Cited by 177Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Imaging spatiotemporal dynamics of surround inhibition in the barrels somatosensory cortex

Open access
Derdikman, Dori, Hildesheim, Rina, Ahissar, Ehud, Arieli, Amos, Grinvald, Amiram·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Sensory processing and its perception require that local information would also be available globally. Indeed, in the mammalian neocortex, local excitation spreads over large distances via the long-range horizontal connections in layer 2/3 and may spread over an entire cortical area if excitatory polysynaptic pathways are also activated. Therefore, a balance between local excitation and surround inhibition is required. Here we explore the spatiotemporal aspects of cortical depolarization and hyperpolarization of rats anesthetized with urethane. New voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs) were used for high-resolution real-time visualization of the cortical responses to whisker deflections and cutaneous stimulations of the whisker pad. These advances facilitated imaging of ongoing activity and evoked responses even without signal averaging. We found that the motion of a single whisker evoked a cortical response exhibiting either one or three phases. During a triphasic response, there was first a cortical depolarization in a small cortical region the size of a single cortical barrel. Subsequently, this depolarization increased and spread laterally in an oval manner, preferentially along rows of the barrel field. During the second phase, the amplitude of the evoked response declined rapidly, presumably because of recurrent inhibition. Subsequently, the third phase exhibiting a depolarization rebound was observed and clear, and approximately 16 Hz oscillations were detected. Stimulus conditions revealing a net surround hyperpolarization during the second phase were also found. By using new, improved VSD, the present findings shed new light on the spatial parameters of the intricate spatiotemporal cortical interplay of inhibition and excitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03100.2003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar characteristic modulation epochs were observed in animals where recordings were done in a neighboring barrel column in the same or even a different row (n = 3), indicating that lateral cross-columnar inhibition is unlikely the source.

    “However, similar characteristic modulation epochs were observed in animals where recordings were done in a neighboring barrel column in the same or even a different row (n = 3, Fig. 5D), exhibits a striking similarity indicating that lateral cross-columnar inhibition (55) is unlikely the source.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Grinvald A, Shoham D, Shmuel A, Glaser DE, Vanzetta I, Shtoyerman E, Slovin H, Sterkin A, Wijnbergen C, Hildesheim R, Arieli A (1999) In- vivo optical imaging of cortical architecture and dynamics. In: Modern techniques in neuroscience research (Windhorst U, Johansson H, eds), pp 893-969. Heidelberg: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derdikman, D., Hildesheim, R., Ahissar, E., Arieli, A., & Grinvald, A.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-04-15
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
3100-3105
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2120250935
Cited by
177
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
surround inhibition, somatosensory cortex, barrel cortex, cortical depolarization, whisker deflection, voltage-sensitive dyes, cortical oscillations, recurrent inhibition, spatiotemporal dynamics, cortical evoked potentials
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Diagnostic Imaging, Coloring Agents, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Fluorescence, Male, Models, Neurological, Neural Inhibition, Physical Stimulation, Reaction Time, Somatosensory Cortex, Vibrissae, Normal Distribution, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review