Cited by 292Stress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in coping and resilience

Open access
Maier, Steven F., Watkins, Linda R.·2010·Brain Research

Abstract

The degree of behavioral control that an organism has over an aversive event is well known to modulate the behavioral and neurochemical consequences of exposure to the event. Here we review recent research that suggests that the experience of control over a potent stressor alters how the organism responds to future aversive events as well as to the stressor being controlled. More specifically, subjects that have experienced control show blunted behavioral and neurochemical responses to subsequent stressors occurring days to months later. Indeed, these subjects respond as if a later uncontrollable stressor is actually controllable. Further, we review research indicating that the stress resistance induced by control depends on control-induced activation of ventral medial prefrontal cortical (vmPFC) inhibitory control over brainstem and limbic structures. Furthermore, there appears to be plasticity in these circuits such that the experience of control alters the vmPFC in such a way that later uncontrollable stressors now activate the vmPFC circuitry, leading to inhibition of stress-responsive limbic and brainstem structures, i.e., stressor resistance. This controllability-induced proactive stressor resistance generalizes across very different stressors and may be involved in determining individual difference in reactions to traumatic events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.039

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • vmPFC inactivation abolishes all these benefits of control without affecting the learning of escape responses per se.

    “vmPFC inactivation abolishes all these benefits of control without affecting the learning of escape responses per se.”
  • Control over shock speeds subsequent escape learning, slows subsequent fear conditioning, reduces threat-related serotonin responses in the dorsal raphe to novel contexts, and buffers animals against later adverse effects of inescapable shock.

    “Control speeds subsequent escape learning [40] and slows subsequent fear conditioning [41], reduces threat-related serotonin responses in the dorsal raphe to novel contexts [40], and buffers the animals against later adverse effects of inescapable shock [42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maier, S. F., & Watkins, L. R.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Maier, Steven F.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
1355
Pages
52-60
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999655743
Cited by
292
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH50479)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, stress resilience, perceived control, coping, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, inhibitory control, brainstem, limbic system, neuroplasticity, individual differences, trauma, aversive events
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Brain Stem, Humans, Limbic System, Neural Inhibition, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Stress, Psychological, Prefrontal Cortex, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review