Cited by 715Neural dynamics and brain functionMotor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Flow of cortical activity underlying a tactile decision in mice

Open access
Guo, Zengcai V., Li, Nuo, Huber, Daniel, Ophir, Eran, Gutnisky, Diego, Ting, Jonathan T., Feng, Guoping, Svoboda, Karel·2014·Neuron

Abstract

Perceptual decisions involve distributed cortical activity. Does information flow sequentially from one cortical area to another, or do networks of interconnected areas contribute at the same time? Here we delineate when and how activity in specific areas drives a whisker-based decision in mice. A short-term memory component temporally separated tactile "sensation" and "action" (licking). Using optogenetic inhibition (spatial resolution, 2 mm; temporal resolution, 100 ms), we surveyed the neocortex for regions driving behavior during specific behavioral epochs. Barrel cortex was critical for sensation. During the short-term memory, unilateral inhibition of anterior lateral motor cortex biased responses to the ipsilateral side. Consistently, barrel cortex showed stimulus-specific activity during sensation, whereas motor cortex showed choice-specific preparatory activity and movement-related activity, consistent with roles in motor planning and movement. These results suggest serial information flow from sensory to motor areas during perceptual decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.020

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peak 4 is likely to reflect participation of the primary somatosensory cortex in motor preparatory activity, often observed in higher motor cortices.

    “Hence, peak 4 is likely to reflect participation of the primary somatosensory cortex in motor preparatory activity, often observed in higher motor cortices (12–14).”

    From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    In “Neuronal selectivity in vS1 and ALM” (page unavailable), the paper reports motor-preparatory activity in ALM, a motor cortical area. It instead describes vS1 activity as representing tactile information independent of motor choice. The paper therefore supports the comparison with motor cortex, but not the proposed interpretation of peak 4 as motor preparation in primary somatosensory cortex. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Serial transformation of sensory inputs along bottom-up hierarchical pathways has been observed in rodents engaged in whisker-discrimination tasks, with increasingly stronger association with perceptual choice in S2 and premotor areas rather than wS1.

    “Serial transformation of sensory inputs along bottom–up hierarchical pathways has been observed in rodents engaged in whisker-discrimination tasks (8, 9) with an increasingly stronger association with perceptual choice in S2 (10, 11) and premotor areas (12–14) rather than whisker-related wS1 (9).”

    From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This global regulation is unlikely to originate directly from frontal cortical premotor areas since frontal cortices have a high degree of symmetry for both ipsilateral and contralateral projections.

    “Therefore, this global regulation is unlikely to originate directly from frontal cortical premotor areas (12–14) since frontal cortices have a high degree of symmetry for both ipsilateral and contralateral projections (59).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Afraz SR, Kiani R, Esteky H. Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization. Nature. 2006; 442:692-695. [PubMed: 16878143]
  2. Aravanis AM, Wang LP, Zhang F, Meltzer LA, Mogri MZ, Schneider MB, Deisseroth K. An optical neural interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiberoptic and optogenetic technology. J Neural Eng. 2007; 4:S143-156. [PubMed: 17873414]
  3. Armstrong-James M, Fox K, Das-Gupta A. Flow of excitation within rat barrel cortex on striking a single vibrissa. J Neurosci. 1992; 68:1345-1354.
  4. Bisley JW, Zaksas D, Pasternak T. Microstimulation of cortical area MT affects performance on a visual working memory task. Journal of neurophysiology. 2001; 85:187-196. [PubMed: 11152719]
  5. Brecht M. Movement, confusion, and orienting in frontal cortices. Neuron. 2011; 72:193-196. [PubMed: 22017982]
  6. Brecht M, Sakmann B. Dynamic representation of whisker deflection by synaptic potentials in spiny stellate and pyramidal cells in the barrels and septa of layer 4 rat somatosensory cortex. J Physiol. 2002; 543:49-70. [PubMed: 12181281]
  7. Clack NG, O'Connor DH, Huber D, Petreanu L, Hires A, Peron S, Svoboda K, Myers EW. Automated tracking of whiskers in videos of head fixed rodents. PLoS computational biology. 2012; 8:e1002591. [PubMed: 22792058]
  8. Curtis JC, Kleinfeld D. Phase-to-rate transformations encode touch in cortical neurons of a scanning sensorimotor system. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12:492-501. [PubMed: 19270688]
  9. de Lafuente V, Romo R. Neuronal correlates of subjective sensory experience. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8:1698-1703. [PubMed: 16286929]
  10. Ding L, Gold JI. Caudate encodes multiple computations for perceptual decisions. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2010; 30:15747-15759. [PubMed: 21106814]
  11. Erlich JC, Bialek M, Brody CD. A cortical substrate for memory-guided orienting in the rat. Neuron. 2011; 72:330-343. [PubMed: 22017991]
  12. Ferezou I, Haiss F, Gentet LJ, Aronoff R, Weber B, Petersen CC. Spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical sensorimotor integration in behaving mice. Neuron. 2007; 56:907-923. [PubMed: 18054865]
  13. Fuster JM, Alexander GE. Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science. 1971; 173:652-654. [PubMed: 4998337]
  14. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron. 2002; 36:299-308. [PubMed: 12383783]
  15. Goldman-Rakic PS. Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron. 1995; 14:477-485. [PubMed: 7695894]
  16. Green, DM.; Swets, JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1966.
  17. Harvey CD, Coen P, Tank DW. Choice-specific sequences in parietal cortex during a virtual- navigation decision task. Nature. 2012; 484:62-68. [PubMed: 22419153]
  18. Harvey MA, Sachdev RN, Zeigler HP. Cortical barrel field ablation and unconditioned whisking kinematics. Somatosens Mot Res. 2001; 18:223-227. [PubMed: 11562085]
  19. Hernandez A, Nacher V, Luna R, Zainos A, Lemus L, Alvarez M, Vazquez Y, Camarillo L, Romo R. Decoding a perceptual decision process across cortex. Neuron. 2010; 66:300-314. [PubMed: 20435005]
  20. Hikosaka O, Wurtz RH. Modification of saccadic eye movements by GABA-related substances. I. Effect of muscimol and bicuculline in monkey superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 1985; 53:266- 291. [PubMed: 2983037]
  21. Hippenmeyer S, Vrieseling E, Sigrist M, Portmann T, Laengle C, Ladle DR, Arber S. A developmental switch in the response of DRG neurons to ETS transcription factor signaling. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3:e159. [PubMed: 15836427]
  22. Hoffer ZS, Arantes HB, Roth RL, Alloway KD. Functional circuits mediating sensorimotor integration: quantitative comparisons of projections from rodent barrel cortex to primary motor cortex, neostriatum, superior colliculus, and the pons. J Comp Neurol. 2005; 488:82-100. [PubMed: 15912501]
  23. Hooks BM, Mao T, Gutnisky DA, Yamawaki N, Svoboda K, Shepherd GM. Organization of cortical and thalamic input to pyramidal neurons in mouse motor cortex. J Neurosci. 2013; 33:748-760. [PubMed: 23303952]
  24. Huber D, Gutnisky DA, Peron S, O'Connor DH, Wiegert JS, Tian L, Oertner TG, Looger LL, Svoboda K. Multiple dynamic representations in the motor cortex during sensorimotor learning. Nature. 2012; 484:473-478. [PubMed: 22538608]
  25. Hutson KA, Masterton RB. The sensory contribution of a single vibrissa's cortical barrel. J Neurophysiol. 1986; 56:1196-1223. [PubMed: 3783236]
  26. Jackson N, Muthuswamy J. Artificial dural sealant that allows multiple penetrations of implantable brain probes. J Neurosci Methods. 2008; 171:147-152. [PubMed: 18420281]
  27. Kawaguchi Y. Groupings of nonpyramidal and pyramidal cells with specific physiological and morphological characteristics in rat frontal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 69:416-431. [PubMed: 8459275]
  28. Kiritani T, Wickersham IR, Seung HS, Shepherd GM. Hierarchical connectivity and connection- specific dynamics in the corticospinal-corticostriatal microcircuit in mouse motor cortex. J Neurosci. 2012; 32:4992-5001. [PubMed: 22492054]
  29. Kleinfeld D, Deschenes M. Neuronal basis for object location in the vibrissa scanning sensorimotor system. Neuron. 2011; 72:455-468. [PubMed: 22078505]
  30. Knutsen PM, Pietr M, Ahissar E. Haptic object localization in the vibrissal system: behavior and performance. J Neurosci. 2006; 26:8451-8464. [PubMed: 16914670]
  31. Komiyama T, Sato TR, O'Connor DH, Zhang YX, Huber D, Hooks BM, Gabitto M, Svoboda K. Learning-related fine-scale specificity imaged in motor cortex circuits of behaving mice. Nature. 2010; 464:1182-1186. [PubMed: 20376005]
  32. Koralek KA, Jensen KF, Killackey HP. Evidence for two complementary patterns of thalamic input to the rat somatosensory cortex. Brain Res. 1988; 463:346-351. [PubMed: 2461788]
  33. Long MA, Fee MS. Using temperature to analyse temporal dynamics in the songbird motor pathway. Nature. 2008; 456:189-194. [PubMed: 19005546]
  34. Lu SM, Lin RCS. Thalamic afferents of the rat barrel cortex: a light-and electron-microscopic study using Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin as an anterograde tracer. Somatosens Mot Res. 1993; 10:1-16. [PubMed: 8484292]
  35. Luo L, Callaway EM, Svoboda K. Genetic dissection of neural circuits. Neuron. 2008; 57:634-660. [PubMed: 18341986]
  36. Mao T, Kusefoglu D, Hooks BM, Huber D, Petreanu L, Svoboda K. Long-range neuronal circuits underlying the interaction between sensory and motor cortex. Neuron. 2011; 72:111-123. [PubMed: 21982373]
  37. Masino SA, Kwon MC, Dory Y, Frostig RD. Characterization of functional organization within rat barrel cortex using intrinsic signal optical imaging through a thinned skull. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993; 90:9998-10002. [PubMed: 8234348
  38. Matyas F, Sreenivasan V, Marbach F, Wacongne C, Barsy B, Mateo C, Aronoff R, Petersen CC. Motor control by sensory cortex. Science. 2010; 330:1240-1243. [PubMed: 21109671]
  39. McCormick DA, Connors BW, Lighthall JW, Prince DA. Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1985; 54:782- 806. [PubMed: 2999347]
  40. Morishima M, Kawaguchi Y. Recurrent connection patterns of corticostriatal pyramidal cells in frontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2006; 26:4394-4405. [PubMed: 16624959]
  41. Mountcastle VB, Steinmetz MA, Romo R. Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys. J Neurosci. 1990; 10:3032-3044. [PubMed: 2118947]
  42. O'Connor DH, Clack NG, Huber D, Komiyama T, Myers EW, Svoboda K. Vibrissa-based object localization in head-fixed mice. J Neurosci. 2010a; 30:1947-1967. [PubMed: 20130203]
  43. O'Connor DH, Hires SA, Guo ZV, Li N, Yu J, Sun QQ, Huber D, Svoboda K. Neural coding during active somatosensation revealed using illusory touch. Nature neuroscience. 2013; 16:958-965.
  44. O'Connor DH, Huber D, Svoboda K. Reverse engineering the mouse brain. Nature. 2009; 461:923- 929. [PubMed: 19829372]
  45. O'Connor DH, Peron SP, Huber D, Svoboda K. Neural activity in barrel cortex underlying vibrissa- based object localization in mice. Neuron. 2010b; 67:1048-1061. [PubMed: 20869600]
  46. Pammer L, O'Connor DH, Hires SA, Clack NG, Huber D, Myers EW, Svoboda K. The Mechanical Variables Underlying Object Localization along the Axis of the Whisker. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2013; 33:6726-6741. [PubMed: 23595731]
  47. Paxinos, G.; Franklin, HBJ. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: Compact. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004.
  48. Petreanu L, Mao T, Sternson SM, Svoboda K. The subcellular organization of neocortical excitatory connections. Nature. 2009; 457:1142-1145. [PubMed: 19151697]
  49. Ponce CR, Lomber SG, Born RT. Integrating motion and depth via parallel pathways. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11:216-223. [PubMed: 18193039]
  50. Ritt JT, Andermann ML, Moore CI. Embodied information processing: vibrissa mechanics and texture features shape micromotions in actively sensing rats. Neuron. 2008; 57:599-613. [PubMed: 18304488]
  51. Sanders JI, Kepecs A. Choice ball: a response interface for two-choice psychometric discrimination in head-fixed mice. Journal of neurophysiology. 2012; 108:3416-3423. [PubMed: 23019000]
  52. Schwarz C, Hentschke H, Butovas S, Haiss F, Stuttgen MC, Gerdjikov TV, Bergner CG, Waiblinger C. The head-fixed behaving rat--procedures and pitfalls. Somatosensory & motor research. 2010; 27:131-148. [PubMed: 20954892]
  53. Shepherd GM. Corticostriatal connectivity and its role in disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14:278- 291. [PubMed: 23511908]
  54. Simons DJ. Response properties of vibrissa units in rat SI somatosensory neocortex. J Neurophysiol. 1978; 41:798-820. [PubMed: 660231]
  55. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex. Nature. 2006; 444:374-377. [PubMed: 17093408]
  56. Tanji J, Evarts EV. Anticipatory activity of motor cortex neurons in relation to direction of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol. 1976; 39:1062-1068. [PubMed: 824409]
  57. Travers JB, Dinardo LA, Karimnamazi H. Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997; 21:631-647. [PubMed: 9353796]
  58. Voigts J, Sakmann B, Celikel T. Unsupervised whisker tracking in unrestrained behaving animals. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 100:504-515. [PubMed: 18463190]
  59. von Heimendahl M, Itskov PM, Arabzadeh E, Diamond ME. Neuronal activity in rat barrel cortex underlying texture discrimination. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5:e305. [PubMed: 18001152]
  60. Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H. The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res. 1970; 17:205-242. [PubMed: 4904874]
  61. Zainos A, Merchant H, Hernandez A, Salinas E, Romo R. Role of primary somatic sensory cortex in the categorization of tactile stimuli: effects of lesions. Exp Brain Res. 1997; 115:357-360. [PubMed: 9224863]
  62. Zhao S, Ting JT, Atallah HE, Qiu L, Tan J, Gloss B, Augustine GJ, Deisseroth K, Luo M, Graybiel AM, et al. Cell type-specific channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice for optogenetic dissection of neural circuitry function. Nature methods. 2011; 8:745-752. [PubMed: 21985008]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, Z. V., Li, N., Huber, D., Ophir, E., Gutnisky, D., Ting, J. T., Feng, G., & Svoboda, K.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
Svoboda, Karel
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
179-194
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040707073
Cited by
715
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 18
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
perceptual decision making, barrel cortex, anterior lateral motor cortex, short-term memory, optogenetic inhibition, sensorimotor integration, mice
MeSH terms
Channelrhodopsins, Action Potentials, Afferent Pathways, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Operant, Decision Making, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Motion Perception, Nerve Net, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Touch, Vibrissae, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Vesicular Inhibitory Amino Acid Transport Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review