Cited by 51Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing

Rapid Ultrastructural Changes in the PSD and Surrounding Membrane after Induction of Structural LTP in Single Dendritic Spines

Open access
Sun, Ye, Smirnov, Michael, Kamasawa, Naomi, Yasuda, Ryohei·2021·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The structural plasticity of dendritic spines is considered to be an important basis of synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory. Here, we induced input-specific structural LTP (sLTP) in single dendritic spines in organotypic hippocampal slices from mice of either sex and performed ultrastructural analyses of the spines using efficient correlative light and electron microscopy. We observed reorganization of the PSD nanostructure, such as perforation and segmentation, at 2–3, 20, and 120 min after sLTP induction. In addition, PSD and nonsynaptic axon–spine interface (nsASI) membrane expanded unevenly during sLTP. Specifically, the PSD area showed a transient increase at 2–3 min after sLTP induction. The PSD growth was to a degree less than spine volume growth at 2–3 min and 20 min after sLTP induction but became similar at 120 min. On the other hand, the nsASI area showed a profound and lasting expansion, to a degree similar to spine volume growth throughout the process. These rapid ultrastructural changes in PSD and surrounding membrane may contribute to rapid electrophysiological plasticity during sLTP. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT To understand the ultrastructural changes during synaptic plasticity, it is desired to efficiently image single dendritic spines that underwent structural plasticity in electron microscopy. We induced structural long-term potentiation (sLTP) in single dendritic spines by two-photon glutamate uncaging. We then identified the same spines at different phases of sLTP and performed ultrastructural analysis by using an efficient correlative light and electron microscopy method. We found that postsynaptic density undergoes dramatic modification in its structural complexity immediately after sLTP induction. Meanwhile, the nonsynaptic axon–spine interface area shows a rapid and sustained increase throughout sLTP. Our results indicate that the uneven modification of synaptic and nonsynaptic postsynaptic membrane might contribute to rapid electrophysiological plasticity during sLTP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1964-20.2021

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LTP is associated with a long-lasting increase in spine size, including a late increase in the size of the PSD and a slow increase in the size of the presynaptic bouton.

    “LTP is associated with a long-lasting increase in spine size (247, 248), including a late increase in the size of the PSD (56, 213, 414, 415) and additionally a slow increase in the size of the presynaptic bouton (213, 414).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [415]

    The Introduction and PSD-reorganization section describe spine enlargement after LTP and PSD growth that lags spine-volume growth by hours. The Discussion mentions presynaptic bouton volume change, but does not establish the claimed slow increase in bouton size. The paper also reports that late-phase spine volume was not significantly different from controls. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Y., Smirnov, M., Kamasawa, N., & Yasuda, R.
Affiliations
Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2021-07-15
Volume
41
Issue
33
Pages
7003-7014
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W3177926500
Cited by
51
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080047)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (DP1NS096787, R35NS116804)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Keywords
dendritic spines, postsynaptic density, ultrastructural changes, synaptic plasticity, organotypic hippocampal slices, correlative light and electron microscopy
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Cell Membrane, Female, Glutamates, Hippocampus, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Indoles, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Photochemistry, Long-Term Potentiation, Biolistics, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Post-Synaptic Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review