Cited by 462Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The cognitive neuroscience of remembering

Buckner, Randy L., Wheeler, Mark E.·2001·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35090048

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckner, R. L., & Wheeler, M. E.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
624-634
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W1582595570
Cited by
462
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
remembering, memory retrieval, medial temporal lobe, neocortex, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, memory reinstatement, memory reconstruction, cognitive neuroscience of memory
MeSH terms
Auditory Cortex, Brain Mapping, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Memory, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review