The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing
Open accessAbstract
This functional magnetic resonance imaging study investigated the impact of early auditory deprivation and/or use of a visuospatial language [American sign language (ASL)] on the organization of neural systems important in visual motion processing by comparing hearing controls with deaf and hearing native signers. Participants monitored moving flowfields under different conditions of spatial and featural attention. Recruitment of the motion-selective area MT–MST in hearing controls was observed to be greater when attention was directed centrally and when the task was to detect motion features, confirming previous reports that the motion network is selectively modulated by different aspects of attention. More importantly, we observed marked differences in the recruitment of motion-related areas as a function of early experience. First, the lateralization of MT–MST was found to shift toward the left hemisphere in early signers, suggesting that early exposure to ASL leads to a greater reliance on the left MT–MST. Second, whereas the two hearing populations displayed more MT–MST activation under central than peripheral attention, the opposite pattern was observed in deaf signers, indicating enhanced recruitment of MT–MST during peripheral attention after early deafness. Third, deaf signers, but neither of the hearing populations, displayed increased activation of the posterior parietal cortex, supporting the view that parietal functions are modified after early auditory deprivation. Finally, only in deaf signers did attention to motion result in enhanced recruitment of the posterior superior temporal sulcus, establishing for the first time in humans that this polymodal area is modified after early sensory deprivation. Together these results highlight the functional and regional specificity of neuroplasticity in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01501-1 · Cited by 2,461
The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72999 · Cited by 1,876
Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/73009 · Cited by 1,816
Recanzone, G., Schreiner, C., & Merzenich, M. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00087.1993 · Cited by 1,266
Corbetta, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.831 · Cited by 995
Calvert, G. A., Campbell, R., & Brammer, M. J. (2000) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00513-3 · Cited by 954
A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment
Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., & Davis, K. D. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72991 · Cited by 947
A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention
Brefczynski, J. A., & DeYoe, E. A. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/7280 · Cited by 723
Learning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex
Crist, R. E., Li, W., & Gilbert, C. D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/87470 · Cited by 364
The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion. A functional MRI study
Buchel, C. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.7.1281 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load
Lavie, N. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004 · Cited by 2,102
Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?
Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn848 · Cited by 1,040
Self-citationNeural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change
Merabet, L. B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2758 · Cited by 751
Do deaf individuals see better?
Bavelier, D., Dye, M. W. G., & Hauser, P. C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006 · Cited by 506
Self-citationFine, I., Finney, E. M., Boynton, G. M., & Dobkins, K. R. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892905774597173 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Bavelier, D., Brozinsky, C., Tomann, A., Mitchell, T., Neville, H., & Liu, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2001-11-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8931-8942
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2110560244
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.21-22-08931.2001
- The paper
- Bavelier, D., Brozinsky, C., Tomann, A., Mitchell, T., Neville, H., & Liu, G. (2001). Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-22-08931.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.