Cited by 58Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Role of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex in mediating behavioral control-induced reduction of later conditioned fear

Open access
Baratta, Michael V., Lucero, Thomas R., Amat, Jose, Watkins, Linda R., Maier, Steven F.·2008·Learning & Memory

Abstract

A prior experience of behavioral control over a stressor interferes with subsequent Pavlovian fear conditioning, and this effect is dependent on the activation of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFCv) at the time of the initial experience with control. It is unknown whether mPFCv activity is necessary during fear learning and/or testing for this interference to occur. One week following controllable stress, the infralimbic cortex (IL) was temporarily inactivated either before fear learning or later testing. Inactivation of the IL before the test for conditioned fear, but not before conditioning, blocked the fear reducing effects of prior controllable stress. This suggests that the experience with control interferes with the expression of fear behavior and not the learning of the association, and that the mPFCv is needed to regulate conditioned fear behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.800308

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of prior control on fear conditioning depend on vmPFC.

    “Moreover, these effects of prior control depended on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (Baratta, Lucero, Amat, Watkins, & Maier, 2008)”

    From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Baratta, Lucero, Amat, Watkins, & Maier, 2008

  • Previous history with escapable shock results in a lasting reduction of the conditioned response, and this effect is eliminated with IL inactivation.

    “Mirroring these findings, studies have shown that previous history with escapable shock results in a lasting reduction of the conditioned response, and this effect is eliminated with IL inactivation [113].”
  • vmPFC inactivation abolishes all these benefits of control without affecting the learning of escape responses per se.

    “vmPFC inactivation abolishes all these benefits of control without affecting the learning of escape responses per se.”
  • Control over shock speeds subsequent escape learning, slows subsequent fear conditioning, reduces threat-related serotonin responses in the dorsal raphe to novel contexts, and buffers animals against later adverse effects of inescapable shock.

    “Control speeds subsequent escape learning [40] and slows subsequent fear conditioning [41], reduces threat-related serotonin responses in the dorsal raphe to novel contexts [40], and buffers the animals against later adverse effects of inescapable shock [42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baratta, M. V., Lucero, T. R., Amat, J., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2008-01-29
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
84-87
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2097388044
Cited by
58
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH075213, R01MH050479)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
ventromedial prefrontal cortex, infralimbic cortex, fear conditioning, behavioral control, fear expression, fear learning, neural inactivation
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Electroshock, Fear, Limbic System, Male, Stress, Physiological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review