The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons
Open accessAbstract
It is well established that multiple stimulus dimensions (e.g., orientation and spatial frequency) are mapped onto the surface of striate cortex. However, the detailed organization of neurons within a local region of striate cortex remains unclear. Within a vertical column, do all neurons have the same response selectivities? And if not, how do they most commonly differ and why? To address these questions, we recorded from nearby pairs of simple cells and made detailed spatiotemporal maps of their receptive fields. From these maps, we extracted and analyzed a variety of response metrics. Our results provide new insights into the local organization of striate cortex. First, we show that nearby neurons seldom have very similar receptive fields, when these fields are characterized in space and time. Thus, there may be less redundancy within a column than previously thought. Moreover, we show that correlated discharge increases with receptive field similarity; thus, the local dissimilarity between neurons may allow for noise reduction by response pooling. Second, we show that several response variables are clustered within striate cortex, including some that have not received much attention such as response latency and temporal frequency. We also demonstrate that other parameters are not clustered, including the spatial phase (or symmetry) of the receptive field. Third, we show that spatial phase is the single parameter that accounts for most of the difference between receptive fields of nearby neurons. We consider the implications of this local diversity of spatial phase for population coding and construction of higher-order receptive fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion
Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000284 · Cited by 3,442
Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1977) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1977.0085 · Cited by 2,608
The columnar organization of the neocortex
Mountcastle, V. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.4.701 · Cited by 2,247
Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance
Zohary, E., Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370140a0 · Cited by 1,237
Model of human visual-motion sensing
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000322 · Cited by 1,170
Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1974) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901580304 · Cited by 1,037
Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488 · Cited by 890
Iso-orientation domains in cat visual cortex are arranged in pinwheel-like patterns
Bonhoeffer, T., & Grinvald, A. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/353429a0 · Cited by 873
Ts'o, D., Gilbert, C., & Wiesel, T. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-04-01160.1986 · Cited by 842
SENSE AND THE SINGLE NEURON: Probing the Physiology of Perception
Parker, A. J., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.227 · Cited by 801
Cited by
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Shadlen, M. N., & Movshon, J. A. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80822-3 · Cited by 606
The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration
Gray, C. M. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80820-x · Cited by 541
von der Malsburg, C. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80825-9 · Cited by 501
Metadata
- Authors
- DeAngelis, G. C., Ghose, G. M., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-05-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4046-4064
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2142143511
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04046.1999
- The paper
- DeAngelis, G. C., Ghose, G. M., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D. (1999). Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04046.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.