Cited by 74Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Impaired Critical Period Plasticity in Primary Auditory Cortex of Fragile X Model Mice

Open access
Kim, Heesoo, Gibboni, Robert, Kirkhart, Colleen, Bao, Shaowen·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome, the most common form of heritable mental retardation, is a developmental disorder with known effects within sensory systems. Altered developmental plasticity has been reported in the visual and somatosensory systems in Fmr1 knock-out (KO) mice. Behavioral studies have revealed maladaptive auditory responses in fragile X syndrome patients and Fmr1 KO mice, suggesting that adaptive plasticity may also be impaired in the auditory system. Here we show that, whereas tonotopic frequency representation develops normally in Fmr1 KO mice, developmental plasticity in primary auditory cortex is grossly impaired. This deficit can be rescued by pharmacological blockade of mGluR5 receptors. These results support the mGluR hypothesis of fragile X mental retardation and suggest that deficient developmental plasticity may contribute to maladaptive auditory processing in fragile X syndrome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3246-12.2013

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Chen L, Toth M (2001) Fragile X mice develop sensory hyperreactivity to auditory stimuli. Neuroscience 103:1043-1050. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chuang SC, Zhao W, Bauchwitz R, Yan Q, Bianchi R, Wong RK (2005) Prolonged epileptiform discharges induced by altered group I metabo- tropic glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic responses in hippocampal slices of a fragile X mouse model. J Neurosci 25:8048 -8055. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  3. Curia G, Papouin T, Se ´gue ´la P, Avoli M (2009) Downregulation of tonic GABAergic inhibition in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Cereb Cortex 19:1515-1520. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  4. Desai NS, Casimiro TM, Gruber SM, Vanderklish PW (2006) Early postna- tal plasticity in neocortex of Fmr1 knock-out mice. J Neurophysiol 96: 1734 -1745. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  5. de Villers-Sidani E, Chang EF, Bao S, Merzenich MM (2007) Critical period window for spectral tuning defined in the primary auditory cortex (A1) in the rat. J Neurosci 27:180 -189. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  6. de Vrij FM, Levenga J, van der Linde HC, Koekkoek SK, De Zeeuw CI, Nelson DL, Oostra BA, Willemsen R (2008) Rescue of behavioral phenotype and neuronal protrusion morphology in Fmr1 KO mice. Neurobiol Dis 31:127-132. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  7. Do ¨len G, Bear MF (2008) Role for metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) in the pathogenesis of fragile X syndrome. J Physiol 586:1503- 1508. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  8. Do ¨len G, Osterweil E, Rao BS, Smith GB, Auerbach BD, Chattarji S, Bear MF (2007) Correction of fragile X syndrome in mice. Neuron 56:955-962. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dorrn AL, Yuan K, Barker AJ, Schreiner CE, Froemke RC (2010) Develop- mental sensory experience balances cortical excitation and inhibition. Nature 465:932-936. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  10. Finestack LH, Richmond EK, Abbeduto L (2009) Language development in individuals with fragile X syndrome. Top Lang Disord 29:133-148. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  11. Han YK, Ko ¨ver H, Insanally MN, Semerdjian JH, Bao S (2007) Early expe- rience impairs perceptual discrimination. Nat Neurosci 10:1191-1197. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  12. Hanson DM, Jackson AW 3rd, Hagerman RJ (1986) Speech disturbances (cluttering) in mildly impaired males with the Martin-Bell/fragile X syn- drome. Am J Med Genet 23:195-206. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  13. Harlow EG, Till SM, Russell TA, Wijetunge LS, Kind P, Contractor A (2010) Critical period plasticity is disrupted in the barrel cortex of FMR1 knock- out mice. Neuron 65:385-398. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hensch TK (2004) Critical period regulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:549 - 579. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  15. Insanally MN, Ko ¨ver H, Kim H, Bao S (2009) Feature-dependent sensitive periods in the development of complex sound representation. J Neurosci 29:5456 -5462. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  16. Insanally MN, Albanna BF, Bao S (2010) Pulsed noise experience disrupts complex sound representations. J Neurophysiol 103:2611-2617. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  17. Jin P, Warren ST (2003) New insights into fragile X syndrome: from mole- cules to neurobehaviors. Trends Biochem Sci 28:152-158. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  18. Kim H, Bao S (2009) Selective increase in representations of sounds re- peated at an ethological rate. J Neurosci 29:5163-5169. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  19. LeBlanc JJ, Fagiolini M (2011) Autism: A "critical period" disorder? Neural Plast 2011:921680. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  20. Li J, Pelletier MR, Perez Velazquez JL, Carlen PL (2002) Reduced cortical synaptic plasticity and GluR1 expression associated with fragile X mental retardation protein deficiency. Mol Cell Neurosci 19:138 -151. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  21. McBride SM, Choi CH, Wang Y, Liebelt D, Braunstein E, Ferreiro D, Sehgal A, Siwicki KK, Dockendorff TC, Nguyen HT, McDonald TV, Jongens TA (2005) Pharmacological rescue of synaptic plasticity, courtship behavior, and mushroom body defects in a Drosophila model of fragile X syndrome. Neuron 45:753-764. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  22. Meredith RM, Holmgren CD, Weidum M, Burnashev N, Mansvelder HD (2007) Increased threshold for spike-timing-dependent plasticity is caused by unreliable calcium signaling in mice lacking fragile X gene FMR1. Neuron 54:627-638. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  23. Meredith RM, de Jong R, Mansvelder HD (2011) Functional rescue of ex- citatory synaptic transmission in the developing hippocampus in Fmr1-KO mouse. Neurobiol Dis 41:104 -110. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  24. Michalon A, Sidorov M, Ballard TM, Ozmen L, Spooren W, Wettstein JG, Jaeschke G, Bear MF, Lindemann L (2012) Chronic pharmacological mGlu5 inhibition corrects fragile X in adult mice. Neuron 74:49 -56. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  25. Miller LJ, McIntosh DN, McGrath J, Shyu V, Lampe M, Taylor AK, Tassone F, Neitzel K, Stackhouse T, Hagerman RJ (1999) Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with fragile X syndrome: a preliminary report. Am J Med Genet 83:268 -279. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  26. Miyakawa A, Gibboni R, Bao S (2013) Repeated exposure to a tone tran- siently alters spectral tuning bandwidth of neurons in the central nucleus of inferior colliculus in juvenile rats. Neuroscience 230:114 -120. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  27. Nielsen DM, Derber WJ, McClellan DA, Crnic LS (2002) Alterations in the auditory startle response in Fmr1 targeted mutant mouse models of frag- ile X syndrome. Brain Res 927:8 -17. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  28. O'Connor LH, Erway LC, Vogler CA, Sly WS, Nicholes A, Grubb J, Holmberg SW, Levy B, Sands MS (1998) Enzyme replacement therapy for murine mucopolysaccharidosis type VII leads to improvements in behavior and auditory function. J Clin Invest 101:1394 -1400. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  29. Oliver DL, Izquierdo MA, Malmierca MS (2011) Persistent effects of early augmented acoustic environment on the auditory brainstem. Neurosci- ence 184:75-87. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  30. Popescu MV, Polley DB (2010) Monaural deprivation disrupts develop- ment of binaural selectivity in auditory midbrain and cortex. Neuron 65:718 -731. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  31. Selby L, Zhang C, Sun QQ (2007) Major defects in neocortical GABAergic inhibitory circuits in mice lacking the fragile X mental retardation pro- tein. Neurosci Lett 412:227-232. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  32. Soden ME, Chen L (2010) Fragile X protein FMRP is required for homeo- static plasticity and regulation of synaptic strength by retinoic acid. J Neu- rosci 30:16910 -16921. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  33. Su T, Fan HX, Jiang T, Sun WW, Den WY, Gao MM, Chen SQ, Zhao QH, Yi YH (2011) Early continuous inhibition of group 1 mGlu signaling par- tially rescues dendritic spine abnormalities in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model for fragile X syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 215:291-300. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  34. Thomas AM, Bui N, Perkins JR, Yuva-Paylor LA, Paylor R (2012) Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists alter select behaviors in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 219: 47-58. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  35. Tsiouris JA, Brown WT (2004) Neuropsychiatric symptoms of fragile X syn- drome: pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy. CNS Drugs 18:687-703. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  36. Wang XF, Daw NW (2003) Long term potentiation varies with layer in rat visual cortex. Brain Res 989:26 -34. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  37. Wilson BM, Cox CL (2007) Absence of metabotropic glutamate receptor- mediated plasticity in the neocortex of fragile X mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:2454 -2459. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  38. Zhang LI, Bao S, Merzenich MM (2001) Persistent and specific influences of early acoustic environments on primary auditory cortex. Nat Neurosci 4:1123-1130. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  39. Zhao MG, Toyoda H, Ko SW, Ding HK, Wu LJ, Zhuo M (2005) Deficits in trace fear memory and long-term potentiation in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome. J Neurosci 25:7385-7392. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H., Gibboni, R., Kirkhart, C., & Bao, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-10-02
Volume
33
Issue
40
Pages
15686-15692
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2089184392
Cited by
74
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC009259, R01DC009259)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, Fmr1 knockout mice, primary auditory cortex, critical period plasticity, developmental plasticity, tonotopic organization, auditory processing, intellectual disability
MeSH terms
Animals, Auditory Cortex, Critical Period, Psychological, Disease Models, Animal, Fragile X Syndrome, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Pyridines, Mice, Knockout, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Mice, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1, Receptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review