Cited by 80Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Strengthened Inputs from Secondary Motor Cortex to Striatum in a Mouse Model of Compulsive Behavior

Open access
Corbit, Victoria L., Manning, Elizabeth E., Gittis, Aryn H., Ahmari, Susanne E.·2019·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Hyperactivity in striatum is associated with compulsive behaviors in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related illnesses, but it is unclear whether this hyperactivity is due to intrinsic striatal dysfunction or abnormalities in corticostriatal inputs. Understanding the cellular and circuit properties underlying striatal hyperactivity could help inform the optimization of targeted stimulation treatments for compulsive behavior disorders. To investigate the cellular and synaptic abnormalities that may underlie corticostriatal dysfunction relevant to OCD, we used the Sapap3 knock-out (Sapap3-KO) mouse model of compulsive behaviors, which also exhibits hyperactivity in central striatum.Ex vivo electrophysiology in double-transgenic mice was used to assess intrinsic excitability and functional synaptic input in spiny projection neurons (SPNs) and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs) in central striatum of Sapap3-KOs and wild-type (WT) littermates. While we found no differences in intrinsic excitability of SPNs or FSIs between Sapap3-KOs and WTs, excitatory drive to FSIs was significantly increased in KOs. Contrary to predictions, lateral orbitofrontal cortex-striatal synapses were not responsible for this increased drive; optogenetic stimulation revealed that lateral orbitofrontal cortex input to SPNs was reduced in KOs (∼3-fold) and unchanged in FSIs. However, secondary motor area (M2) postsynaptic responses in central striatum were significantly increased (∼6-fold) in strength and reliability in KOs relative to WTs. These results suggest that increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to both in vivo striatal hyperactivity and compulsive behaviors, and support a potential role for presupplementary/supplementary motor cortical regions in the pathology and treatment of compulsive behavior disorders. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT These findings highlight an unexpected contribution of M2 projections to striatal dysfunction in the Sapap3-KO obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)-relevant mouse model, with M2 inputs strengthened by at least sixfold onto both spiny projection neurons and fast-spiking interneurons in central striatum. Because M2 is thought to be homologous to presupplementary/supplementary motor areas (pre-SMA/SMA) in humans, regions important for movement preparation and behavioral sequencing, these data are consistent with a model in which increased drive from M2 leads to excessive selection of sequenced motor patterns. Together with observations of hyperactivity in pre-SMA/SMA in both OCD and Tourette syndrome, and evidence that pre-SMA is a potential target for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in OCD, these results support further dissection of the role of M2 in compulsivity.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In Sapap3-KO mice, a model of compulsive grooming, intrinsic excitability of central striatal SPNs and FSIs was normal, but cortical input to central striatum was imbalanced. LOFC input to SPNs was reduced, while M2 input to both SPNs and FSIs was substantially strengthened, suggesting increased M2-striatal drive may contribute to striatal hyperactivity and compulsive behavior.

Key findings

  • No genotype differences were found in intrinsic excitability of SPNs or FSIs, or in FSI number in central striatum (FSI count p = 0.21, WRST).
  • Excitatory drive to FSIs was increased in Sapap3-KOs with intrastriatal electrical stimulation: at 20 µA, WT EPSC amplitude was 422 pA (SEM 59 pA) vs KO 857 pA (SEM 128 pA; p < 0.01, WRST).
  • LOFC input to central striatal SPNs was reduced ~3.2-fold in KOs (WT 444.84 pA, IQR 637.43 pA; KO 137.92 pA, IQR 110.20 pA; p = 6.14 × 10⁻⁴, WRST), with no significant change in FSIs.
  • M2 input to central striatum was increased in KOs: SPN EPSCs were ~6-fold larger (WT 42.58 pA, IQR 136.36 pA; KO 254.28 pA, IQR 221.90 pA; p = 1.11 × 10⁻⁴) and FSI EPSCs ~6.6-fold larger (WT 85.81 pA, IQR 158.33 pA; KO 564.65 pA, IQR 640.84 pA; p = 2.44 × 10⁻⁵); SPN response reliability increased from 65.41% (SEM 7.17%) in WTs to 100% in KOs (p = 0.0034).
  • Strengthened M2 synapses involved postsynaptic changes: SPN aEPSC amplitudes were greater in KOs (WT 13.25 pA, IQR 2.27 pA; KO 20.48 pA, IQR 8.59 pA; p < 0.05), and NMDA-mediated currents were increased in both SPNs (WT 95.99 pA, IQR 111.69 pA; KO 174.77 pA, IQR 268.43 pA; p < 0.05) and FSIs (WT 27.56 pA, IQR 75.81 pA; KO 108.61 pA, IQR 79.91 pA; p < 0.05).

Methods

  • Ex vivo acute slice electrophysiology in Sapap3-KO//PV-Cre and WT littermates, with recordings from central striatal SPNs and PV-positive FSIs; intrinsic excitability and synaptic responses were measured blind to genotype.
  • Optogenetic stimulation of ChR2-expressing LOFC or M2 terminals in central striatum, plus intrastriatal electrical stimulation, to assess region-specific excitatory input.
  • Retrograde Fluoro-Gold tracing from central striatum, PV immunohistochemistry for FSI counts, and separate grooming assessments; statistical comparisons used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and ANOVA, with medians ± IQR unless noted.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the ex vivo data do not directly explain baseline SPN hyperactivity in vivo and that future in vivo studies of M2 and central striatal SPN activity are needed.
  • The paper states that FSI-SPN synapses were not measured, so changes there could affect interpretation.
  • The paper cautions that findings should be translated to human OCD with caution and should not be used as the basis for treatment recommendations; evident from the text, some optogenetic and aEPSC groups had small animal numbers (e.g., LOFC KO SPNs: 3 animals, 15 cells; M2 KO SPNs: 7 animals, 22 cells; aEPSC: 2 WT mice, 9 cells and 3 KO mice, 12 cells).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1728-18.2018

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    SPN mean response reliability was significantly increased in KOs relative to WTs.

    “SPN mean response reliability was significantly increased in KOs relative to WTs”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “we did observe a substantial increase in M2 reliability”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
  • Findingown data

    There are no genotype differences in PPR at M2 synapses in either FSIs or SPNs.

    “No genotype differences in PPR were observed in either FSIs or SPNs (Table 2), suggesting a postsynaptic alteration in glutamate receptor number or composition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There are no differences in intrinsic excitability of FSIs between Sapap3-KOs and WTs.

    “However, there were no detectable genotype differences in intrinsic excitability of FSIs as assessed by firing rate I-O curves (Fig. 1D), I-O curve linear slope, or any other intrinsic properties (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    SPNs in KO mice showed significantly greater aEPSCs relative to WT mice.

    “SPNs in KO mice showed significantly greater aEPSCs relative to WT mice”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There was not a significant correlation between average fluorescence intensity of ChR2-infected M2 projections and overall average amplitude of EPSCs recorded in FSIs and SPNs in a given animal.

    “There was not a significant correlation (r ϭ Ϫ0.17, p ϭ 0.45, Pearson's R).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The paper found no abnormalities in intrinsic striatal properties in KOs but found substantial alteration in cortical inputs to central striatum.

    “We found no abnormalities in intrinsic striatal properties in KOs but found substantial alteration in cortical inputs to central striatum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    FSI mean response reliability was greater in KOs but not significantly.

    “FSI mean response reliability was greater in KOs, but not significantly”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There are no differences in paired-pulse ratio or EPSC decay kinetics in either SPNs or FSIs between genotypes.

    “No differences in paired-pulse ratio (PPR) or EPSC decay kinetics were observed in either cell type (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Ipsilateral M2 showed the highest proportion of labeled cells, significantly greater than the proportions in LOFC, MOFC, PL, and DLOFC.

    “Ipsilateral M2 showed the highest proportion of labeled cells (WT: 44.3 Ϯ 3.9%; KO: 38.9 Ϯ 4.8%), which was significantly greater than the proportions in LOFC ( p Ͻ 0.05), MOFC ( p Ͻ 0.001), PL ( p Ͻ 0.001), and DLOFC ( p Ͻ 0.001, post hoc contrasts).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sapap3-KO mice exhibit hyperactivity in central striatum at baseline and during compulsive grooming.

    “Furthermore, consistent with human OCD literature, they also exhibit hyperactivity in central striatum at baseline and during compulsive grooming (Burguie `re et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burguie `re et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All data were analyzed with genotype blind to the experimenter.

    “All data were analyzed with genotype blind to the experimenter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pre-SMA/SMA cortical regions may play a role in the pathology and treatment of compulsive behavior disorders.

    “and support a potential role for presupplementary/supplementary motor cortical regions in the pathology and treatment of compulsive behavior disorders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The experimenter was blind to genotype during slice recording.

    “Brains were sliced for recording with experimenter blind to genotype.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Approximately equal numbers of male and female mice were used.

    “Approximately equal numbers of male and female mice were used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Only animals with confirmed injection sites in central striatum were used for analysis.

    “Only animals with confirmed injection sites in central striatum were used for analysis (Fig. 3B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection.

    “M2 in mice is involved in behavioral planning and movement preparation during behavioral selection”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gremel and Costa, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Guo et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cao et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Acute slice electrophysiology experiments were designed to include approximately equal numbers of Sapap3-KOs and WTs.

    “Acute slice electrophysiology experiments were designed to include approximately equal numbers of Sapap3-KOs and WTs, taking into account animal availability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Images were manually thresholded so that signal:background ratios were similar across animals.

    “To normalize differences in Fluoro-Gold brightness and background in different animals, images were then manually thresholded so that the signal:background ratios were similar across animals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Sections containing central striatum were examined to ensure appropriate targeting and spread of Fluoro-Gold before proceeding with cell counting.

    “Sections containing central striatum (0.85-0.25 mm anteroposterior) were examined to ensure appropriate targeting and spread of Fluoro-Gold before proceeding with cell counting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Abnormally strengthened M2 input to central striatum leads to more initiations and fewer completions of grooming behavior sequences in Sapap3-KOs.

    “This evidence supports the hypothesis that abnormally strengthened M2 input to central striatum leads to more initiations and fewer completions of grooming behavior sequences in Sapap3-KOs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
    • Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Habit expression is dependent on endocannabinoid-mediated LTD.

    “habit expression is dependent on endocannabinoid-mediated LTD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gremel et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Activity in LOFC corticostriatal projections is essential for updating action-value associations.

    “activity in LOFC corticostriatal projections is essential for updating action-value associations”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gremel et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This heightened functional connectivity and increased response reliability could result in striatal neurons that are primed to respond to M2 activity, which in turn could increase the likelihood of initiating specific sequenced behaviors.

    “This heightened functional connectivity and increased response reliability could result in striatal neurons that are primed to respond to M2 activity, which in turn could increase the likelihood of initiating specific sequenced behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Reduced activity in LOFC corticostriatal terminals is necessary for habit expression.

    “reduced activity in LOFC corticostriatal terminals is necessary for habit expression”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gremel et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mouse central striatum corresponds to the human caudate head.

    “We propose that mouse central striatum corresponds to the human caudate head”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The observed downregulation of LOFC corticostriatal inputs could further bias Sapap3-KOs toward decreased flexible action selection and increased compulsivity and/or habit formation.

    “These findings suggest that our observed downregulation of LOFC corticostriatal inputs could further bias Sapap3-KOs toward decreased flexible action selection and increased compulsivity and/or habit formation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pathologically enhanced plasticity mechanisms may be present at M2 corticostriatal synapses, which could contribute to abnormal learning phenotypes and persistence of compulsive grooming behavior observed in Sapap3-KOs.

    “This suggests that pathologically enhanced plasticity mechanisms may be present at M2 corticostriatal synapses, which could contribute to abnormal learning phenotypes (Burguie `re et al., 2013) and persistence of compulsive grooming behavior (Welch et al., 2007) observed in Sapap3-KOs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Burguière et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Welch et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Strengthened M2 drive and/or reduced LOFC input to central striatum could play a role in generating compulsive grooming behavior in Sapap3-KO mice.

    “strengthened M2 drive and/or reduced LOFC input to central striatum could play a role in generating compulsive grooming behavior in Sapap3-KO mice”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    M2-striatal projections are critical for initiation of behavioral sequences.

    “M2-striatal projections have been shown to be critical for initiation of behavioral sequences (Rothwell et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rothwell et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    FSIs can tune SPN firing to task-relevant events.

    “FSIs can tune SPN firing to task-relevant events (Lee et al., 2017;O'Hare et al., 2017;Owen et al., 2018)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites O'Hare et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Owen et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The ideal treatment intervention would involve closed-loop technology that could tune neural activity up or down depending on specific context, task requirements, and individuals' symptom levels.

    “the ideal treatment intervention would involve closed-loop technology that could tune neural activity up or down depending on specific context, task requirements, and individuals' symptom levels”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased FSI drive could contribute to enhanced neural activity specifically during performance of sequenced motor behaviors, such as grooming in Sapap3-KOs.

    “Increased FSI drive could therefore contribute to enhanced neural activity specifically during performance of sequenced motor behaviors, such as grooming in Sapap3-KOs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    FSI firing can potentiate activity in a subset of SPNs.

    “other reports show that FSI firing can potentiate activity in a subset of SPNs (O'Hare et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O'Hare et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    FSIs are canonically thought to strongly inhibit SPN firing.

    “FSIs are canonically thought to strongly inhibit SPN firing (Owen et al., 2018)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Owen et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Decreasing pre-SMA activity through low-frequency rTMS could be therapeutic.

    “decreasing pre-SMA activity through low-frequency rTMS could be therapeutic”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased drive to FSIs could also play a role in SPN hyperactivity.

    “Increased drive to FSIs could also play a role in SPN hyperactivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The paper did not measure FSI-SPN synapses in this study.

    “we did not measure FSI-SPN synapses in our study”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Changes in FSI-SPN synaptic strength in KOs could affect interpretation of our findings.

    “changes in FSI-SPN synaptic strength in KOs could affect interpretation of our findings”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pre-SMA hyperactivity in OCD patients is compensatory, with higher pre-SMA activity correlating with lower Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores.

    “pre-SMA hyperactivity in OCD patients is compensatory, with higher pre-SMA activity correlating with lower Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores (van Velzen et al., 2014)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van Velzen et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If M2-central striatum circuits are specifically engaged during sequenced behaviors, such as grooming, this could lead to behavior-specific generation of larger evoked postsynaptic responses, resulting in striatal hyperactivity.

    “If M2-central striatum circuits are specifically engaged during sequenced behaviors, such as grooming, this could lead to behavior-specific generation of larger evoked postsynaptic responses, resulting in striatal hyperactivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased reliability may cause increased drive of SPNs that we cannot capture with ex vivo physiology, especially if M2 itself is hyperactive or hypersynchronous in vivo.

    “This increased reliability may cause increased drive of SPNs that we cannot capture with ex vivo physiology, especially if M2 itself is hyperactive or hypersynchronous in vivo.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The paper's data highlight M2-striatal pathology in an OCD-relevant mouse model and support a novel conceptual model in which Sapap3-KO mice display a shift toward increased motor control and decreased associative control over central striatum.

    “Our data highlight M2-striatal pathology in an OCDrelevant mouse model and support a novel conceptual model in which Sapap3-KO mice display a shift toward increased motor control and decreased associative control over central striatum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    The appropriate therapeutic intervention would be to use high-frequency rTMS to enhance compensation in OCD subjects whose pre-SMA activity is in the lower range.

    “the appropriate therapeutic intervention would be to use high-frequency rTMS to enhance compensation in OCD subjects whose pre-SMA activity is in the lower range”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Functional imaging studies have identified hyperactivity in pre-SMA in OCD subjects relative to healthy controls.

    “functional imaging studies that have identified hyperactivity in pre-SMA in OCD subjects relative to healthy controls”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Yücel et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites de Wit et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grützmann et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SPN hyperactivity has been described during compulsive grooming as well as at baseline.

    “SPN hyperactivity has been described during compulsive grooming as well as at baseline (Burguie `re et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burguière et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pre-SMA is a more important treatment target for decreasing compulsive behaviors in OCD and related disorders than previously suspected.

    “pre-SMA is a more important treatment target for decreasing compulsive behaviors in OCD and related disorders than previously suspected”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings support the potential clinical importance of further investigations of pre-SMA/SMA function in OCD patients.

    “these findings support the potential clinical importance of further investigations of pre-SMA/SMA function in OCD patients”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
42 of 42
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is unclear whether striatal hyperactivity in OCD is due to intrinsic striatal dysfunction or abnormalities in corticostriatal inputs.

    “it is unclear whether this hyperactivity is due to intrinsic striatal dysfunction or abnormalities in corticostriatal inputs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cellular and synaptic abnormalities that underlie striatal hyperactivity in OCD are unclear.

    “However, the cellular and synaptic abnormalities that underlie this hyperactivity are unclear.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The contribution of corticostriatal inputs from M2 to striatal hyperactivity in Sapap3-KOs has been unexplored.

    “However, the contribution of corticostriatal inputs from M2 to striatal hyperactivity in Sapap3-KOs has been unexplored, despite the fact that M2 is the mouse homolog of pre-SMA, a promising treatment target.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Sapap3-KO mouse model exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior.

    “a transgenic mouse model that exhibits OCD-relevant compulsive behavior, Sapap3-KOs”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ex vivo synaptic measurements reflect in vivo circuit function.

    “our ex vivo data do not directly explain baseline SPN hyperactivity in vivo”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ChR2-evoked EPSCs specifically reflect M2 input.

    “AAV2-hSyn-ChR2-EYFP was injected into M2 to selectively label M2 projections in central striatum.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LOFC neurons send inputs to a subregion of striatum ranging from dorsomedial to central striatum, with dense inputs in the central subregion.

    “Consistently, it has repeatedly been reported that LOFC neurons send inputs to a subregion of the striatum ranging from the dorsomedial to the central striatum. Dense inputs are observed in the central subregion60–63.”

    From Dissociable roles of prefrontal plasticity in decision-making strategy and execution of habitual behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [62]

    The section “M2 and LOFC are the main sources of cortical input to central striatum” (page not available) reports LOFC neurons projecting to central striatum. The Discussion also describes prominent functional LOFC input there in wild-type mice. Our copy does not establish a projection range from dorsomedial to central striatum or show that inputs are densest in the central subregion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • NMDARs could also be altered in the Sapap3-KO model, as previous work suggested.

    “However, NMDARs could also be altered in the Sapap3-KO model, as previous work suggested [9,22].”
  • A recent study showed in 8-9 weeks old Sapap3-KO mice that the OFC projection to the DS is weakened.

    “This result is in contrast with a recent study that showed in 8-9 weeks old Sapap3-KO mice that the OFC projection to the DS is weakened [22].”
  • A similar finding in the Sapap3-KO model has been reported for the anterior secondary motor cortex (aM2) where AMPAR and NMDAR currents were increased with a net decreased A/N ratio.

    “The observation is nevertheless worth noting, since a similar finding in the Sapap3-KO model has been reported for the anterior secondary motor cortex (aM2) where AMPAR and NMDAR currents were increased with a net decreased A/N ratio [22].”
  • For the projection from the anterior aM2 to the DS, increased AMPAR responses have been shown.

    “For the projection from the anterior aM2 to the DS increased AMPAR responses have been shown [22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • LOFC-to-FSI sample sizes are reversed between the figure and table

    Minor

    Figure 4 assigns 5 animals and 10 cells to WT and 10 animals and 21 cells to KO. Table 2 assigns those same genotype-specific counts in the opposite direction for LOFC stimulation PPR.

  • Optogenetic pulse duration differs between Methods and figure legends

    Minor

    The Methods specify 1 ms light pulses, but the legends for Figures 4 and 5 specify 10 ms pulses for the optogenetic stimulation.

  • Conflicting p-values for M2-to-FSI response reliability

    Minor

    The Results report p = 0.35 for the FSI reliability comparison, whereas the Figure 5 legend reports p = 0.22 for that comparison.

  • LOFC-to-SPN KO animal count differs between figure and table

    Minor

    Figure 4 reports 3 KO animals and 15 cells for LOFC-evoked SPN EPSCs. Table 2 reports 5 KO animals and 15 cells for the LOFC-stimulation SPN PPR measurements, leaving the number of animals contributing those 15 cells inconsistent.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corbit, V. L., Manning, E. E., Gittis, A. H., & Ahmari, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2019-02-08
Volume
39
Issue
15
Pages
2965-2975
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2912901595
Cited by
80
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5
FWCI
14.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1516288)
  • McKnight Foundation
  • MQ: Transforming Mental Health (MQ13001)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH104255, F31MH110125)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R00NS076524, R01NS101016, R01NS104835, R35NS132213)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
compulsive behavior, obsessive-compulsive disorder, corticostriatal projections, secondary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, medium spiny neurons, fast-spiking interneurons, intrinsic excitability, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, Tourette syndrome, deep brain stimulation targets, motor sequencing, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Interneurons, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Cortex, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Synapses, Neostriatum, Mice, Knockout, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review