The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time-Dependent Reversal of Long-Term Potentiation by an Integrin Antagonist
Open accessAbstract
The integrin antagonist Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro (GRGDSP) was applied by local ejection to one of two recording sites in hippocampal slices at various times before and after long-term potentiation (LTP) was induced at both sites with theta burst stimulation. Applications 10 min before, immediately after, and 10 min after induction caused LTP at the experimental site to decay steadily relative to that at the within-slice control site. However, application at 25 min or more after induction had no detectable effect on potentiation. Similar results were obtained when the integrin antagonist was perfused into the slice rather than applied locally. The time period after induction during which GRGDSP interfered with LTP consolidation corresponds to that during which LTP is susceptible to reversal by low-frequency afferent stimulation and newly formed memories are vulnerable to various disruptive treatments. Comparable experiments using a peptide that blocks an extracellular binding site of neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAMs) did not yield time-dependent reversal of LTP; i.e., an antagonist that interacts with the fourth immunoglobulin-like domain reduced LTP when applied before induction but not afterward. Moreover, LTP formation occurred normally in the presence of an antibody against the fibronectin repeat domain of NCAM. These results suggest that integrin activation and signaling occurring over several minutes after LTP induction are necessary for stabilizing synaptic potentiation and by inference may be required for the conversion of new memories into a not readily disrupted state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The RGD sequence is a short amino acid motif essential for cell adhesion. It is found in various cell adhesion molecules, and its importance in recognizing and binding to integrins and the role in plasticity and LTP have been widely documented (Bahr et al. 1997; Stäubli et al. 1998; Watson et al. 2007).”
From The Serine/Threonine Kinase NDR2 Regulates Integrin Signaling, Synapse Formation, and Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampus (2025) · cites this paper as Stäubli et al. 1998
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calcium's Role in Mechanotransduction during Muscle Development
Damm, T. B., & Egli, M. (2014) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000356667 · Cited by 14,552
Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion
Hynes, R. O. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90115-s · Cited by 9,857
Pierschbacher, M. D., & Ruoslahti, E. I. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/309030a0 · Cited by 3,690
Focal Adhesions: Transmembrane Junctions Between the Extracellular Matrix and the Cytoskeleton
Burridge, K., Fath, K. R., Kelly, T. J., Nuckolls, G. H., & Turner, C. E. (1988) · Annual Review of Cell Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002415 · Cited by 2,120
Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex
Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, M. (1997) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80010-4 · Cited by 1,924
Interaction of plasma membrane fibronectin receptor with talin—a transmembrane linkage
Horwitz, A. F., Duggan, K., Buck, C. A., Beckerle, M. C., & Burridge, K. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/320531a0 · Cited by 1,191
Isackson, P. J., Huntsman, M. M., Murray, K. D., & Gall, C. M. (1991) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(91)90234-q · Cited by 711 · cited 2×
“, 1997), the link to MAP kinases could account for the gene induction reported to occur with high-frequency synaptic activity (Isackson et al., 1991; Andreasson and Worley, 1995; Link et al., 1995) and potentially could add a genomic contribution to the later stages of LTP consolidation.”
BackgroundSomatodendritic expression of an immediate early gene is regulated by synaptic activity.
Link, W., Konietzko, U., Kauselmann, G., Krug, M., Schwanke, B., Frey, U., & Kuhl, D. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.12.5734 · Cited by 710
Integrin-mediated cell adhesion activates mitogen-activated protein kinases.
Chen, Q., Kinch, M. S., Lin, T., Burridge, K., & Juliano, R. L. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47058-5 · Cited by 660
PSA-NCAM is required for activity-induced synaptic plasticity.
Muller, D., Wang, C., Skibo, G. G., Toni, N., Cremer, H., Calaora, V., Rougon, G., & Kiss, J. Z. (1996) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80174-9 · Cited by 625
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Russell RW (1959) Brain, memory, learning. (Clarendon, Oxford).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Synaptic Plasticity and Memory: An Evaluation of the Hypothesis
Martin, S. J., Grimwood, P. D., & Morris, R. G. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649 · Cited by 2,794
Structural plasticity and memory
Lamprecht, R., & LeDoux, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1301 · Cited by 1,010
Extracellular matrix molecules and synaptic plasticity
Dityatev, A., & Schachner, M. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1115 · Cited by 564
New life in an old idea: The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis revisited
Martin, S. J., & Morris, R. (2002) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.10107 · Cited by 461
Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine development and remodeling
Ethell, I. M., & Pasquale, E. B. (2005) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.02.003 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Stäubli, U., Chun, D., & Lynch, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- ORCID
- Lynch, Gary
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3460-3469
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6792671
- OpenAlex
- W1555498151
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Whitehall Foundation
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
- Keywords
- long-term potentiation, integrin antagonism, GRGDSP peptide, hippocampus, theta burst stimulation, CD56, synaptic potentiation, memory consolidation, integrin signaling
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Binding, Competitive, Electric Stimulation, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligopeptides, Time Factors, Integrins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
