The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mirror-Image Sensitivity and Invariance in Object and Scene Processing Pathways
Open accessAbstract
Electrophysiological and behavioral studies in many species have demonstrated mirror-image confusion for objects, perhaps because many objects are vertically symmetric (e.g., a cup is the same cup when seen in left or right profile). In contrast, the navigability of a scene changes when it is mirror reversed, and behavioral studies reveal high sensitivity to this change. Thus, we predicted that representations in object-selective cortex will be unaffected by mirror reversals, whereas representations in scene-selective cortex will be sensitive to such reversals. To test this hypothesis, we ran an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation experiment in human adults. Consistent with our prediction, we found tolerance to mirror reversals in one object-selective region, the posterior fusiform sulcus, and a strong sensitivity to these reversals in two scene-selective regions, the transverse occipital sulcus and the retrosplenial complex. However, a more posterior object-selective region, the lateral occipital sulcus, showed sensitivity to mirror reversals, suggesting that the sense information that distinguishes mirror images is represented at earlier stages in the object-processing hierarchy. Moreover, one scene-selective region (the parahippocampal place area or PPA) was tolerant to mirror reversals. This last finding challenges the hypothesis that the PPA is involved in navigation and reorientation and suggests instead that scenes, like objects, are processed by distinct pathways guiding recognition and action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00108-4 · Cited by 963
Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy
Aguirre, G. K. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.9.1613 · Cited by 772
Viewpoint-Specific Scene Representations in Human Parahippocampal Cortex
Epstein, R., Graham, K. S., & Downing, P. E. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00117-x · Cited by 360
Pure topographic disorientation due to right retrosplenial lesion
Takahashi, N., Kawamura, M., Shiota, J., Kasahata, N., & Hirayama, K. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.49.2.464 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3924 · Cited by 716
What is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?
Cohen, M. A., Dennett, D. C., & Kanwisher, N. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.006 · Cited by 419
Self-citationStructuring knowledge with cognitive maps and cognitive graphs
Peer, M., Brunec, I. K., Newcombe, N. S., & Epstein, R. A. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.004 · Cited by 283
Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks
Auger, S. D., Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043620 · Cited by 205
Neural evidence supports a novel framework for spatial navigation
Chrastil, E. R. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0351-6 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Dilks, D. D., Julian, J. B., Kubilius, J., Spelke, E. S., & Kanwisher, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-08-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 11305-11312
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2045302518
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mirror-Image Sensitivity and Invariance in Object and Scene Processing Pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1935-11.2011
- The paper
- Dilks, D. D., Julian, J. B., Kubilius, J., Spelke, E. S., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Mirror-Image Sensitivity and Invariance in Object and Scene Processing Pathways. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1935-11.2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.