Cited by 601Neuroscience and Music PerceptionMultisensory perception and integrationNeural dynamics and brain function

Representation of Time by Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque

Open access
Leon, Matthew I, Shadlen, Michael N·2003·Neuron

Abstract

The neural basis of time perception is unknown. Here we show that neurons in the posterior parietal cortex (area LIP) represent elapsed time relative to a remembered duration. We trained rhesus monkeys to report whether the duration of a test light was longer or shorter than a remembered "standard" (316 or 800 ms) by making an eye movement to one of two choice targets. While timing the test light, the responses of LIP neurons signaled changes in the monkey's perception of elapsed time. The variability of the neural responses explained the monkey's uncertainty about its temporal judgments. Thus, in addition to their role in spatial processing and sensorimotor integration, posterior parietal neurons encode signals related to the perception of time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00185-5

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dip in firing rate seems to mark the beginning of evidence accumulation.

    “The dip, observed in other studies 2,12–14, seems to mark the beginning of evidence accumulation.”

    From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [12]

  • A time-dependent rise of firing rate in LIP and elsewhere has been interpreted as a representation of elapsed time in the form of a hazard rate or anticipation function.

    “A time-dependent rise of firing rate in LIP and elsewhere has been interpreted as a representation of elapsed time in the form of a hazard rate or anticipation function 12,33–35.”

    From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [12]

  • Previous studies have shown that LIP responses are modulated by many factors, such as attention, expectation, time, motor intention, experienced value, reward, and the prior probability of making an eye movement.

    “In addition, previous studies have shown that LIP responses are modulated by many factors, such as attention, expectation, time, motor intention, experienced value, reward, and the prior probability of making an eye movement12,13,39–42.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leon, M. I., & Shadlen, M. N.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shadlen, Michael N
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
317-327
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983315064
Cited by
601
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
time perception, posterior parietal cortex, lateral intraparietal area, duration memory, temporal judgment, rhesus monkeys, neural variability, temporal uncertainty, eye movements
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Choice Behavior, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Electrodes, Implanted, Eye Movements, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Time Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review