The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
D1- Versus D2-Receptor Modulation of Visuospatial Working Memory in Humans
Open accessAbstract
The effects of pergolide, a mixed D1/D2 receptor agonist, and bromocriptine, a selective D2 receptor agonist, were assessed in a visual delay task to further investigate the “dopamine link” of working memory in humans and to look for differential D1 versus D2 receptor contributions. Two groups of 32 healthy young adults (16 female) received either 0.1 mg of pergolide or 2.5 mg of bromocriptine in a placebo-controlled cross-over design. A pretreatment with domperidone, a peripherally active D2 antagonist, was performed in both groups to reduce side effects. Interindividual differences in pharmacokinetics were controlled by the time course of serum prolactin inhibition. The working memory paradigm was a visuospatial delayed matching task; the location of a randomly generated seven-point pattern had to be memorized and compared after 2, 8, or 16 sec with a second pattern that was either identical or slightly shifted within a reference frame. The task was designed with the intention to present unique stimuli at each trial and to require minimal motor demands. Practice effects between the two pharmacological test days were minimized by training sessions that preceded the tests. The paradigm showed significant error and reaction time increases with longer delays. After comparable doses, only pergolide, but not bromocriptine, facilitated visuospatial working memory performance as demonstrated by a significant drug-by-delay interaction. These findings are in accordance with the monkey literature as well as with neuroanatomical findings, and they confirm a preferential role of prefrontal D1 receptors for working memory modulation in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task
Cohen, J. D., Perlstein, W. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Noll, D. C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386604a0 · Cited by 1,876
Modulation of memory fields by dopamine Dl receptors in prefrontal cortex
Williams, G. V., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376572a0 · Cited by 1,593
Cognitive Deficit Caused by Regional Depletion of Dopamine in Prefrontal Cortex of Rhesus Monkey
Brozoski, T. J., Brown, R. M., Rosvold, H. E., & Goldman, P. S. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.112679 · Cited by 1,500
D1 Dopamine Receptors in Prefrontal Cortex: Involvement in Working Memory
Sawaguchi, T., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1825731 · Cited by 1,364
Preferential activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli
Mirenowicz, J., & Schultz, W. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379449a0 · Cited by 829
Reward expectancy in primate prefrental neurons
Watanabe, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382629a0 · Cited by 684 · cited 2×
“frontal neurons (Watanabe, 1996) are preferentially activated by”
ResultDopamine D1 receptor mechanisms in the cognitive performance of young adult and aged monkeys
Arnsten, A. F. T., Cai, J. X., Murphy, B. L., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1994) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245056 · Cited by 566
Effects of methylphenidate on spatial working memory and planning in healthy young adults
Elliott, R., Sahakian, B. J., Matthews, K., Bannerjea, A., Rimmer, J., & Robbins, T. W. (1997) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050284 · Cited by 389
Tyrosine reverses a cold-induced working memory deficit in humans
Shurtleff, D., Thomas, J. R., Schrot, J., Kowalski, K., & Harford, R. (1994) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0091-3057(94)90299-2 · Cited by 142 · cited 2×
“The 8 and 16 sec delay lengths were taken from the literature (Shurtleff et al., 1994; Fuster, 1995).”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529 · Cited by 2,270
Inverted-U–Shaped Dopamine Actions on Human Working Memory and Cognitive Control
Cools, R., & D'Esposito, M. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028 · Cited by 1,673
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
D'Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031 · Cited by 1,653
Training and plasticity of working memory
Klingberg, T. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002 · Cited by 1,585
Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: A challenge for neuroscience and medicine
Merker, B. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07000891 · Cited by 868
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, U., von Cramon, D. Y., & Pollmann, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2720-2728
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2124540231
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: D1- Versus D2-Receptor Modulation of Visuospatial Working Memory in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-07-02720.1998
- The paper
- Müller, U., von Cramon, D. Y., & Pollmann, S. (1998). D1- Versus D2-Receptor Modulation of Visuospatial Working Memory in Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-07-02720.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.