The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Searching for the Mismatch Negativity in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Monkey: Deviance Detection or Stimulus Specific Adaptation?
Open accessAbstract
The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a preattentive component of the auditory event-related potential that is elicited by a change in a repetitive acoustic pattern. While MMN has been extensively used in human electrophysiological studies of auditory processing, the neural mechanisms and brain regions underlying its generation remain unclear. We investigate possible homologs of the MMN in macaque primary auditory cortex (A1) using a frequency oddball paradigm in which rare “deviant” tones are randomly interspersed among frequent “standard” tones. Standards and deviants had frequencies equal to the best frequency (BF) of the recorded neural population or to a frequency that evoked a response half the amplitude of the BF response. Early and later field potentials, current source density components, multiunit activity, and induced high-gamma band responses were larger when elicited by deviants than by standards of the same frequency. Laminar analysis indicated that differences between deviant and standard responses were more prominent in later activity, thus suggesting cortical amplification of initial responses driven by thalamocortical inputs. However, unlike the human MMN, larger deviant responses were characterized by the enhancement of “obligatory” responses rather than the introduction of new components. Furthermore, a control condition wherein deviants were interspersed among many tones of variable frequency replicated the larger responses to deviants under the oddball condition. Results suggest that differential responses under the oddball condition in macaque A1 reflect stimulus-specific adaptation rather than deviance detection per se. We conclude that neural mechanisms of deviance detection likely reside in cortical areas outside of A1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adaptation enables high sensitivity to small changes in stimulus features over a large range of intensities, and is found across sensory systems5,17,26,105,210–216.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [212]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons
Ulanovsky, N., Las, L., & Nelken, I. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1032 · Cited by 1,049
Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates
Kaas, J. H., & Hackett, T. A. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11793 · Cited by 1,013
Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex
Lakatos, P., Chen, C.-M., O'Connell, M. N., Mills, A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.011 · Cited by 961
Induced γ-Band Activity during the Delay of a Visual Short-Term Memory Task in Humans
Tallon‐Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Peronnet, F., & Pernier, J. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-11-04244.1998 · Cited by 900
Giard, M., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., & Bouchet, P. (1990) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb03184.x · Cited by 871
Representation of the cochlear partition on the superior temporal plane of the macaque monkey
Merzenich, M. M., & Brugge, J. F. (1973) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(73)90731-2 · Cited by 765
Alho, K. (1995) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199502000-00004 · Cited by 705
Nicholson, C., & Freeman, J. A. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.2.356 · Cited by 699
Memory‐based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence
Näätänen, R., Jacobsen, T., & Winkler, I. (2005) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00256.x · Cited by 657
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Vaughan, 1988, The neural basis of event-related potentials, Vol 3, 45
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurons along the auditory pathway exhibit a hierarchical organization of prediction error
Parras, G. G., Nieto-Diego, J., Carbajal, G. V., Valdés-Baizabal, C., Escera, C., & Malmierca, M. S. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02038-6 · Cited by 344
Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex
Ferguson, K. A., & Cardin, J. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0253-y · Cited by 327
Disruption of hierarchical predictive coding during sleep
Strauss, M., Sitt, J. D., King, J.-R., Elbaz, M., Azizi, L., Buiatti, M., Naccache, L., van Wassenhove, V., & Dehaene, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1501026112 · Cited by 244
Moving Sensory Adaptation beyond Suppressive Effects in Single Neurons
Solomon, S. G., & Kohn, A. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.001 · Cited by 247
Carbajal, G. V., & Malmierca, M. S. (2018) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216518784822 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishman, Y. I., & Steinschneider, M.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-11-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 15747-15758
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3641775
- OpenAlex
- W2019142244
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DC00657)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC000657)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- mismatch negativity, primary auditory cortex, macaque, deviance detection, stimulus-specific adaptation, auditory event-related potentials, current source density, multi-unit activity, thalamocortical input, auditory processing
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Attention, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Macaca fascicularis, Male, Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
