Cited by 438Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismNeural dynamics and brain function

Extrasynaptic Glutamate Diffusion in the Hippocampus: Ultrastructural Constraints, Uptake, and Receptor Activation

Open access
Rusakov, Dmitri A., Kullmann, Dimitri M.·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Fast excitatory synapses are generally thought to act as private communication channels between presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. Some recent findings, however, suggest that glutamate may diffuse out of the synaptic cleft and bind to several subtypes of receptors, either in the perisynaptic membrane or at neighboring synapses. It is not known whether activation of these receptors can occur in response to the release of a single vesicle of glutamate. Here we estimate the spatiotemporal profile of glutamate in the extrasynaptic space after vesicle exocytosis, guided by detailed ultrastructural measurements of the CA1 neuropil in the adult rat. We argue that the vicinity of the synapse can be treated as an isotropic porous medium, in which diffusion is determined by the extracellular volume fraction and the tortuosity factor, and develop novel stereological methods to estimate these parameters. We also estimate the spatial separation between synapses, to ask whether glutamate released at one synapse can activate NMDA and other high-affinity receptors at a neighboring synapse. Kinetic simulations of extrasynaptic glutamate uptake show that transporters rapidly reduce the free concentration of transmitter. Exocytosis of a single vesicle is, however, sufficient to bind to high-affinity receptors situated in the immediate perisynaptic space. The distance separating a typical synapse from its nearest neighbor is ∼465 nm. Whether glutamate can reach a sufficient concentration to activate NMDA receptors at this distance depends critically on the diffusion coefficient in the extracellular space. If diffusion is much slower than in free aqueous solution, NMDA receptors could mediate crosstalk between neighboring synapses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-09-03158.1998

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two-photon excitation of MNI-glutamate permits functional mapping of glutamate sensitivity with a spatiotemporal resolution similar to that achieved by activation of presynaptic terminals (~0.4 μm and ~0.1 ms).

    “Nevertheless, two-photon excitation of MNI-glutamate permits the functional mapping of glutamate sensitivity with a spatiotemporal resolution similar to that achieved by activation of presynaptic terminals (~0.4μm and ~0.1 ms)28.”

    From Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (2001) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Synaptic currents and Activation of extrasynaptic receptors sections discuss modeled glutamate diffusion and receptor activation at distances around 400–465 nm; they do not describe the resolution of functional mapping. Searches for MNI-glutamate, two-photon excitation, and the claimed 0.1 ms resolution found no passage addressing the comparison with presynaptic-terminal activation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Thin spines and filopodia may be postsynaptic components of silent synapses.

    “In addition, our study suggests that thin spines and filopodia may be postsynaptic components of silent synapses28, 32, 34, 44.”

    From Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons (2001) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Activation of extrasynaptic receptors section discusses NMDA-receptor activation at neighboring synapses and notes that dendritic spines may change shape, but does not identify thin spines or filopodia as components of silent synapses. Searches for “filopodia,” “thin spines,” and “silent synapses” found no passage making that connection; silent synapses appear in the References. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diff usion. Oxford: C larendon Press.
  2. Rusakov DA, Harrison E, Stewart MG (1998) Synapses in hippocampus occupy only 1-2% of cell membranes and are spaced less than half- micron apart. Neuropharmacology, in press.
  3. Stoyan D, Kendall WS, Mecke J (1987) Stochastic geometry and its applications. Chichester, UK : Wiley.
  4. Underwood EE (1970) Quantitative stereology. Reading, MA: Addison -Wesley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rusakov, D. A., & Kullmann, D. M.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
3158-3170
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1897919376
Cited by
438
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hippocampal CA1, NMDA receptor, glutamate transporters, stereology, tortuosity, extracellular volume fraction, ultrastructure
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Computer Simulation, Diffusion, Hippocampus, Male, Surface Properties, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, AMPA, Glutamic Acid, Neuropil, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review