The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Memory Retrieval That Suggest Nontraditional Processing Roles for Multiple Distinct Regions within Posterior Parietal Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Current theories of posterior parietal cortex (PPC) function emphasize space-based attention and motor intention. Imaging studies of long-term memory have demonstrated PPC activation during successful memory retrieval. Here, we explored the relationship between memory processes and classical notions of PPC function. Study 1 investigated old-new recognition using picture and sound stimuli to test whether PPC memory effects were dependent on visuospatial attention. A region lateral to the intraparietal sulcus [inferior parietal lobule complex (IPLC)] and two regions in the medial PPC [precuneus complex (PCC) and posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex (pC/Rsp)] showed strong retrieval success effects for both picture and sound stimuli. Study 2 explored a recognition task with varied response contingencies to investigate whether these retrieval success effects are dependent on motor intentions. In one condition, subjects responded to both old and new items. In two other conditions, subjects responded only to old or only to new items. IPLC, PCC, and pC/Rsp continued to show retrieval success effects with similar magnitudes for all response contingencies, including a condition in which no responses were made to old items. In a third study, IPLC and PCC activity was modulated at retrieval based on levels of processing at study, suggesting sensitivity to memory demands. These studies demonstrate that retrieval success effects in lateral and medial PPC regions are not affected by manipulations predicted by classical theories of PPC function but can be modulated by memory-related manipulations. PPC regions thus have prominent response properties associated with memory, which may arise through interactions with medial temporal cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 · Cited by 3,840
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22268 · Cited by 1,721
SPACE AND ATTENTION IN PARIETAL CORTEX
Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.319 · Cited by 1,710
Intentional Maps in Posterior Parietal Cortex
Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142922 · Cited by 1,294 · cited 2×
“Single-unit recordings from PPC in monkeys are consistent with a role in space-based attention and motor planning (Colby and Goldberg, 1999; Andersen and Buneo, 2002).”
BackgroundDiscrimination between Alzheimer dementia and controls by automated analysis of multicenter FDG PET
Herholz, K., Salmon, E., Perani, D., Baron, J.-C., Holthoff, V., Frölich, L., Schönknecht, P., Ito, K., Mielke, R., & Kalbe, E. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1208 · Cited by 832
Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention
Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077395 · Cited by 821
Mapping of Contralateral Space in Retinotopic Coordinates by a Parietal Cortical Area in Humans
Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Martinez, A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063695 · Cited by 682 · cited 2×
“One landmark in PPC is monkey LIP (Lewis and Van Essen, 2000) and its putative homolog in humans (Culham and Kanwisher, 2001; Sereno et al., 2001).”
The cognitive neuroscience of remembering
Buckner, R. L., & Wheeler, M. E. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090048 · Cited by 462
Self-citationFunctional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing
Wheeler, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.001 · Cited by 434
Self-citation
Cited by
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 · Cited by 3,889
Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
Self-citationBuckner, R. L., Snyder, A. Z., Shannon, B. J., LaRossa, G., Sachs, R., Fotenos, A. F., Sheline, Y. I., Klunk, W. E., Mathis, C. A., Morris, J. C., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2177-05.2005 · Cited by 2,140
Self-citationParietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval
Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,571
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shannon, B. J., & Buckner, R. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-11-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 10084-10092
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1988527674
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Memory Retrieval That Suggest Nontraditional Processing Roles for Multiple Distinct Regions within Posterior Parietal Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2625-04.2004
- The paper
- Shannon, B. J., & Buckner, R. L. (2004). Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Memory Retrieval That Suggest Nontraditional Processing Roles for Multiple Distinct Regions within Posterior Parietal Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2625-04.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.