Cited by 124

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hippocampal Lesions Disrupt an Associative Mismatch Process

Honey, R. C., Watt, A., Good, M.·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Novel assays were used to assess inter alia whether the hippocampus is involved in detecting novelty per se or in an associative mismatch process. During training, rats received two audiovisual sequences (tone–left constant light and click–left flashing light). In both sham-operated control rats and those with excitotoxic hippocampal lesions, novel visual targets provoked an orienting response that habituated during training. Moreover, like sham-operated rats, rats with hippocampal lesions acquired associations between the elements of two audiovisual sequences. However, subsequent test trials in which the auditory stimuli preceding the visual targets were switched (click–left constant light and tone–left flashing light) provoked renewed orienting to the visual targets in sham-operated rats but not in hippocampal rats. These results support the view that hippocampal damage results in a failure to detect (or act on) mismatches that are generated when an auditory stimulus associatively evokes the memory of one visual stimulus and a different (familiar) visual stimulus is present in the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-06-02226.1998

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1038/379255a0 · DOI
  2. Ennaceur, 1994, Spontaneous recognition of object configurations in rats: effects of fornix lesions., Exp Brain Res, 100, 85, 10.1007/BF00227281 · DOI
  3. 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.4.305 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0735-7044.111.3.487 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/h0029810 · DOI
  6. Hall G (1991) Perceptual and associative learning. (Clarendon, Oxford). · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-11-07323.1995 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.375 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0735-7044.107.1.23 · DOI
  10. Honey RC, Good M, Manser KL (1998) Negative priming in associative learning: evidence from a serial-habituation procedure. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process, in press. · DOI
  11. Horn, 1964, Habituation of the response to sensory stimuli of neurones in the brain stem of rabbits., Nature, 202, 296, 10.1038/202296b0 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0165-0270(89)90149-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/h0077832 · DOI
  14. Mackintosh, 1987, Neurobiology, psychology and habituation., Behav Res Ther, 12, 81, 10.1016/0005-7967(87)90079-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00014.x · DOI
  16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-10-04549.1993 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0301-0082(79)90005-4 · DOI
  18. O’Keefe J Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. (Oxford UP, Oxford).
  19. 10.1007/BF00269447 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/brain/105.4.611 · DOI
  21. Schacter, 1996, Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: evidence from positron emission tomography., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 10, 131
  22. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.195 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1837 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/cercor/6.1.71 · DOI
  25. Vinogradova OS (1975) Registration of information and the limbic system. in Short-term changes in the neural activity and behavior, eds Horn G Hinde RA (Cambridge UP, Cambridge), pp 95–148.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Honey, R. C., Watt, A., & Good, M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-03-15
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
2226-2230
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
124
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review