KOs (3 animals, 23 cells) and WTs (5 animals, 18 cells).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results are the first demonstration of upregulated M2 corticostriatal input in an OCD-relevant mouse model.
“These results are the first demonstration of upregulated M2 corticostriatal input in an OCD-relevant mouse model and highlight the potential role of pre-SMA/SMA in the pathology of compulsivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Increased responsiveness of central striatum to input from M2 contributes to the generation of OCD-relevant striatal hyperactivity.
“These results suggest a model in which increased responsiveness of central striatum to input from M2 contributes to the generation of OCD-relevant striatal hyperactivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
- Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
- Interpretationown data
The decreased LOFC EPSC amplitudes in KO SPNs are not due to a decrease in presynaptic release probability.
“To address whether the decreased EPSC amplitudes in KO SPNs were due to a decrease in presynaptic release probability, we calculated PPR; no significant differences were observed (Table 2), suggesting a postsynaptic effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Strengthened M2 inputs in central striatum of Sapap3-KOs are caused by an increase in both AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated currents at these synapses.
“Together, these data suggest that strengthened M2 inputs in central striatum of Sapap3-KOs are caused by an increase in both AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated currents at these synapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to compulsive behaviors in Sapap3-KOs.
“These results suggest that increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to both in vivo striatal hyperactivity and compulsive behaviors”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These findings are the first demonstration of increased strength of M2-striatal circuits in an OCD-relevant mouse model.
“These findings are the first demonstration of increased strength of M2-striatal circuits in an OCD-relevant mouse model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
- Premisecitation
Stimulation of LOFC inputs into central striatum relieves hyperactivity in Sapap3-KOs.
“This hyperactivity is relieved by stimulation of lateral OFC (LOFC) inputs into central striatum, suggesting dysregulation of LOFC corticostriatal inputs to SPNs or fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burguie `re et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In SPNs, NMDA currents are increased proportionately more than AMPA currents in Sapap3-KOs.
“These data are consistent with the idea that SPN NMDA currents are increased proportionately more than AMPA currents in KOs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to in vivo striatal hyperactivity in Sapap3-KOs.
“These results suggest that increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to both in vivo striatal hyperactivity and compulsive behaviors”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Weakened LOFC input to central striatal SPNs may play a role in the generation of OCD-relevant compulsive behaviors.
“we observed weakened LOFC input to central striatal SPNs that may also play a role in the generation of OCD-relevant compulsive behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
- Interpretationreasoning
KOs could display enhanced habit expression.
“KOs could display enhanced habit expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
- Premisecitation
Both phenomena are enhanced in Sapap3-KOs.
“because both phenomena are enhanced in Sapap3-KOs (Chen et al., 2011)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Central striatum is a potential critical node for behavioral selection.
“These findings highlight central striatum as a potential critical node for behavioral selection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The upregulation of M2 input to central striatum results from increased AMPA and NMDA currents.
“The upregulation of M2 input to central striatum results from increased AMPA and NMDA currents”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Welch et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wan et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
- Interpretationreasoning
Normally balanced activity of M2 and LOFC is necessary to properly select goal-directed and habitual actions.
“normally balanced activity of M2 and LOFC is necessary to properly select goal-directed and habitual actions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Increased NMDA activity at M2 striatal synapses may lead to abnormal corticostriatal plasticity in an already strengthened projection.
“Increased NMDA activity at M2 striatal synapses may lead to abnormal corticostriatal plasticity in an already strengthened projection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Hyperactivity in pre-SMA-striatal circuits could promote compulsive behaviors through increased responsiveness of striatal SPNs.
“hyperactivity in pre-SMA-striatal circuits could promote compulsive behaviors through increased responsiveness of striatal SPNs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
- Interpretationown data
The ex vivo data do not directly explain baseline SPN hyperactivity in vivo.
“our ex vivo data do not directly explain baseline SPN hyperactivity in vivo”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 16
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe paper found no abnormalities in intrinsic striatal properties in KOs but found substantial alteration in cortical inputs to central striatum.
“We found no abnormalities in intrinsic striatal properties in KOs but found substantial alteration in cortical inputs to central striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFSI mean response reliability was greater in KOs but not significantly.
“FSI mean response reliability was greater in KOs, but not significantly”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere are no differences in paired-pulse ratio or EPSC decay kinetics in either SPNs or FSIs between genotypes.
“No differences in paired-pulse ratio (PPR) or EPSC decay kinetics were observed in either cell type (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIpsilateral M2 showed the highest proportion of labeled cells, significantly greater than the proportions in LOFC, MOFC, PL, and DLOFC.
“Ipsilateral M2 showed the highest proportion of labeled cells (WT: 44.3 Ϯ 3.9%; KO: 38.9 Ϯ 4.8%), which was significantly greater than the proportions in LOFC ( p Ͻ 0.05), MOFC ( p Ͻ 0.001), PL ( p Ͻ 0.001), and DLOFC ( p Ͻ 0.001, post hoc contrasts).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSapap3-KO mice exhibit hyperactivity in central striatum at baseline and during compulsive grooming.
“Furthermore, consistent with human OCD literature, they also exhibit hyperactivity in central striatum at baseline and during compulsive grooming (Burguie `re et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burguie `re et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll data were analyzed with genotype blind to the experimenter.
“All data were analyzed with genotype blind to the experimenter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPre-SMA/SMA cortical regions may play a role in the pathology and treatment of compulsive behavior disorders.
“and support a potential role for presupplementary/supplementary motor cortical regions in the pathology and treatment of compulsive behavior disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe experimenter was blind to genotype during slice recording.
“Brains were sliced for recording with experimenter blind to genotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenApproximately equal numbers of male and female mice were used.
“Approximately equal numbers of male and female mice were used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenOnly animals with confirmed injection sites in central striatum were used for analysis.
“Only animals with confirmed injection sites in central striatum were used for analysis (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationM2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection.
“M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gremel and Costa, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guo et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cao et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAcute slice electrophysiology experiments were designed to include approximately equal numbers of Sapap3-KOs and WTs.
“Acute slice electrophysiology experiments were designed to include approximately equal numbers of Sapap3-KOs and WTs, taking into account animal availability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningImages were manually thresholded so that signal:background ratios were similar across animals.
“To normalize differences in Fluoro-Gold brightness and background in different animals, images were then manually thresholded so that the signal:background ratios were similar across animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSections containing central striatum were examined to ensure appropriate targeting and spread of Fluoro-Gold before proceeding with cell counting.
“Sections containing central striatum (0.85-0.25 mm anteroposterior) were examined to ensure appropriate targeting and spread of Fluoro-Gold before proceeding with cell counting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAbnormally strengthened M2 input to central striatum leads to more initiations and fewer completions of grooming behavior sequences in Sapap3-KOs.
“This evidence supports the hypothesis that abnormally strengthened M2 input to central striatum leads to more initiations and fewer completions of grooming behavior sequences in Sapap3-KOs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
- Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHabit expression is dependent on endocannabinoid-mediated LTD.
“habit expression is dependent on endocannabinoid-mediated LTD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gremel et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationActivity in LOFC corticostriatal projections is essential for updating action-value associations.
“activity in LOFC corticostriatal projections is essential for updating action-value associations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gremel et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis heightened functional connectivity and increased response reliability could result in striatal neurons that are primed to respond to M2 activity, which in turn could increase the likelihood of initiating specific sequenced behaviors.
“This heightened functional connectivity and increased response reliability could result in striatal neurons that are primed to respond to M2 activity, which in turn could increase the likelihood of initiating specific sequenced behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationReduced activity in LOFC corticostriatal terminals is necessary for habit expression.
“reduced activity in LOFC corticostriatal terminals is necessary for habit expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gremel et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMouse central striatum corresponds to the human caudate head.
“We propose that mouse central striatum corresponds to the human caudate head”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe observed downregulation of LOFC corticostriatal inputs could further bias Sapap3-KOs toward decreased flexible action selection and increased compulsivity and/or habit formation.
“These findings suggest that our observed downregulation of LOFC corticostriatal inputs could further bias Sapap3-KOs toward decreased flexible action selection and increased compulsivity and/or habit formation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPathologically enhanced plasticity mechanisms may be present at M2 corticostriatal synapses, which could contribute to abnormal learning phenotypes and persistence of compulsive grooming behavior observed in Sapap3-KOs.
“This suggests that pathologically enhanced plasticity mechanisms may be present at M2 corticostriatal synapses, which could contribute to abnormal learning phenotypes (Burguie `re et al., 2013) and persistence of compulsive grooming behavior (Welch et al., 2007) observed in Sapap3-KOs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Burguière et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Welch et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStrengthened M2 drive and/or reduced LOFC input to central striatum could play a role in generating compulsive grooming behavior in Sapap3-KO mice.
“strengthened M2 drive and/or reduced LOFC input to central striatum could play a role in generating compulsive grooming behavior in Sapap3-KO mice”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationM2-striatal projections are critical for initiation of behavioral sequences.
“M2-striatal projections have been shown to be critical for initiation of behavioral sequences (Rothwell et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rothwell et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFSIs can tune SPN firing to task-relevant events.
“FSIs can tune SPN firing to task-relevant events (Lee et al., 2017;O'Hare et al., 2017;Owen et al., 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O'Hare et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Owen et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe ideal treatment intervention would involve closed-loop technology that could tune neural activity up or down depending on specific context, task requirements, and individuals' symptom levels.
“the ideal treatment intervention would involve closed-loop technology that could tune neural activity up or down depending on specific context, task requirements, and individuals' symptom levels”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIncreased FSI drive could contribute to enhanced neural activity specifically during performance of sequenced motor behaviors, such as grooming in Sapap3-KOs.
“Increased FSI drive could therefore contribute to enhanced neural activity specifically during performance of sequenced motor behaviors, such as grooming in Sapap3-KOs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFSI firing can potentiate activity in a subset of SPNs.
“other reports show that FSI firing can potentiate activity in a subset of SPNs (O'Hare et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Hare et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFSIs are canonically thought to strongly inhibit SPN firing.
“FSIs are canonically thought to strongly inhibit SPN firing (Owen et al., 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Owen et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDecreasing pre-SMA activity through low-frequency rTMS could be therapeutic.
“decreasing pre-SMA activity through low-frequency rTMS could be therapeutic”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIncreased drive to FSIs could also play a role in SPN hyperactivity.
“Increased drive to FSIs could also play a role in SPN hyperactivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe paper did not measure FSI-SPN synapses in this study.
“we did not measure FSI-SPN synapses in our study”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningChanges in FSI-SPN synaptic strength in KOs could affect interpretation of our findings.
“changes in FSI-SPN synaptic strength in KOs could affect interpretation of our findings”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPre-SMA hyperactivity in OCD patients is compensatory, with higher pre-SMA activity correlating with lower Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores.
“pre-SMA hyperactivity in OCD patients is compensatory, with higher pre-SMA activity correlating with lower Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores (van Velzen et al., 2014)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Velzen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf M2-central striatum circuits are specifically engaged during sequenced behaviors, such as grooming, this could lead to behavior-specific generation of larger evoked postsynaptic responses, resulting in striatal hyperactivity.
“If M2-central striatum circuits are specifically engaged during sequenced behaviors, such as grooming, this could lead to behavior-specific generation of larger evoked postsynaptic responses, resulting in striatal hyperactivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncreased reliability may cause increased drive of SPNs that we cannot capture with ex vivo physiology, especially if M2 itself is hyperactive or hypersynchronous in vivo.
“This increased reliability may cause increased drive of SPNs that we cannot capture with ex vivo physiology, especially if M2 itself is hyperactive or hypersynchronous in vivo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe paper's data highlight M2-striatal pathology in an OCD-relevant mouse model and support a novel conceptual model in which Sapap3-KO mice display a shift toward increased motor control and decreased associative control over central striatum.
“Our data highlight M2-striatal pathology in an OCDrelevant mouse model and support a novel conceptual model in which Sapap3-KO mice display a shift toward increased motor control and decreased associative control over central striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThe appropriate therapeutic intervention would be to use high-frequency rTMS to enhance compensation in OCD subjects whose pre-SMA activity is in the lower range.
“the appropriate therapeutic intervention would be to use high-frequency rTMS to enhance compensation in OCD subjects whose pre-SMA activity is in the lower range”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFunctional imaging studies have identified hyperactivity in pre-SMA in OCD subjects relative to healthy controls.
“functional imaging studies that have identified hyperactivity in pre-SMA in OCD subjects relative to healthy controls”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Yücel et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites de Wit et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Grützmann et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSPN hyperactivity has been described during compulsive grooming as well as at baseline.
“SPN hyperactivity has been described during compulsive grooming as well as at baseline (Burguie `re et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burguière et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningPre-SMA is a more important treatment target for decreasing compulsive behaviors in OCD and related disorders than previously suspected.
“pre-SMA is a more important treatment target for decreasing compulsive behaviors in OCD and related disorders than previously suspected”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThese findings support the potential clinical importance of further investigations of pre-SMA/SMA function in OCD patients.
“these findings support the potential clinical importance of further investigations of pre-SMA/SMA function in OCD patients”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
It is unclear whether striatal hyperactivity in OCD is due to intrinsic striatal dysfunction or abnormalities in corticostriatal inputs.
“it is unclear whether this hyperactivity is due to intrinsic striatal dysfunction or abnormalities in corticostriatal inputs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cellular and synaptic abnormalities that underlie striatal hyperactivity in OCD are unclear.
“However, the cellular and synaptic abnormalities that underlie this hyperactivity are unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The contribution of corticostriatal inputs from M2 to striatal hyperactivity in Sapap3-KOs has been unexplored.
“However, the contribution of corticostriatal inputs from M2 to striatal hyperactivity in Sapap3-KOs has been unexplored, despite the fact that M2 is the mouse homolog of pre-SMA, a promising treatment target.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
“a transgenic mouse model that exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior, Sapap3-KOs”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
“our ex vivo data do not directly explain baseline SPN hyperactivity in vivo”
The paper relies on this without support.
ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
“AAV2-hSyn-ChR2-EYFP was injected into M2 to selectively label M2 projections in central striatum.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LOFC neurons send inputs to a subregion of striatum ranging from dorsomedial to central striatum, with dense inputs in the central subregion.
“Consistently, it has repeatedly been reported that LOFC neurons send inputs to a subregion of the striatum ranging from the dorsomedial to the central striatum. Dense inputs are observed in the central subregion60–63.”
From Dissociable roles of prefrontal plasticity in decision-making strategy and execution of habitual behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [62]
The section “M2 and LOFC are the main sources of cortical input to central striatum” (page not available) reports LOFC neurons projecting to central striatum. The Discussion also describes prominent functional LOFC input there in wild-type mice. Our copy does not establish a projection range from dorsomedial to central striatum or show that inputs are densest in the central subregion. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNMDARs could also be altered in the Sapap3-KO model, as previous work suggested.
“However, NMDARs could also be altered in the Sapap3-KO model, as previous work suggested [9,22].”
From Projection-specific deficits in synaptic transmission in adult Sapap3-knockout mice (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
A recent study showed in 8-9 weeks old Sapap3-KO mice that the OFC projection to the DS is weakened.
“This result is in contrast with a recent study that showed in 8-9 weeks old Sapap3-KO mice that the OFC projection to the DS is weakened [22].”
From Projection-specific deficits in synaptic transmission in adult Sapap3-knockout mice (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
A similar finding in the Sapap3-KO model has been reported for the anterior secondary motor cortex (aM2) where AMPAR and NMDAR currents were increased with a net decreased A/N ratio.
“The observation is nevertheless worth noting, since a similar finding in the Sapap3-KO model has been reported for the anterior secondary motor cortex (aM2) where AMPAR and NMDAR currents were increased with a net decreased A/N ratio [22].”
From Projection-specific deficits in synaptic transmission in adult Sapap3-knockout mice (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
For the projection from the anterior aM2 to the DS, increased AMPAR responses have been shown.
“For the projection from the anterior aM2 to the DS increased AMPAR responses have been shown [22].”
From Projection-specific deficits in synaptic transmission in adult Sapap3-knockout mice (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
In the medial part of the central striatum, OFC terminals dominate over anterior secondary motor cortex terminals.
“However, the expression in the aM2 was clearly weaker than in the OFC and we recorded cells in the medial part of the central striatum (Fig. S2e), where OFC terminals dominate over anterior secondary motor cortex terminals [22].”
From Projection-specific deficits in synaptic transmission in adult Sapap3-knockout mice (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
LOFC-to-FSI sample sizes are reversed between the figure and table
MinorFigure 4 assigns 5 animals and 10 cells to WT and 10 animals and 21 cells to KO. Table 2 assigns those same genotype-specific counts in the opposite direction for LOFC stimulation PPR.
“E, LOFC-evoked EPSCs in FSIs were no different in KOs and WTs (WT: 563.38 pA, IQR ϭ 661.69 pA, 5 animals, 10 cells; KO: 509.81 pA, IQR ϭ 680.86 pA, 10 animals, 21 cells; Z ϭ 0.57, p ϭ 0.57, WRST).”
“LOFC stimulation PPR 0.36, 0.23 0.31, 0.19 0.39 0.27, 0.21 0.29, 0.11 0.90 N (animals, cells) 10, 21 5, 10 12, 33 5, 15”
Optogenetic pulse duration differs between Methods and figure legends
MinorThe Methods specify 1 ms light pulses, but the legends for Figures 4 and 5 specify 10 ms pulses for the optogenetic stimulation.
“Optogenetically evoked synaptic responses were elicited with two 1 ms pulses of light (100 ms IPI) filtered at 470 nm, delivered through the 60ϫ objective of the rig microscope.”
“B, C, Brief pulses of 470 nm light (1 mW, 10 ms pulse, 100 ms IPI) evoked synaptic release from ChR2-infected M2 terminals”
Conflicting p-values for M2-to-FSI response reliability
MinorThe Results report p = 0.35 for the FSI reliability comparison, whereas the Figure 5 legend reports p = 0.22 for that comparison.
“Sapap3-KOs also exhibited increased response reliability relative to WTs in SPNs (100%, p Ͻ 0.01, WRST) and FSIs (95.0%, p ϭ 0.35, WRST; Fig. 5F ).”
“FSI mean response reliability was greater in KOs, but not significantly (WT 85.88%, SEM ϭ 5.31%; KO 95, SEM ϭ 4.21%; Z ϭ Ϫ0.93, p ϭ 0.22, WRST).”
LOFC-to-SPN KO animal count differs between figure and table
MinorFigure 4 reports 3 KO animals and 15 cells for LOFC-evoked SPN EPSCs. Table 2 reports 5 KO animals and 15 cells for the LOFC-stimulation SPN PPR measurements, leaving the number of animals contributing those 15 cells inconsistent.
“F, SPNs in central striatum had significantly smaller LOFC-evoked EPSCs in KOs relative to WTs (WT: 444.84 pA, IQR ϭ 637.43 pA, 12 animals, 33 cells; KO: 137.92 pA, IQR ϭ 110.20 pA, 3 animals, 15 cells; Z ϭ 3.43, p ϭ 6.14 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 , WRST).”
“LOFC stimulation PPR 0.36, 0.23 0.31, 0.19 0.39 0.27, 0.21 0.29, 0.11 0.90 N (animals, cells) 10, 21 5, 10 12, 33 5, 15”
Cites
The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
Paxinos, G. (2001) · Cited by 12,859 · see citing works
The Epidemiology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Five US Communities
Karno, M. (1988) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800360042006 · Cited by 1,340 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(TS) (Leckman et al., 2010), grooming disorders (e.g., skin-picking, trichotillomania) (Chamberlain et al., 2009; Flessner et al., 2012), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (Karno et al., 1988; Ayuso-Mateos, 2006; Menzies et al., 2008), little is known about their underlying neural mechanisms.”
BackgroundMenzies, L., Chamberlain, S. R., Laird, A. R., Thelen, S. M., Sahakian, B. J., & Bullmore, E. T. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.09.005 · Cited by 1,190 · cited 6× · see citing works
“, 2013), studies demonstrating aberrant activity in corticostriatal circuits in OCD patients (Chamberlain et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Harrison et al., 2009; Del Casale et al., 2011; Figee et al., 2013; Nakamae et al., 2014) suggest that cortical regions may be useful targets for noninvasive neurostimulation vi…”
BackgroundInfluentialRauch, S. L. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010062008 · Cited by 880 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…both hyperactivity in the striatum (caudate head) and increased corticostriatal functional connectivity at baseline and when symptoms are expressed (Rauch et al., 1994, 1997; Saxena et al., 1998; Maia et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Chamberlain et al., 2009; Harrison et al., 2009; Leckman et…”
BackgroundGreenberg, B. D., Gabriels, L. A., Malone, D. A., Rezai, A. R., Friehs, G. M., Okun, M. S., Shapira, N. A., Foote, K. D., Cosyns, P. R., Kubu, C. S., et al. (2010) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.55 · Cited by 867 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although striatal deep brain stimulation has reported efficacy in OCD (Greenberg et al., 2010; Figee et al., 2013), studies demonstrating aberrant activity in corticostriatal circuits in OCD patients (Chamberlain et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Harrison et al., 2009; Del Casale et al., 2011;…”
BackgroundCortico-striatal synaptic defects and OCD-like behaviours in Sapap3-mutant mice
Welch, J. M., Lu, J., Rodriguiz, R. M., Trotta, N. C., Peca, J., Ding, J.-D., Feliciano, C., Chen, M., Adams, J. P., Luo, J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06104 · Cited by 852 · cited 10× · see citing works
“This suggests that pathologically enhanced plasticity mechanisms may be present at M2 corticostriatal synapses, which could contribute to abnormal learning phenotypes (Burguière et al., 2013) and persistence of compulsive grooming behavior (Welch et al., 2007) observed in Sapap3-KOs.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialNeuroimaging and frontal–subcortical circuitry in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Saxena, S., Brody, A. L., Schwartz, J. M., & Baxter, L. R. (1998) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/s0007125000297870 · Cited by 831 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We first focused on LOFC projections, as this region has been implicated in compulsive behavior (Saxena et al., 1998; Maltby et al., 2005; Chamberlain et al., 2008; Burguière et al., 2013) and related behavioral constructs, including action selection, cognitive flexibility, and reversal learning…”
BackgroundInfluentialFlow of cortical activity underlying a tactile decision in mice
Guo, Z. V., Li, N., Huber, D., Ophir, E., Gutnisky, D., Ting, J. T., Feng, G., & Svoboda, K. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.020 · Cited by 715 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar to SMA/pre-SMA in humans and primates (Isoda and Hikosaka, 2007), M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection (Gremel and Costa, 2013; Guo et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Rothwell et al., 2015; Barthas and Kwan, 2017).”
ResultA motor cortex circuit for motor planning and movement
Li, N., Chen, T.-W., Guo, Z. V., Gerfen, C., & Svoboda, K. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14178 · Cited by 578 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Because M2 is associated with planning of sequenced movements (Sul et al., 2011; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015) and is thought to be homologous to pre-SMA (which is implicated in OCD) (Mantovani et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAltered corticostriatal functional connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Harrison, B. J., Soriano-Mas, C., Pujol, J., Ortiz, H., López-Solà, M., Hernández-Ribas, R., Deus, J., Alonso, P., Yücel, M., Pantelis, C., et al. (2009) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.152 · Cited by 571 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…functional connectivity at baseline and when symptoms are expressed (Rauch et al., 1994, 1997; Saxena et al., 1998; Maia et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Chamberlain et al., 2009; Harrison et al., 2009; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; Denys et al., 2013; Figee et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialChamberlain, S. R., Menzies, L., Hampshire, A., Suckling, J., Fineberg, N. A., del Campo, N., Aitken, M., Craig, K., Owen, A. M., Bullmore, E. T., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154433 · Cited by 550 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We first focused on LOFC projections, as this region has been implicated in compulsive behavior (Saxena et al., 1998; Maltby et al., 2005; Chamberlain et al., 2008; Burguière et al., 2013) and related behavioral constructs, including action selection, cognitive flexibility, and reversal learning…”
BackgroundDeep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Figee, M., Luigjes, J., Smolders, R., Valencia-Alfonso, C.-E., van Wingen, G., de Kwaasteniet, B., Mantione, M., Ooms, P., de Koning, P., Vulink, N., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3344 · Cited by 466 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…functional connectivity at baseline and when symptoms are expressed (Rauch et al., 1994, 1997; Saxena et al., 1998; Maia et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Chamberlain et al., 2009; Harrison et al., 2009; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; Denys et al., 2013; Figee et al., 2013).”
BackgroundOptogenetic stimulation of lateral orbitofronto-striatal pathway suppresses compulsive behaviors
Burguière, E., Monteiro, P., Feng, G., & Graybiel, A. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232380 · Cited by 457 · cited 8× · see citing works
“In addition, SPN hyperactivity has been described during compulsive grooming as well as at baseline (Burguière et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSwitching from automatic to controlled action by monkey medial frontal cortex
Isoda, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1830 · Cited by 430 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar to SMA/pre-SMA in humans and primates (Isoda and Hikosaka, 2007), M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection (Gremel and Costa, 2013; Guo et al.”
ResultNeural correlates of tic generation in Tourette syndrome: an event-related functional MRI study
Bohlhalter, S. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl050 · Cited by 426 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, pre-SMA activity has been associated with the “urge” to move in both TS patients and healthy subjects (Bohlhalter et al., 2006; Neuner et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMallet, N. P., Moine, C. L., Charpier, S., & Gonon, F. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5027-04.2005 · Cited by 380 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…mice (Burguière et al., 2013) reflected differences in excitatory inputs to central striatum, which could augment SPN activity directly or via decreasing feedforward inhibition mediated by FSIs (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997; Mallet et al., 2005; Gittis et al., 2010, 2011; Berke, 2011).”
BackgroundDistinct Roles of Rodent Orbitofrontal and Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Decision Making
Sul, J. H., Kim, H., Huh, N., Lee, D., & Jung, M. W. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.033 · Cited by 372 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Generally, LOFC is known to support functions essential for flexible selection of be- haviors, including reversal learning (Schoenbaum et al., 2002; Bohn et al., 2003; Sul et al., 2010).”
BackgroundDistinct Roles of GABAergic Interneurons in the Regulation of Striatal Output Pathways
Gittis, A. H., Nelson, A., Thwin, M. T., Palop, J. J., & Kreitzer, A. C. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4870-09.2010 · Cited by 364 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…mice (Burguière et al., 2013) reflected differences in excitatory inputs to central striatum, which could augment SPN activity directly or via decreasing feedforward inhibition mediated by FSIs (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997; Mallet et al., 2005; Gittis et al., 2010, 2011; Berke, 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe neural bases of obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adults
Maia, T. V., Cooney, R. E., & Peterson, B. S. (2008) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579408000606 · Cited by 362 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and increased corticostriatal functional connectivity at baseline and when symptoms are expressed (Rauch et al., 1994, 1997; Saxena et al., 1998; Maia et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Chamberlain et al., 2009; Harrison et al., 2009; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; Denys et…”
BackgroundGoal-directed learning and obsessive-compulsive disorder
Gillan, C. M., & Robbins, T. W. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0475 · Cited by 348 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In Sapap3-KO mice, the shift toward M2 motor control and away from LOFC associative control of central striatum may particularly interfere with flexible switching between habitual and goaldirected behaviors, which has been implicated in OCD symptomatology (Gillan and Robbins, 2014).”
BackgroundMaltby, N., Tolin, D. F., Worhunsky, P., O'Keefe, T. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.041 · Cited by 331 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Consistent with this idea, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), which are hyperactive in OCD patients (Maltby et al., 2005; Yücel et al., 2007; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; de Wit et al., 2012; Grützmann et al., 2016), have been identified as promising targets for rTM…”
BackgroundInfluentialDeschênes, M., Bourassa, J., & Pinault, D. (1994) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(94)91974-7 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Orbitofrontal lesions in rats impair reversal but not acquisition of go, no-go odor discriminations
Schoenbaum, G. M., Nugent, S. L., Saddoris, M. P., & Setlow, B. (2002) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200205070-00030 · Cited by 320 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Generally, LOFC is known to support functions essential for flexible selection of be- haviors, including reversal learning (Schoenbaum et al., 2002; Bohn et al., 2003; Sul et al., 2010).”
Backgroundde Wit, S. J., de Vries, F. E., van der Werf, Y. D., Cath, D. C., Heslenfeld, D. J., Veltman, E. M., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., Veltman, D. J., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2012) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010073 · Cited by 303 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…movements (Sul et al., 2011; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015) and is thought to be homologous to pre-SMA (which is implicated in OCD) (Mantovani et al., 2010; de Wit et al., 2012), we investigated whether M2 was a source of upregulated excitatory drive to central striatum in Sapap3-KOs (Fig.”
Background(1997) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.9.4.568 · Cited by 301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…both hyperactivity in the striatum (caudate head) and increased corticostriatal functional connectivity at baseline and when symptoms are expressed (Rauch et al., 1994, 1997; Saxena et al., 1998; Maia et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Chamberlain et al., 2009; Harrison et al., 2009; Leckman et…”
BackgroundMantovani, A., Simpson, H. B., Fallon, B. A., Rossi, S., & Lisanby, S. H. (2010) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145709990435 · Cited by 281 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…sequenced movements (Sul et al., 2011; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015) and is thought to be homologous to pre-SMA (which is implicated in OCD) (Mantovani et al., 2010; de Wit et al., 2012), we investigated whether M2 was a source of upregulated excitatory drive to central striatum in…”
BackgroundTakahashi, Y. K., Roesch, M. R., Stalnaker, T. A., Haney, R. Z., Calu, D. J., Taylor, A. R., Burke, K. A., & Schoenbaum, G. M. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.005 · Cited by 277 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…1998; Maltby et al., 2005; Chamberlain et al., 2008; Burguière et al., 2013) and related behavioral constructs, including action selection, cognitive flexibility, and reversal learning (Schoenbaum et al., 2002; Takahashi et al., 2009; Sul et al., 2010; Dalton et al., 2016; Gremel et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSecondary Motor Cortex: Where ‘Sensory’ Meets ‘Motor’ in the Rodent Frontal Cortex
Barthas, F., & Kwan, A. C. (2016) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.11.006 · Cited by 261 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar to SMA/pre-SMA in humans and primates (Isoda and Hikosaka, 2007), M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection (Gremel and Costa, 2013; Guo et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Rothwell et al., 2015; Barthas and Kwan, 2017).”
ResultFunctional and Biochemical Alterations of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Yücel, M., Harrison, B. J., Wood, S. J., Fornito, A., Wellard, R. M., Pujol, J., Clarke, K., Phillips, M. L., Kyrios, M., Velakoulis, D., et al. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.946 · Cited by 255 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…with this idea, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), which are hyperactive in OCD patients (Maltby et al., 2005; Yücel et al., 2007; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; de Wit et al., 2012; Grützmann et al., 2016), have been identified as promising…”
BackgroundEndocannabinoid Modulation of Orbitostriatal Circuits Gates Habit Formation
Gremel, C. M., Chancey, J. H., Atwood, B. K., Luo, G., Neve, R., Ramakrishnan, C., Deisseroth, K., Lovinger, D. M., & Costa, R. M. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.043 · Cited by 251 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Consistent with this, Gremel et al. (2016) reported that activity in LOFC corticostriatal projections is essential for updating action-value associations (Gremel et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialRole of rodent secondary motor cortex in value-based action selection
Sul, J. H., Jo, S., Lee, D., & Jung, M. W. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2881 · Cited by 221 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Because M2 is associated with planning of sequenced movements (Sul et al., 2011; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015) and is thought to be homologous to pre-SMA (which is implicated in OCD) (Mantovani et al.”
BackgroundBerlim, M. T., Neufeld, N. H., & Van den Eynde, F. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.03.022 · Cited by 219 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(OFC) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), which are hyperactive in OCD patients (Maltby et al., 2005; Yücel et al., 2007; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; de Wit et al., 2012; Grützmann et al., 2016), have been identified as promising targets for rTMS (Berlim et al., 2013).”
BackgroundParthasarathy, H. B., & Graybiel, A. M. (1997) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-07-02477.1997 · Cited by 214 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…mice (Burguière et al., 2013) reflected differences in excitatory inputs to central striatum, which could augment SPN activity directly or via decreasing feedforward inhibition mediated by FSIs (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997; Mallet et al., 2005; Gittis et al., 2010, 2011; Berke, 2011).”
BackgroundFunctional neuroimaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Del Casale, A., Kotzalidis, G. D., Rapinesi, C., Serata, D., Ambrosi, E., Simonetti, A., Pompili, M., Ferracuti, S., Tatarelli, R., & Girardi, P. (2011) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000325223 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
<i>Sapap3</i> and pathological grooming in humans: Results from the OCD collaborative genetics study
Bienvenu, O. J., Wang, Y., Shugart, Y. Y., Welch, J. M., Grados, M. A., Fyer, A. J., Rauch, S. L., McCracken, J. T., Rasmussen, S. A., Murphy, D. L., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30897 · Cited by 207 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mutations in the Sapap3 gene, which encodes the synapse-associated protein 90/ postsynaptic density-95-associated protein, have been associated with TS, pathological grooming disorders, and OCD in humans (Bienvenu et al., 2009; Züchner et al., 2009; Crane et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSelective Inhibition of Striatal Fast-Spiking Interneurons Causes Dyskinesias
Gittis, A. H., Leventhal, D., Fensterheim, B. A., Pettibone, J. R., Berke, J. D., & Kreitzer, A. C. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3875-11.2011 · Cited by 201 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…mice (Burguière et al., 2013) reflected differences in excitatory inputs to central striatum, which could augment SPN activity directly or via decreasing feedforward inhibition mediated by FSIs (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997; Mallet et al., 2005; Gittis et al., 2010, 2011; Berke, 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNeurobiological Substrates of Tourette's Disorder
Leckman, J. F., Bloch, M. H., Smith, M. E., Larabi, D. I., & Hampson, M. (2010) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1089/cap.2009.0118 · Cited by 198 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…prominent, disabling, and notoriously treatment-resistant, symptoms in multiple severe neuropsychiatric disorders, including Tourette syndrome (TS) (Leckman et al., 2010), grooming disorders (e.g., skin-picking, trichotillomania) (Chamberlain et al., 2009; Flessner et al., 2012), and…”
BackgroundInfluentialMultiple rare SAPAP3 missense variants in trichotillomania and OCD
Züchner, S., Wendland, J. R., Ashley-Koch, A. E., Collins, A. L., Tran-Viet, K. N., Quinn, K., Timpano, K. C., Cuccaro, M. L., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Steffens, D. C., et al. (2009) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.83 · Cited by 196 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mutations in the Sapap3 gene, which encodes the synapse-associated protein 90/ postsynaptic density-95-associated protein, have been associated with TS, pathological grooming disorders, and OCD in humans (Bienvenu et al., 2009; Züchner et al., 2009; Crane et al., 2011).”
BackgroundImaging the where and when of tic generation and resting state networks in adult Tourette patients
Neuner, I., Werner, C. J., Arrubla, J., Stöcker, T., Ehlen, C., Wegener, H. P., Schneider, F. W., & Shah, N. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00362 · Cited by 186 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, pre-SMA activity has been associated with the “urge” to move in both TS patients and healthy subjects (Bohlhalter et al., 2006; Neuner et al., 2014).”
BackgroundDalton, G. L., Wang, N. Y., Phillips, A. G., & Floresco, S. B. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3366-15.2016 · Cited by 184 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…1998; Maltby et al., 2005; Chamberlain et al., 2008; Burguière et al., 2013) and related behavioral constructs, including action selection, cognitive flexibility, and reversal learning (Schoenbaum et al., 2002; Takahashi et al., 2009; Sul et al., 2010; Dalton et al., 2016; Gremel et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMaintenance of superior learning and memory function in NR2B transgenic mice during ageing
Cao, X., Cui, Z., Feng, R., Tang, Y., Qin, Z., Mei, B., & Tsien, J. Z. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05431.x · Cited by 171 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, it has been shown that KOs have higher levels of the NR2B subunit in the striatum relative to WTs (Welch et al., 2007), and increased NR2B expression in hippocampus has been associated with enhanced LTP and heightened learning (Cao et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009).”
BackgroundDopaminergic activity in Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder
Denys, D. A. J. P., de Vries, F., Cath, D. C., Figee, M., Vulink, N. C. C., Veltman, D. J., van der Doef, T. F., Boellaard, R., Westenberg, H. G. M., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., et al. (2013) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.05.012 · Cited by 167 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…functional connectivity at baseline and when symptoms are expressed (Rauch et al., 1994, 1997; Saxena et al., 1998; Maia et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Chamberlain et al., 2009; Harrison et al., 2009; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; Denys et al., 2013; Figee et al., 2013).”
BackgroundResponse Inhibition and Interference Control in Obsessive–Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
van Velzen, L. S., Vriend, C., de Wit, S. J., & van den Heuvel, O. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00419 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Lévesque, M., Charara, A., Gagnon, S., Parent, A., & Deschênes, M. (1996) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(95)01333-4 · Cited by 151 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although we did not observe a strong laminar pattern, labeled cells were present in layer V, as anticipated based on past work (Levesque et al., 1996).”
ResultOwen, S. F., Berke, J. D., & Kreitzer, A. C. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.005 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…mice (Burguière et al., 2013) reflected differences in excitatory inputs to central striatum, which could augment SPN activity directly or via decreasing feedforward inhibition mediated by FSIs (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997; Mallet et al., 2005; Gittis et al., 2010, 2011; Berke, 2011).”
BackgroundMotor Learning Consolidates Arc-Expressing Neuronal Ensembles in Secondary Motor Cortex
Cao, V. Y., Ye, Y., Mastwal, S. S., Ren, M., Coon, M., Liu, Q., Costa, R. M., & Wang, K. H. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.022 · Cited by 142 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similar to SMA/pre-SMA in humans and primates (Isoda and Hikosaka, 2007), M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection (Gremel and Costa, 2013; Guo et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Rothwell et al., 2015; Barthas and Kwan, 2017).”
Functional Properties of Striatal Fast-Spiking Interneurons
Berke, J. D. (2011) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00045 · Cited by 140 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…mice (Burguière et al., 2013) reflected differences in excitatory inputs to central striatum, which could augment SPN activity directly or via decreasing feedforward inhibition mediated by FSIs (Parthasarathy and Graybiel, 1997; Mallet et al., 2005; Gittis et al., 2010, 2011; Berke, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodLee, K., Holley, S. M., Shobe, J. L., Chong, N. C., Cepeda, C., Levine, M. S., & Masmanidis, S. C. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.033 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Input- and Output-Specific Regulation of Serial Order Performance by Corticostriatal Circuits
Rothwell, P. E., Hayton, S. J., Sun, G. L., Fuccillo, M. V., Lim, B. K., & Malenka, R. C. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.035 · Cited by 127 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Of particular interest, M2-striatal projections have been shown to be critical for initiation of behavioral sequences (Rothwell et al., 2015).”
BackgroundResultLuk, K. C., & Sadikot, A. F. (2001) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00038-0 · Cited by 126 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Because FSIs make up only 1% of the striatal cell population (Luk and Sadikot, 2001; Berke, 2011), we used a transgenic fluorescent strategy to target these neurons using acute slice electrophysiology.”
MethodTrichotillomania: neurobiology and treatment
Chamberlain, S. R., Odlaug, B. L., Boulougouris, V., Fineberg, N. A., & Grant, J. E. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.002 · Cited by 126 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…neuropsychiatric disorders, including Tourette syndrome (TS) (Leckman et al., 2010), grooming disorders (e.g., skin-picking, trichotillomania) (Chamberlain et al., 2009; Flessner et al., 2012), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (Karno et al., 1988; Ayuso-Mateos, 2006; Menzies et al.,…”
BackgroundWan, Y., Ade, K. K., Caffall, Z., Ilcim Ozlu, M., Eroglu, C., Feng, G., & Calakos, N. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.008 · Cited by 118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sapap3-KOs demonstrate ex vivo abnormalities in striatal spiny projection neurons (SPNs), including both increased NMDAreceptor mediated and reduced AMPA-receptor mediated transmission in dorsal striatum (Welch et al., 2007; Wan et al., 2011, 2014; Ade et al., 2016).”
BackgroundXu, Z., Chen, R., Gu, Q.-H., Yan, J.-Z., Wang, S., Liu, S., & Lü, W. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1014-09.2009 · Cited by 115 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For instance, it has been shown that KOs have higher levels of the NR2B subunit in the striatum relative to WTs (Welch et al., 2007), and increased NR2B expression in hippocampus has been associated with enhanced LTP and heightened learning (Cao et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009).”
Background<i>Sapap3</i> Deletion Causes mGluR5-Dependent Silencing of AMPAR Synapses
Wan, Y., Feng, G., & Calakos, N. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2533-11.2011 · Cited by 101 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…been shown to have alterations in NMDA signaling that can impact synaptic strength, including differential expression of NMDA receptor subunits, increased NMDAmediated currents in dorsolateral striatum, and reduced AMPA/ NMDA ratios in dorsolateral striatum (Welch et al., 2007; Wan et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAde, K. K., Wan, Y., Hamann, H. C., O’Hare, J. K., Guo, W., Quian, A., Kumar, S., Bhagat, S., Rodriguiz, R. M., Wetsel, W. C., et al. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.04.023 · Cited by 84 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sapap3-KOs demonstrate ex vivo abnormalities in striatal spiny projection neurons (SPNs), including both increased NMDAreceptor mediated and reduced AMPA-receptor mediated transmission in dorsal striatum (Welch et al., 2007; Wan et al., 2011, 2014; Ade et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSapap3 Deletion Anomalously Activates Short-Term Endocannabinoid-Mediated Synaptic Plasticity
Chen, M., Wan, Y., Ade, K., Ting, J., Feng, G., & Calakos, N. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1701-11.2011 · Cited by 82 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…reduced activity in LOFC corticostriatal terminals is necessary for habit expression, and habit expression is dependent on endocannabinoid-mediated LTD (Gremel et al., 2016); because both phenomena are enhanced in Sapap3-KOs (Chen et al., 2011), KOs could display enhanced habit expression.”
BackgroundPresupplementary Motor Area Contributes to Altered Error Monitoring in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Grützmann, R., Endraß, T., Kaufmann, C., Allen, E. A., Eichele, T., & Kathmann, N. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.010 · Cited by 81 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(OFC) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), which are hyperactive in OCD patients (Maltby et al., 2005; Yücel et al., 2007; Leckman et al., 2010; Del Casale et al., 2011; de Wit et al., 2012; Grützmann et al., 2016), have been identified as promising targets for rTMS (Berlim et al., 2013).”
BackgroundO’Hare, J. K., Li, H., Kim, N., Gaidis, E., Ade, K. K., Beck, J. M., Yin, H. H., & Calakos, N. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.26231 · Cited by 79 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While FSIs are canonically thought to strongly inhibit SPN firing (Owen et al., 2018), other reports show that FSI firing can potentiate activity in a subset of SPNs (O’Hare et al., 2017).”
BackgroundPremotor cortex is critical for goal-directed actions
Gremel, C. M., & Costa, R. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00110 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similar to SMA/pre-SMA in humans and primates (Isoda and Hikosaka, 2007), M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection (Gremel and Costa, 2013; Guo et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Rothwell et al., 2015; Barthas and Kwan, 2017).”
ResultFamily‐based genetic association study of DLGAP3 in Tourette Syndrome
Crane, J. N., Fagerness, J. A., Osiecki, L., Gunnell, B., Stewart, S. E., Pauls, D. L., & Scharf, J. M. (2010) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.31134 · Cited by 73 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Mutations in the Sapap3 gene, which encodes the synapse-associated protein 90/ postsynaptic density-95-associated protein, have been associated with TS, pathological grooming disorders, and OCD in humans (Bienvenu et al., 2009; Züchner et al., 2009; Crane et al., 2011).”
BackgroundOrbital prefrontal cortex and guidance of instrumental behaviour in rats under reversal conditions
Bohn, I., Giertler, C., & Hauber, W. (2003) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00008-1 · Cited by 65 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generally, LOFC is known to support functions essential for flexible selection of be- haviors, including reversal learning (Schoenbaum et al., 2002; Bohn et al., 2003; Sul et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFlessner, C., Knopik, V., & McGeary, J. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.039 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…including Tourette syndrome (TS) (Leckman et al., 2010), grooming disorders (e.g., skin-picking, trichotillomania) (Chamberlain et al., 2009; Flessner et al., 2012), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (Karno et al., 1988; Ayuso-Mateos, 2006; Menzies et al., 2008), little is known about…”
BackgroundAltered fronto-striatal fiber topography and connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Nakamae, T., Sakai, Y., Abe, Y., Nishida, S., Fukui, K., Yamada, K., Kubota, M., Denys, D., & Narumoto, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112075 · Cited by 28 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2013), studies demonstrating aberrant activity in corticostriatal circuits in OCD patients (Chamberlain et al., 2008; Menzies et al., 2008; Harrison et al., 2009; Del Casale et al., 2011; Figee et al., 2013; Nakamae et al., 2014) suggest that cortical regions may be useful targets for noninvasive neurostimulation vi…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dorsal Striatal Circuits for Habits, Compulsions and Addictions
Lipton, D. M., Gonzales, B. J., & Citri, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00028 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
“They found that in the SAPAP3 mutant, lOFC input to striatal SPNs was reduced in strength, while M2 input to both SPNs and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs) in striatum was increased 6-fold, suggesting that it is M2, and not lOFC inputs, that drive compulsive grooming (Corbit et al., 2019).”
BackgroundNINscope, a versatile miniscope for multi-region circuit investigations
de Groot, A., van den Boom, B. J. G., van Genderen, R. M., Coppens, J. E., van Veldhuijzen, J., Bos, J., Hoedemaker, H., Negrello, M., Willuhn, I., Zeeuw, C. I. D., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49987 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
“The OFC and M2 can differentially regulate the activity of neurons in specific DS regions in vitro (Corbit et al., 2019), with”
BackgroundMethodResultFrom compulsivity to compulsion: the neural basis of compulsive disorders
Robbins, T. W., Banca, P., & Belin, D. (2024) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00807-z · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Cortico-basal ganglia plasticity in motor learning
Roth, R. H., & Ding, J. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.06.014 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Aberrant habit formation in the Sapap3-knockout mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Hadjas, L. C., Lüscher, C., & Simmler, L. D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48637-9 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Gated feedforward inhibition in the frontal cortex releases goal-directed action
Kim, J., Ma, D.-H., Jung, E., Choi, I., & Lee, S. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00910-9 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Ramírez-Armenta, K. I., Alatriste-León, H., Verma-Rodríguez, A. K., Llanos-Moreno, A., Ramírez‐Jarquín, J. O., & Tecuapetla, F. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01161-9 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“In another study, striatal medium spiny neurons showed an increased response to the in-vitro optogenetic activation of M2 terminals in the striatum in the Sapap3-KO mice, which suggests a dysregulation of activity in the cortico-striatal circuit [24].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLamothe, H., Schreiweis, C., Mondragón-González, S. L., Rebbah, S., Lavielle, O., Mallet, L., & Burguière, E. (2023) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02323-7 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Thus, reconsidering cortico-striatal circuitry as a substrate for pathological RBs and taking into account specific indications of an implication of the sensorimotor cortico-striatal loops also in the Sapap3 mice [28, 40], we here raised the question whether compulsive-like self-grooming in Sapap3 mice might be comple…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialProjection-specific deficits in synaptic transmission in adult Sapap3-knockout mice
Hadjas, L. C., Schartner, M. M., Cand, J., Creed, M. C., Pascoli, V., Lüscher, C., & Simmler, L. D. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0747-3 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Simmler, L. D., & Ozawa, T. (2019) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104464 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Hyperactivity of indirect pathway-projecting spiny projection neurons promotes compulsive behavior
Piantadosi, S. C., Manning, E. E., Chamberlain, B. L., Hyde, J., LaPalombara, Z., Bannon, N. M., Pierson, J. L., Namboodiri, V. M. K., & Ahmari, S. E. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48331-z · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“We have shown that M2 connectivity to both central striatal SPNs and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs), whichstrongly inhibitnearby SPNs 79 – 81 , issigni fi cantlyincreased in KO mice relative to WTs 37 .”
Self-citationSoto, J. S., Neupane, C., Kaur, M., Pandey, V., Wohlschlegel, J. A., & Khakh, B. S. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.07.019 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Past studies 27,47–49 assessed EPSCs in mice at ages when overt behavioral symptoms do not occur.”
BackgroundThe Psychopharmacology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Preclinical Roadmap
Szechtman, H., Harvey, B. H., Woody, E. Z., & Hoffman, K. L. (2019) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.119.017772 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Sap90/postsynaptic density protein-95–associated protein 3 (Sapap3) null mice show compulsive-like grooming and abnormalities in glutamatergic neurotransmission and function (Welch et al., 2007; Burguière et al., 2013; Wan et al., 2014; Corbit et al., 2019).”
BackgroundManning, E. E., Wang, A. Y., Saikali, L. M., Winner, A. S., & Ahmari, S. E. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88769-5 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationEhmer, I., Feenstra, M., Willuhn, I., & Denys, D. (2020) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107162 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Secondary motor cortex: Broadcasting and biasing animal's decisions through long-range circuits
Yang, J.-H., & Kwan, A. C. (2020) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2020.11.008 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Yang, Z., Wu, G., Liu, M., Sun, X., Xu, Q., Zhang, C., & Lei, H. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.045 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Individual differences in stereotypy and neuron subtype translatome with TrkB deletion
Engeln, M., Song, Y., Chandra, R., La, A. M., Fox, M. E., Evans, B., Turner, M. D., Thomas, S., Francis, T. C., Hertzano, R. P., et al. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0746-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Piantadosi, S. C., McClain, L. L., Klei, L., Wang, J., Chamberlain, B. L., Springer, S. A., Lewis, D. A., Devlin, B., & Ahmari, S. E. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01290-1 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationDavis, G. L., Minerva, A. R., Lario, A., Simmler, L. D., Rodríguez, C. I., & Gunaydin, L. A. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26247-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Closed-loop recruitment of striatal interneurons prevents compulsive-like grooming behaviors
Mondragón-González, S. L., Schreiweis, C., & Burguière, E. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01633-3 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“…grooming in the Sapap3 -KO mice is also supported by recent studies describing abnormal synaptic properties of striatal PVI in this animal model 40 as well as by observations in other mouse models suffering from pathological repetitive behaviors where abnormally low PVI density in striatal…”
Sheng, Z., Liu, Q., Cheng, C., Li, M., Barash, J., Kofke, W. A., Shen, Y., & Xie, Z. (2022) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.027 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Mantovani, A., Neri, F., D’Urso, G., Mencarelli, L., Tatti, E., Momi, D., Menardi, A., Sprugnoli, G., Santarnecchi, E., & Rossi, S. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.030 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Animal Models for OCD Research
Chamberlain, B. L., & Ahmari, S. E. (2021) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2020_196 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, Y., Liao, J., Li, Q., Zhang, X., Liu, L., Yan, J., Zhang, D., Yan, H., & Yue, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681701 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Furthermore, in OCD-relevant mouse model, M2 postsynaptic responses in the central striatum were significantly increased, which suggested that strengthened M2-striatal inputs might contribute in striatal hyperactivity and compulsive behaviors, where M2 is homologous to preSMA/SMA in human (63).”
BackgroundSAPAP Scaffold Proteins: From Synaptic Function to Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Bai, Y., Wang, H., & Li, C. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11233815 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“central striatum [103] Inhibition of striatal cells increases grooming behavior; in‐ hibition of striatal indirect pathway neurons decreases grooming [105] Striatum ═ mEPSC amplitude/frequency (PV+ cells), ═ PPR,”
BackgroundInfluentialGorodetsky, C., Mithani, K., Breitbart, S. C., Yan, H., Zhang, K., Gouveia, F. V., Warsi, N. M., Suresh, H., Wong, S. M., Huber, J. F., et al. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.12.001 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Neurexin1α Differentially Regulates Synaptic Efficacy within Striatal Circuits
Davatolhagh, M. F., & Fuccillo, M. V. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108773 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“These distinctions are even apparent for cortical sub-regions, which display profound heterogeneity in anatomical and functional connectivity to striatum, as well as divergent synaptic phenotypes in response to loss of the postsynaptic scaffolding molecule SAPAP3 (Corbit et al., 2019).”
Glorie, D., Verhaeghe, J. A. J., Miranda, A., Lombaerde, S. D., Stroobants, S. G., & Staelens, S. G. (2020) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-020-00721-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liu, J., Liu, D., Pu, X., Zou, K., Xie, T., Li, Y., & Yao, H. (2023) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-023-01073-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Park, H., Kim, M., Kwak, Y. B., Cho, K. I. K., Lee, J., Moon, S., Lho, S. K., & Kwon, J. S. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01588-6 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“By assessing functional synaptic inputs in the central striatum, a knockout mouse study also revealed weakened inputs from the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and strengthened inputs from the secondary motor area in mice with OCD-like behaviors, thus suggesting a model of imbalanced cortical inputs to the striatum [67].”
BackgroundMalgady, J. M., Baez, A., Hobel, Z. B., Jimenez, K., Goldfried, J., Prager, E. M., Wilking, J. A., Zhang, Q., Feng, G., & Plotkin, J. L. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113384 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Unlike the central “associative” striatum, where deletion of SAPAP3 has no effect on SPN somatic excitability, 28 deletion of SAPAP3 significantly enhanced SPN excitability in the dorsolateral striatum (Figure 1).”
Corticostriatal Circuit Models of Cognitive Impairments Induced by Fetal Exposure to Alcohol
Bariselli, S., & Lovinger, D. M. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.014 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“While hypoactivation of OFC characterizes deficits in 278 reversal learning in animal models of OCD (108), recent data suggest that synaptic 279 strengthening and weakening of secondary motor cortex and OFC striatal inputs, respectively, 280 contribute to compulsive behavior in an OCD model (109).”
Zhou, C., Cai, M., Wang, Y., Wu, W.-J., Yin, Y., Wang, X., Hu, G., Wang, H., Tan, Q., & Peng, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.706786 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Neurobiology of Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder from Genes to Circuits: Insights from Animal Models
Zhang, Y.-D., Shi, D., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-024-01252-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Furthermore, striatal MSNs showed an increased response to the in vitro optogenetic activation of secondary motor area (M2) terminals in the striatum of the Sapap3 KO mice, supporting a potential role for M2-striatal circuit may contribute to compulsive behaviors [65].”
Altered corticostriatal synchronization associated with compulsive-like behavior in APP/PS1 mice
Peng, Y., Cai, P.-J., Hu, J.-H., Jiang, J., Zhang, J., Liu, K.-F., Yang, L., & Long, C. (2021) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113805 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ehmer, I., Crown, L., van Leeuwen, W., Feenstra, M., Willuhn, I., & Denys, D. (2020) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0245-19.2020 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“For example, striatal input from the secondary motor cortex, which is strengthened in SAPAP3 (Corbit et al., 2019), has not yet been tested in SA.”
BackgroundDifferential encoding of action selection by orbitofrontal and striatal population dynamics
Yang, L., & Masmanidis, S. C. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00316.2020 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Schreiner, D. C., Cazares, C., Renteria, R., & Gremel, C. M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29807-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Dormán, D. B., & Blackwell, K. T. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12101402 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“The anterior lateral motor cortex was selected because those pyramidal neurons project to the striatum, and the spike trains were collected during a learning task known to involve the striatum [41,42].”
BackgroundMorris, C. W., Watkins, D. S., Shah, N. R., Pennington, T., Hens, B., Qi, G. D., Doud, E. H., Mosley, A. L., Atwood, B. K., & Baucum, A. J. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.12.008 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Glorie, D., Verhaeghe, J. A. J., Miranda, A., Kertész, I., Wyffels, L., Stroobants, S. G., & Staelens, S. G. (2020) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108160 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Deep Brain Stimulation in Pediatric Populations: A Scoping Review of the Clinical Trial Landscape
Jung, Y., Mithani, K., Suresh, H., Warsi, N. M., Harmsen, I. E., Breitbart, S. C., Gorodetsky, C., Fasano, A. A., Fallah, A., Hadjinicolaou, A., et al. (2025) · Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery · doi:10.1159/000543289 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Rodent models of repetitive, stereotyped, and compulsive behavior demonstrate hyperactivity in the striatal interneurons and their cortical projections [55, 56].”
Reduced Axon Calibre in the Associative Striatum of the Sapap3 Knockout Mouse
Lousada, E. L. R. D. S., Boudreau, M., Cohen‐Adad, J., Nait‐Oumesmar, B., Burguière, E., & Schreiweis, C. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11101353 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Given that axonal calibre is positively related to synaptic strength [38,39], the here‐observed structural phenotype of a decrease of axon calibre in the associative striatum is in line with and corroborates a previously reported decrease in cortico‐striatal synaptic strength in the associative striatum [30,64].”
BackgroundResultCorbit, V. L., Piantadosi, S. C., Wood, J. T., Liu, G., Choi, C. J. Y., Witten, I. B., Gittis, A. H., & Ahmari, S. E. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.01.08.899070 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationThe genetics of trichotillomania and excoriation disorder: A systematic review
Reid, M., Lin, A., Farhat, L. C., Fernandez, T. V., & Olfson, E. (2024) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152506 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…to findings implicating the striatum [67–82], the glutamatergic system [83–87], the monoaminergic system [88], the orbitofrontal cortex [89–91], the motor cortex [73], the medial prefrontal cortex [92], and dopamine receptors [93] to obsessive-compulsive symptoms and aberrant grooming behaviors.”
BackgroundLaurent, R. S., Kusche, K. M., Rein, B. A., Raymond, K. B., Kreitzer, A. C., & Malenka, R. C. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.021 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Optogenetically-inspired neuromodulation: Translating basic discoveries into therapeutic strategies
Murphy, C. A., Matikainen‐Ankney, B. A., Chang, Y.-H., Copits, B. A., & Creed, M. C. (2021) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2021.06.002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Campos-Ordoñez, T., Alcalá, E., Ibarra-Castañeda, N., Buriticá, J., & González-Pérez, Ó. (2021) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113664 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Manning, E. E., Wang, A. Y., Saikali, L. M., Winner, A. S., & Ahmari, S. E. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/694935 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationOscillation/Coincidence-Detection Models of Reward-Related Timing in Corticostriatal Circuits
Yin, B., Shi, Z., Wang, Y., & Meck, W. H. (2022) · Timing & Time Perception · doi:10.1163/22134468-bja10057 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Chronic alcohol exposure alters action control via hyperactive premotor corticostriatal activity
Schreiner, D. C., Wright, A., Baltz, E. T., Wang, T., Cazares, C., & Gremel, C. M. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112675 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“32, 46 While there been reports of alterations to premotor circuits in In the present findings, impaired sensitivity to recent action information was causally tied to M2-DMS activity, replicating prior findings.”
Acrobatic exercise recovers object recognition memory impairment in hypoxic‐ischemic rats
de Almeida, W., Confortim, H. D., Deniz, B. F., Miguel, P. M., Vieira, M. C., Bronauth, L., dos Santos, A. S., Bertoldi, K., Siqueira, I. R., & Pereira, L. O. (2020) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1002/jdn.10075 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Late development of OCD-like phenotypes in Dlgap1 knockout mice
Minagawa, K., Hayakawa, T., Akimoto, H., Nagashima, T., Takahashi, Y., & Asai, S. (2024) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-024-06668-9 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Deletion in Dlgap3 has been shown to result in altered synaptic strength and circuit dynamics in the striatum (Burguière et al. 2013; Corbit et al. 2019 ; Hadjas et al. 2020; Ramírez-Armenta et al. 2022; Welch et al. 2007 ), especially imbalance between the dynamics of striatal subcircuits due to…”
Rewiring the OCD brain: Insights beyond cortico-striatal networks
Jijimon, F., Mehak, S. F., Mohammed, Z., Praharaj, S. K., & Gangadharan, G. (2025) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2025.107216 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Forebrain EAAT3 Overexpression Increases Susceptibility to Amphetamine-Induced Repetitive Behaviors
Kopelman, J. M., Chohan, M. O., Hsu, A. I., Yttri, E. A., Veenstra-VanderWeele, J. M., & Ahmari, S. E. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0090-24.2024 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of fear and dopamine-striatal pathways in grooming
Givon, L., Edut, S., & Klavir, O. (2025) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110323 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…human studies (Breiter and Rauch, 1996; Fettes et al., 2017; Menzies et al., 2008; Olver et al., 2009) and in animal studies (Ahmari et al., 2013; Corbit et al., 2019; Mondrag ´ on-Gonz ´ alez et al., 2024) striatal abnormalities were tied to OCD, with particular focus on striatal DA…”
Gómez‐Pineda, V. G., Huang, D., Chen, Y., Guo, C., & Ma, Y. (2026) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-026-02385-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Local interneurons inhibit MSNs (5) and suppress glutamate release from M2 (6) and non-M2 (7) terminals.”
Corbit, V. L., Piantadosi, S. C., Wood, J. T., Madireddy, S. S., Choi, C. J. Y., Witten, I. B., Gittis, A. H., & Ahmari, S. E. (2025) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115181 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In addition, in previous ex vivo slice electrophysiology work in WTs and Sapap3-KOs, 17 we showed that ALM projects monosynaptically to CS, contacting both SPNs and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs).”
InfluentialSelf-citationArdinger, C. E., Morningstar, M. D., Lapish, C. C., & Linsenbardt, D. N. (2025) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110522 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Reduced axon caliber in the associative striatum of the Sapap3 knockout mousePreprint
Lousada, E. L. R. D. S., Boudreau, M., Cohen‐Adad, J., Nait‐Oumesmar, B., Burguière, E., & Schreiweis, C. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.12.426339 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Márquez-Gómez, R., Parke, B., Cras, Y., Gullino, L. S., Hashemi, P., & Ellender, T. J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.19.563087 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…striatum and its cortical inputs ( Nordstrom & Burton, 2002 ; McCairn et al., 2009 ; Worbe et al., 2012 ; Ahmari et al., 2013 ; Worbe et al., 2015 ; Corbit et al., 2019 ) altering their interactions with other brain regions and associated structures ( O'Connell & Hofmann, 2012 ; Albin, 2018 ) and…”
BackgroundMarroni, S. S., Santos, V. R., Castro, O. W., Tejada, J., Santos, J., de Oliveira, J. A. C., & Garcia-Cairasco, N. (2025) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110273 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, K., Germann, J., Matin, R., Mithani, K., Ellegood, J., Suresh, H., Wong, S., Lerch, J. P., Nieman, B. J., Taylor, M. J., et al. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb5842 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Malgady, J. M., Baez, A., Jimenez, K., Hobel, Z. B., Prager, E. M., Zhang, Q., Feng, G., & Plotkin, J. L. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479446 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Unlike the central “associative” striatum of SAPAP3 KO mice (which also displays corticostriatal synaptic impairments) (Corbit et al., 2019), we found that somatic excitability is elevated in both direct and indirect pathway SPNs in the dorsolateral striatum.”
BackgroundInfluentialLaurent, R. S., Kusche, K. M., Kreitzer, A. C., & Malenka, R. C. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.12.578709 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Asaoka, N., Pagano, D., & Hayashi, Y. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75706-1
The Sapap3-knockout mouse model manifests a spectrum of repetitive behavioursPreprint
Lamothe, H., Schreiweis, C., Mallet, L., & Burguière, E. (2021) · HAL · doi:10.1101/2020.01.22.915215
Ketamine increases activity of a fronto-striatal projection that regulates compulsive behaviorPreprint
Davis, G. L., Minerva, A. R., Lario, A., Rodríguez, C. I., & Gunaydin, L. A. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.06.190553
Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome
Mantovani, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43356-7_10
Corticostriatal deficits underlying cognitive impairments induced by fetal exposure to alcoholPreprint
Bariselli, S., & Lovinger, D. M. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6t2y3
Nautilus: los secretos de una antigua criatura
de Lozoya, A. V. (2001) · Quercus eBooks
Mondragón-González, S. L., Schreiweis, C., & Burguière, E. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.10.475745
Wang, Y., Yu, J., Ma, R., Chen, Y., Lu, S., & Fang, J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-14076-y
Glorie, D., Verhaeghe, J., Miranda, A., Lombaerde, S. D., Stroobants, S. G., & Staelens, S. G. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13237747
M�rquez-G�mez, R., Cras, Y., Parke, B., Backer, T. D., Gullino, L. S., Hashemi, P., & Ellender, T. J. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1230-25.2026
Animal models of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Moya, P. R., Ardiles, N. M., Henríquez-Belmar, F., Plaza-Briceño, W., & Acevedo-Hernández, P. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-27446-6.00008-x
- Authors
- Corbit, V. L., Manning, E. E., Gittis, A. H., & Ahmari, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2019-02-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2965-2975
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6462450
- OpenAlex
- W2912901595
- Semantic Scholar
- 72ebabf77342aca9ceaf1360b9a1f1ca7ec170cc
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1516288)
- McKnight Foundation
- MQ: Transforming Mental Health (MQ13001)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH104255, F31MH110125)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R00NS076524, R01NS101016, R01NS104835, R35NS132213)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- compulsive behavior, obsessive-compulsive disorder, corticostriatal projections, secondary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, medium spiny neurons, fast-spiking interneurons, intrinsic excitability, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, Tourette syndrome, deep brain stimulation targets, motor sequencing, synaptic plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Interneurons, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Cortex, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Synapses, Neostriatum, Mice, Knockout, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice, Optogenetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review