The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weakened Center-Surround Interactions in Visual Motion Processing in Schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Schizophrenia is often accompanied by a range of visual perception deficits, with many involving impairments in motion perception. The presence of perceptual abnormalities may impair neural processes that depend on normal visual analysis, which in turn may affect overall functioning in dynamic visual environments. Here, we examine the integrity of suppressive center-surround mechanisms in motion perception of schizophrenic patients. Center-surround suppression has been implicated in a range of visual functions, including figure-ground segregation and pursuit eye movements, visual functions that are impaired in schizophrenia. In control subjects, evidence of center-surround suppression is found in a reduced ability to perceive motion of a high-contrast stimulus as its size increases. This counterintuitive finding is likely a perceptual correlate of center-surround mechanisms in cortical area MT. We now show that schizophrenic patients exhibit abnormally weak center-surround suppression in motion, an abnormality that is most pronounced in patients with severe negative symptoms. Interestingly, patients with the weakest surround suppression outperformed control subjects in motion discriminations of large high-contrast stimuli. This enhanced motion perception of large high-contrast stimuli is consistent with an MT abnormality in schizophrenia and has a potential to disrupt smooth pursuit eye movements and other visual functions that depend on unimpaired center-surround interactions in motion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Dakin's findings were notably replicated using the same type of context-based illusion paradigms (Uhlhaas et al., 2004; Tadin et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2008)”
From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Tadin et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“Whereas center-surround antagonism in control subjects resulted in reduced ability to perceive motion of a high-contrast stimulus as its size increased, patients with schizophrenia did not show this reduction in motion perception.”
From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Importantly, like Dakin et al. (27), these authors find that a disruptive context has less influence on patients than on controls, arguing against nonspecific deficits or lack of attention as an underlying cause of differences.”
From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“A recent study (33) provides evidence for decreased gain control in schizophrenia in a motion discrimination task.”
From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Whereas center-surround antagonism in control subjects resulted in reduced ability to perceive motion of a high-contrast stimulus as its size increased, patients with schizophrenia did not show this reduction in motion perception.”
From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Whereas gain control is involved in motion deficits (e.g., 33)”
From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 20,012
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies
Pelli, D. G. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00366 · Cited by 11,110
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202828 · Cited by 2,398
The SPQ: A Scale for the Assessment of Schizotypal Personality Based on DSM-III-R Criteria
Raine, A. (1991) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/17.4.555 · Cited by 2,164
Negative v Positive Schizophrenia
Andreasen, N. C. (1982) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290070025006 · Cited by 2,008
Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589 · cited 2×
“More specifically, deciding whether an object is moving in one of two possible directions can be conceptualized as a process involving accumulation of sensory evidence over time (Gold and Shadlen, 2000; Roitman and Shadlen, 2002).”
BackgroundSTRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF VISUAL AREA MT
Born, R. T., & Bradley, D. C. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131052 · Cited by 1,023 · cited 2×
“One functional role of MT is representation of both object and background motion (Born and Bradley, 2005).”
BackgroundCortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction
Salzman, C. D., Britten, K. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346174a0 · Cited by 881 · cited 2×
“, 2003a), which is a task that is also linked with MT neurons (Salzman et al., 1990).”
BackgroundA direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5
Rees, G. E., Friston, K. J., & Koch, C. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/76673 · Cited by 654
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.2466/PR0.10.3.799-812 · DOI · Paper page
- Spreen O Strauss E (1998) A compendium of neuropsychological tests (Oxford UP, New York).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Normalization as a canonical neural computation
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3136 · Cited by 1,906
Robertson, C. E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.112 · Cited by 1,157
Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia
Butler, P. D., Silverstein, S. M., & Dakin, S. C. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.023 · Cited by 472
Yoon, J. H., Maddock, R. J., Rokem, A., Silver, M. A., Minzenberg, M. J., Ragland, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6158-09.2010 · Cited by 408
Foss‐Feig, J. H., Adkinson, B. D., Ji, J. L., Yang, G., Srihari, V. H., McPartland, J. C., Krystal, J. H., Murray, J. D., & Anticevic, A. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.03.005 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Tadin, D., Kim, J., Doop, M. L., Gibson, C., Lappin, J. S., Blake, R., & Park, S.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 11403-11412
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6674537
- OpenAlex
- W2039490356
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- National Institutes of Health (5r29mh058406-05, EY08126)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH58406, R01MH073028, MH073028)
- National Eye Institute (EY07760, EY08126, R03EY015558, R01EY007760, EY015558, P30EY008126)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, visual motion perception, surround suppression, negative symptoms, smooth pursuit eye movements, figure-ground segregation, visual perception deficits
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Schizophrenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
