Cited by 56Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Control over Stress, But Not Stress Per Se Increases Prefrontal Cortical Pyramidal Neuron Excitability

Open access
Varela, Juan A., Wang, Jungang, Christianson, John P., Maier, Steven F., Cooper, Donald C.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Behavioral control over a stressful event reduces the negative consequences of not only that event, but also future stressful events. Plasticity in the prelimbic (PL) medial prefrontal cortex is critical to this process, but the nature of the changes induced is unknown. We used patch-clamp recording to measure the intrinsic excitability of PL pyramidal neurons in acute slices from rats exposed to either escapable stress (ES), for which rats had behavioral control over tail-shock termination, or inescapable stress (IS) without control. Shortly after exposure (2 h) to tail-shock stress, neurons in the ES group had larger action potential (AP) amplitude and faster AP rise rate, larger postspike afterdepolarization, and reduced membrane time constant. No significant effects of IS were observed. We developed a conductance-based computer model using the simulation tool NEURON. The computer model simulated the observed changes in the ES group with increases in Na+conductance (g Na) and T-type Ca 2+conductance (g Ca T). The empirical and computational results indicate that behavioral control over stress, but not stress itself, increases PL pyramidal neuron excitability by increasing intrinsic membrane excitability. It is proposed that plasticity of excitability is important to the behavioral effects of controllable stressor exposure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2669-12.2012

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct electrophysiological measurement indicates escapable shock but not inescapable shock increases excitability of projecting prelimbic neurons.

    “Direct electrophysiological measurement of projecting prelimbic neurons indicates that escapable shock, but not inescapable shock increases their excitability (Varela, Wang, Christianson, Maier, & Cooper, 2012).”

    From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Varela, Wang, Christianson, Maier, & Cooper, 2012

  • V1a receptor binding is not evident in adult male rat insula.

    “V1a receptor binding is not evident in adult male rat insula61.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varela, J. A., Wang, J., Christianson, J. P., Maier, S. F., & Cooper, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-09-12
Volume
32
Issue
37
Pages
12848-12853
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2064336860
Cited by
56
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH093412, MH050479, R00MH093412, MH093412, R37MH050479, R01MH050479)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA024040, R01DA024040, K01DA017750)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
inescapable stress, action potential amplitude, afterdepolarizations, membrane time constant, sodium conductance, conductance-based neuron model, stress-induced plasticity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Escape Reaction, Male, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review