Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for Differential Cortical Input to Direct Pathway versus Indirect Pathway Striatal Projection Neurons in Rats

Open access
Lei, Wanlong, Jiao, Yun, Del Mar, Nobel, Reiner, Anton·2004·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The two main types of corticostriatal neurons are those that project only intratelencephalically (IT-type), the intrastriatal terminals of which are 0.41 μm in mean diameter, and those that send their main axon into pyramidal tract and have a collateral projection to striatum (PT-type), the intrastriatal terminals of which are 0.82 μm in mean diameter. We used three approaches to examine whether the two striatal projection neuron types (striatonigral direct pathway vs striatopallidal indirect pathway) differ in their input from IT-type and PT-type neurons. First, we retrogradely labeled one striatal projection neuron type or the other with biotinylated dextran amine (BDA)-3000 molecular weight. We found that terminals making asymmetric axospinous contact with striatonigral neurons were 0.43 μm in mean diameter, whereas those making asymmetric axospinous contact with striatopallidal neurons were 0.69 μm. Second, we preferentially immunolabeled striatonigral neurons for D 1 dopamine receptors or striatopallidal neurons for D 2 dopamine receptors and found that axospinous terminals had a smaller mean size (0.45 μm) on D 1 + spines than on D 2 + spines (0.61 μm). Finally, we combined selective BDA labeling of IT-type or PT-type terminals with immunolabeling for D 1 or D 2 , and found that IT-type terminals were twice as common as PT-type on D 1 + spines, whereas PT-type terminals were four times as common as IT-type on D 2 + spines. These various results suggest that striatonigral neurons preferentially receive input from IT-type cortical neurons, whereas striatopallidal neurons receive greater input from PT-type cortical neurons. This differential cortical connectivity may further the roles of the direct and indirect pathways in promoting desired movements and suppressing unwanted movements, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1990-04.2004

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Lei, W., Jiao, Y., Del Mar, N., & Reiner, A.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2004-09-22
Volume
24
Issue
38
Pages
8289-8299
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2019078397
Cited by
277
References
59
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Differential Cortical Input to Direct Pathway versus Indirect Pathway Striatal Projection Neurons in Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1990-04.2004
The paper
Lei, W., Jiao, Y., Del Mar, N., & Reiner, A. (2004). Evidence for Differential Cortical Input to Direct Pathway versus Indirect Pathway Striatal Projection Neurons in Rats. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1990-04.2004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.