Cited by 65Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Protease inhibitor coinfusion with amyloid β-protein results in enhanced deposition and toxicity in rat brain

Open access
Frautschy, Sally A., Horn, David L., Sigel, Jason J., Harris-White, Marni E., Mendoza, John J., Yang, Fusheng, Saido, T. C., Cole, Gregory M.·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Amyloid β-protein, Aβ, is normally produced in brain and is cleared by unknown mechanisms. In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Aβ accumulates in plaque-like deposits and is implicated genetically in neurodegeneration. Here we investigate mechanisms for Aβ degradation and Aβ toxicityin vivo, focusing on the effects of Aβ40, which is the peptide that accumulates in apolipoprotein E4-associated AD. Chronic intraventricular infusion of Aβ40 into rat brain resulted in limited deposition and toxicity. Coinfusion of Aβ40 with the cysteine protease inhibitor leupeptin resulted in increased extracellular and intracellular Aβ immunoreactivity. Analysis of gliosis and TUNEL in neuron layers of the frontal and entorhinal cortex suggested that leupeptin exacerbated Aβ40 toxicity. This was supported further by the neuronal staining of cathepsin B in endosomes or lysosomes, colocalizing with intracellular Aβ immunoreactivity in pyknotic cells. Leupeptin plus Aβ40 caused limited but significant neuronal phospho-tau immunostaining in the entorhinal cortex. Intriguingly, Aβ40 plus leupeptin induced intracellular accumulation of the more toxic Aβ, Aβ42, in a small group of septal neurons. Leupeptin infusion previously has been reported to interfere with lysosomal proteolysis and to result in the accumulation of lipofuscin, dystrophic neurites, tau- and ubiquitin-positive inclusions, and structures resembling paired helical filaments. Coinfusion of Aβ40 with the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin also increased diffuse extracellular deposition but reduced astrocytosis and TUNEL and was not associated with intracellular Aβ staining. Collectively, these data suggest that an age or Alzheimer’s-related defect in lysosomal/endosomal function could promote Aβ deposition and DNA fragmentation in neurons and glia similar to that found in Alzheimer’s disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-20-08311.1998

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the brains of human AD patients and transgenic AD mouse models, infiltration of activated astrocytes and microglia is seen in the area of Aβ plaques.

    “In the brains of human AD patients and transgenic AD mouse models, infiltration of activated astrocytes and microglia are seen in the area of A␤ plaques (Itagaki et al., 1989;Frautschy et al., 1998;Stalder et al., 1999;Bornemann et al., 2001;Matsuoka et al., 2001)”
  • The significant decrease in activated microglia and astrocytes seen in ATRA-treated APP/PS1 mice can be attributed to its inhibition of Aβ accumulation.

    “Given the central role of fibrillar A␤ in the activation of microglia and astrocytes seen in AD brain (Rozemuller et al., 2005) and in AD animal models (Frautschy et al., 1998;Apelt and Schliebs, 2001;Matsuoka et al., 2001), the significant decrease in activated microglia and astrocytes seen in the ATRA-treated APP/PS1 mice can be attributed to its inhibition of A␤ accumulation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frautschy, S. A., Horn, D. L., Sigel, J. J., Harris-White, M. E., Mendoza, J. J., Yang, F., Saido, T. C., & Cole, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • RIKEN (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-10-15
Volume
18
Issue
20
Pages
8311-8321
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W4328001100
Cited by
65
References
64
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG1125, R01AG016793, R01AG010685, AG10685)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA091343)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
amyloid-beta, Aβ40, amyloid-beta 42, leupeptin, aprotinin, cysteine protease inhibitors, serine protease inhibitors, lysosomal dysfunction, endosomal dysfunction, amyloid deposition, neurotoxicity, cathepsin B, tau phosphorylation, DNA fragmentation, astrocyte activation, gliosis, Alzheimer's disease, entorhinal cortex, septal neurons, intraventricular infusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review