Cited by 528Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval

Open access
Unsworth, Nash, Fukuda, Keisuke, Awh, Edward, Vogel, Edward K.·2014·Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Several theories have been put forth to explain the relation between working memory (WM) and gF. Unfortunately, no single factor has been shown to fully account for the relation between these two important constructs. In the current study we tested whether multiple factors (capacity, attention control, and secondary memory) would collectively account for the relation. A large number of participants performed multiple measures of each construct and latent variable analyses were used to examine the data. The results demonstrated that capacity, attention control, and secondary memory were uniquely related to WM storage, WM processing, and gF. Importantly, the three factors completely accounted for the relation between WM (both processing and storage) and gF. Thus, although storage and processing make independent contributions to gF, both of these contributions are accounted for by variation in capacity, attention control and secondary memory. These results are consistent with the multifaceted view of WM, suggesting that individual differences in capacity, attention control, and secondary memory jointly account for individual differences in WM and its relation with gF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.003

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baddeley AD Hitch G Bower GH Working memory The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1974 8 47 89 Academic Press New York
  2. Cowan N Working memory capacity 2005 Psychology Press Hove, East Sussex, UK

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
71
Pages
1-26
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100431648
Cited by
528
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 14
FWCI
62.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087214)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
working memory, fluid intelligence, working memory capacity, attentional control, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Mental Recall, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review