Cited by 20Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological diseases and metabolismIron Metabolism and Disorders

Iron deposition and distribution across the hippocampus is associated with pattern separation and pattern completion in older adults at risk for Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Zhou, Jing, Wearn, Alfie, Huck, Julia, Hughes, Colleen, Baracchini, Giulia, Tremblay-Mercier, Jennifer, Poirier, Judes, Villeneuve, Sylvia +7 more·2024·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Elevated iron deposition in the brain has been observed in older adult humans and persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and has been associated with lower cognitive performance. We investigated the impact of iron deposition, and its topographical distribution across hippocampal subfields and segments (anterior, posterior) measured along its longitudinal axis, on episodic memory in a sample of cognitively unimpaired older adults at elevated familial risk for AD (N = 172, 120 females, 52 males; mean age = 68.8 ± 5.4 years). MRI-based quantitative susceptibility maps were acquired to derive estimates of hippocampal iron deposition. The Mnemonic Similarity Task was used to measure pattern separation and pattern completion, two hippocampally mediated episodic memory processes. Greater hippocampal iron load was associated with lower pattern separation and higher pattern completion scores, both indicators of poorer episodic memory. Examination of iron levels within hippocampal subfields across its long axis revealed topographic specificity. Among the subfields and segments investigated here, iron deposition in the posterior hippocampal CA1 was the most robustly and negatively associated with the fidelity memory representations. This association remained after controlling for hippocampal volume and was observed in the context of normal performance on standard neuropsychological memory measures. These findings reveal that the impact of iron load on episodic memory performance is not uniform across the hippocampus. Both iron deposition levels as well as its spatial distribution, must be taken into account when examining the relationship between hippocampal iron and episodic memory in older adults at elevated risk for AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1973-23.2024

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The olfactory bulb is affected early in AD, playing an important role in the onset and progression of the disease.

    “The OLF is affected early in AD, playing an important role in the onset and progression of the disease (Zhou et al., 2024).”

    From Multimodal MRI combined with RNA sequencing reveals pathological signatures in the 9-month-old 3×Tg-AD mouse brain (2026) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2024

    The Introduction and Discussion address early AD-related changes in the hippocampus, particularly iron deposition, but do not address the olfactory bulb. Searches for “olfactory bulb,” “OLF,” and early olfactory involvement in AD found no passage supporting the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ally BA (2012) Using pictures and words to understand recognition memory deterioration in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dis- ease: a review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 12:687-694.
  2. Xie L, Wisse LEM, Manjon JV, Wang H, Das RS, Wolk DA, Yushkevich PA (2016) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - MICCAI 2016. p. 564-571.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, J., Wearn, A., Huck, J., Hughes, C., Baracchini, G., Tremblay-Mercier, J., Poirier, J., Villeneuve, S., Tardif, C. L., Chakravarty, M. M., Daugherty, A. M., Gauthier, C. J., Turner, G. R., Spreng, R. N., & PREVENT-AD Research Group
Affiliations
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2024-02-22
Volume
44
Issue
19
Pages
e1973232024
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W4392028257
Cited by
20
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (R01AG068563)
  • Alzheimer's Association (AARG-22-927100)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
pattern separation, pattern completion, episodic memory, Alzheimer's disease risk, quantitative susceptibility mapping, hippocampal subfields, CA1, older adults, memory fidelity
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Iron, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review