The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture
Open accessAbstract
Attention can be directed either voluntarily based on the goals of the individual or involuntarily "captured" by salient stimuli in the immediate environment. Although involuntary capture is a critical means of directing attention, the completion of many common tasks requires our ability to ignore salient, but otherwise irrelevant stimuli while restricting our attention to stimuli that are related to our goals. Here, we report neurophysiological measures of spatial attention in humans that gauge an individual's ability to resist attentional capture from salient but irrelevant information. By measuring the rapid reallocation of spatial attention immediately after the onset of distractors, we observe that the ability to override attentional capture varies substantially across individuals and is strongly predicted by the specific working memory capacity of each person. High-capacity individuals were much more capable of resisting attentional capture than low-capacity individuals, who involuntarily reallocated spatial attention when distractors were present in the display. These results provide evidence that the poor attentional abilities associated with low memory capacity may stem from an inability to override attentional capture in the initial moments after the onset of distracting information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“Although involuntary attentional capture is an ecologically critical mechanism for detecting potentially important stimuli in the environment (Breitmeyer and Ganz, 1976), it often comes at the expense of goal-driven behavior (Posner, 1980; Berger et al., 2005).”
BackgroundNeural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 · Cited by 2,487
Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices
Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138071 · Cited by 2,380
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47 · Cited by 1,725 · cited 3×
“Indeed, many cognitive tasks require the ability to ignore signals from salient but irrelevant stimuli so that we may restrict attention to stimuli that are related to our goals (Kane and Engle, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodPrefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory
McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2024 · Cited by 989
Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis
Halford, G. S., Cowan, N., & Andrews, G. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.001 · Cited by 324
Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation
Bleckley, M. K., Durso, F. T., Crutchfield, J. M., Engle, R. W., & Khanna, M. M. (2003) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196548 · Cited by 156
Cited by
Value-driven attentional capture
Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1104047108 · Cited by 1,098
Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval
Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2014) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.003 · Cited by 528
Self-citationSawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.6.1455 · Cited by 487
The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control
Shipstead, Z., Lindsey, D. R. B., Marshall, R. L., & Engle, R. W. (2014) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.004 · Cited by 330
Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing
Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0348-2 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-07-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 8726-8733
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2068671308
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2145-09.2009
- The paper
- Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2145-09.2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
