The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internal and External Influences on the Rate of Sensory Evidence Accumulation in the Human Brain
Open accessAbstract
We frequently need to make timely decisions based on sensory evidence that is weak, ambiguous, or noisy resulting from conditions in the external environment (e.g., a cluttered visual scene) or within the brain itself (e.g., inattention, neural noise). Here we examine how externally and internally driven variations in the quality of sensory evidence affect the build-to-threshold dynamics of a supramodal “decision variable” signal and, hence, the timing and accuracy of decision reports in humans. Observers performed a continuous-monitoring version of the prototypical two-alternative dot-motion discrimination task, which is known to strongly benefit from sequential sampling and temporal accumulation of evidence. A centroparietal positive potential (CPP), which we previously established as a supramodal decision signal based on its invariance to motor or sensory parameters, exhibited two key identifying properties associated with the “decision variable” long described in sequential sampling models: (1) its buildup rate systematically scaled with sensory evidence strength across four levels of motion coherence, consistent with temporal integration; and (2) its amplitude reached a stereotyped level at the moment of perceptual report executions, consistent with a boundary-crossing stopping criterion. The buildup rate of the CPP also strongly predicted reaction time within coherence levels (i.e., independent of physical evidence strength), and this endogenous variation was linked with attentional fluctuations indexed by the level of parieto-occipital α-band activity preceding target onset. In tandem with the CPP, build-to-threshold dynamics were also observed in an effector-selective motor preparation signal; however, the buildup of this motor-specific process significantly lagged that of the supramodal process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This suggests that the P3 may encode motivationally significant events, which, in the present study, were the saliently colored/ethnic Black hands during SRC processing, potentially contributing to a dynamic decision process of linking perception to action31,42–45”
From Event-related potentials of automatic imitation are modulated by ethnicity during stimulus processing, but not during motor execution (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It has been suggested that the role of the P3 component lies in bridging stimulus perception and response execution31,44 in a dynamically evolving decision process, linking sensory encoding of stimulus perception to the preparation of action42,43,45, and/or response control44.”
From Event-related potentials of automatic imitation are modulated by ethnicity during stimulus processing, but not during motor execution (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 · Cited by 7,919
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty
Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 · Cited by 3,061
The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 · Cited by 3,059
The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance
Britten, K., Shadlen, M., Newsome, W., & Movshon, J. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-12-04745.1992 · Cited by 1,958
On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity
Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201990559 · Cited by 1,766
Neural Basis of a Perceptual Decision in the Parietal Cortex (Area LIP) of the Rhesus Monkey
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1916 · Cited by 1,755
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 455
Steering is initiated based on error accumulation.
Goodridge, C. M., Mole, C. D., Billington, J., Markkula, G. M., & Wilkie, R. M. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000970 · Cited by 4
Tourism Service Management and Senior Foreign Travelers’s Behavior in Thailand
Wongcharoenkul, S., & Suntrayuth, S. (2023) · Rajabhat Chiang Mai Research Journal · doi:10.57260/rcmrj.2023.260674 · Cited by 3
García-Lázaro, H. G., & Teng, S. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0122-24.2024 · Cited by 3
“For correct trials, signi fi cance was prolonged until the end of the epoch and beyond in the centroparietal cluster, consistent with perceptual decision-making process indexed by the centroparietal potential visible in these electrodes (Kelly and O ’ Connell, 2013; Tagliabue et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodThe Impact of Latency Jitter on the Interpretation of P300 in the Assessment of Cognitive Function
Yu, X. (2016) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 3
Nelli, S., Itthipuripat, S., Rungratsameetaweemana, N., & Serences, J. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/420430 · Cited by 2
“The CPP data were analyzed at centro-parietal electrode (CPz) based on previously published studies(S. Itthipuripat, Ester, Deering, & Serences, 2014; S Itthipuripat, Cha, Rangsipat, & Serences, 2015; Kelly & O’Connell, 2013; O’Connell et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialReward certainty and preference bias selectively shape voluntary decisionsPreprint
Zajkowski, W. K., Krzemiński, D., Barone, J., Evans, L. H., & Zhang, J. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/832311 · Cited by 3
A common neural currency account for social and non-social decisionsPreprint
Arabadzhiyska, D. H., Garrod, O., Fouragnan, E. F., Luca, E. D., Schyns, P. G., & Philiastides, M. G. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.18.464762 · Cited by 3
“These similarities are suggestive of common neural generators across the two contexts, consistent with those reported previously in the perceptual domain (e.g. Herding et al., 2019; Kelly and O’Connell, 2013; Philiastides, Heekeren, and Sajda, 2014).”
ResultGlobal motion evoked potentials in autistic and dyslexic children: a cross-syndrome approachPreprint
Toffoli, L., Scerif, G., Snowling, M. J., Norcia, A. M., & Manning, C. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2cq4b · Cited by 3
A unified neural account of contextual and individual differences in altruismPreprint
Hu, J., Konovalov, A., & Ruff, C. C. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.29.493933 · Cited by 3
Metacognitive Introspection Alters the Dynamics of Pre-Decisional Neural Evidence AccumulationPreprint
Dou, W., Afrakhteh, S., & Samaha, J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.26.625501 · Cited by 5
Neuropixels reveal structure-function relationships in monkey V1 in vivoPreprint
Carr, N., Zhu, S., Chen, X., Lee, E., Perliss, A., Moore, T., & Chandrasekaran, C. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.14.653875 · Cited by 3
“…in the Kv3 family) that lead to rapid repolar-204 ization and narrow-spiking waveforms are more prevalent in layers 4A, 4B, and 4C than in other layers of V1 (13, 43), and although commonly associated with fast-spiking PV cells, are found in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (12, 44, 45).”
Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure
Walsh, K. S., McGovern, D. P., Dully, J., Kelly, S. P., & O’Connell, R. G. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.91135.3 · Cited by 2
Self-citationVisser, Y. F., Medendorp, W. P., & Selen, L. P. J. (2025) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.70237 · Cited by 2
“Future studies might mitigate this problem by presenting continuous visual stimulation which contains shifts in direction, as in Kelly and O'Connell (2013).”
Characterizing early auditory deficits in schizophrenia using drift-diffusion modeling
Dondé, C., Pereira, M., Nalborczyk, L., Roux, P., Faivre, N., & Brunelin, J. (2025) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2025.07.024 · Cited by 2
Augmentation of frontoparietal gamma-band phase coupling enhances human altruistic behavior
Hu, J., Moisa, M., & Ruff, C. C. (2026) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003602 · Cited by 2
“…is consistent with findings that frontal EEG responses to other-interest are correlated with individuals’ altruistic preferences [18], and with the well-documented role of parietal regions in evidence accumulation processes underlying nonsocial [32,56] and social decision-making [18,27,28,57–59].”
Neuropixels reveal laminar microcircuit organization in monkey V1 in vivo
Carr, N., Zhu, S., Chen, X., Lee, E., Perliss, A., Moore, T., & Chandrasekaran, C. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2521556123 · Cited by 2
“These Kv3 positive, excitatory neurons are largely restricted to layers 4b and 4c (14, 53).”
Fong, L. C., Garrett, P. M., Smith, P. L., Hester, R., Bode, S., & Feuerriegel, D. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1184 · Cited by 4
“We mitigated these issues by applying deconvolution (RIDE; Ouyang et al., 2015) to reduce stimulus-related overlap in our response-locked data, and by using CSD transformations to enhance spatial precision of EEG signals (Feuerriegel et al., 2022; Kelly and O’Connell, 2013).”
InfluentialPatterns of electrical brain activation in response to socially-disputed perceptual judgments
Zanesco, J., Tipura, E., Clément, F., & Pegna, A. J. (2019) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0000000000001343 · Cited by 2
Perceived Audio-Visual Simultaneity Is Recalibrated by the Visual Intensity of the Preceding Trial
Horsfall, R., Harrison, N., Meyer, G. F., & Wuerger, S. M. (2024) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-bja10121 · Cited by 2
Hoffmann, A. H., & Crevecoeur, F. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0262-24.2024 · Cited by 2
“In line with such bidirectional in fl uences between decision-making and movement control, Kelly and O ’ Connell (2013) showed that a centroparietal positivity component in an EEG study scaled both with coherence of a random dot motion stimulus as well as with the reaction time of the subsequent…”
Gaál, Z. A., Nagy, B., Czigler, I., Csizmadia, P., Petró, B., & Kojouharova, P. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307351 · Cited by 3
Queirazza, F., & Philiastides, M. G. (2025) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-025-00165-3 · Cited by 2
Decomposing Economic Choices with Drift-Diffusion Models
Krajbich, I. M., Fernandez, K., & Yang, X. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02925-6_9 · Cited by 2
Phasic and tonic arousal distinctly shape human decision bias
Nuiten, S. A., de Gee, J. W., Zantvoord, J. B., Sterzer, P., Fahrenfort, J. J., & van Gaal, S. (2026) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-026-09776-8 · Cited by 3
“…with long stimulus durations that encourage participants to accumulate evidence (e.g., random dot motion kinematogram task with >1 s of stimulation 57 ), beha-vioralandneuralmarkersofevidenceaccumulationhavealsobeenobserved duringtaskswithstimulusdurations~200 ms(asinthecurrentexperiment) and…”
Neural dynamics of cue reliability in perceptual decisions
Mancuso, G., & Plomp, G. (2020) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.20.8.23 · Cited by 2
“…such decision processes are reflected over parietal areas and resemble a classic target-detection component, at 300 ms after stimulus onset (Kelly & O’Connell, 2013; Polanía, Krajbich, Grueschow, & Ruff, 2014; Twomey, Murphy, Kelly, & O’Connell, 2015; Wyart, de Gardelle, Scholl, &…”
BackgroundFeuerriegel, D., Murphy, M., Konski, A., Mepani, V., Sun, J., Hester, R., & Bode, S. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.22.469610 · Cited by 3
Multimodal investigations of human face perception in neurotypical and autistic adultsPreprint
Wang, S., Sun, S., Cao, R., Kar, K., & Yu, H. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4g872 · Cited by 2
Catecholaminergic neuromodulation and selective attention jointly shape perceptual decision makingPreprint
Nuiten, S. A., de Gee, J. W., Fahrenfort, J. J., & van Gaal, S. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.87022.1 · Cited by 2
Sustained EEG responses to rapidly unfolding stochastic sounds reflect precision trackingPreprint
Zhao, S., Skerritt-Davis, B., Elhilali, M., Dick, F., & Maria Chait, A. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.08.574691 · Cited by 2
Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposurePreprint
Walsh, K. S., McGovern, D. P., Dully, J., Kelly, S. P., & O’Connell, R. G. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.91135.2 · Cited by 2
Self-citationDistinct brain mechanisms support trust violations, belief integration, and bias in human-AI teamsPreprint
Roeder, L., Hoyte, P., Kerr, G., Bruza, P., & van der Meer, J. N. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.16.670645 · Cited by 1
Catecholaminergic neuromodulation and selective attention jointly shape perceptual decision-making
Nuiten, S. A., de Gee, J. W., Zantvoord, J. B., Fahrenfort, J. J., & van Gaal, S. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.87022.3 · Cited by 1
Ueno, T., Kumano, H., & Uka, T. (2024) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-024-06862-3 · Cited by 1
“Recently, such decision-related activity has been measured in humans via electroencephalography (EEG) (O’Connell et al. 2012; Kelly and O’Connell 2013, 2015; Loughnane et al. 2016).”
BackgroundMethodShared Patterns of Cognitive Control Behavior and Electrophysiological Markers in Adolescence
Wiker, T., Alnæs, D., Pedersen, M. L., Norbom, L. B., Boer, O. D., Kjelkenes, R., Voldsbekk, I., Karl, V., Bukhari, S. H., Moberget, T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02272 · Cited by 1
Biabani, M., Walsh, K. S., Zhou, S.-H., Wagner, J., Johnstone, A., Paterson, J., Johnson, B. P., Matthews, N. L., Loughnane, G. M., O’Connell, R. G., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0469-24.2025 · Cited by 3
Self-citationXu, Q., Wang, J., Wang, J., & Li, P. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121282 · Cited by 1
“Some ERP components such as centroparietal positivity (CPP) have been linked to evidence accumulation processes (O ’ Connell et al., 2012; Kelly and O ’ Connell, 2013), offering insights into information integration in social decision-making.”
Common neural choice signals reflect accumulated evidence, not confidence
Desender, K., de Smet, A.-S., Erdil, D., Gunay, E. M., Visser, Y. F., Denmat, P. L., & Marcke, H. V. (2025) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaf257 · Cited by 2
He, H., & Chi, L. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111341 · Cited by 1
Neural decision dynamics underlying reinforcement learning and working memory
Pedersen, M. L., Frogner, E. R., Westlye, L. T., & Moberget, T. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115471 · Cited by 1
“15,16,29 Our analysis revealed that CPP amplitude varied systematically with drift rate estimates from the RLWM-LBA model, such that lower drift rates were associated with prolonged and slower CPP buildup and lower peak amplitudes.”
Yang, H., Ding, D., Qin, H., Miao, H., Wang, C., Zang, Y., Chi, L., & Wu, B. (2026) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/s12993-026-00344-y · Cited by 1
“At the decision-readout level, the centro-parietal positivity (CPP) has been established as a supramodal “accumulation-to-bound” signal whose slope and amplitude closely track RT and subjective confidence across tasks [6, 22, 29].”
InfluentialFrom perception to appraisal: Brain responses to natural and built features in urban environments
Zähme, C., Sander, I., Koselevs, A., Kühn, S., & Gramann, K. (2026) · Brain and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.braen.2026.100028 · Cited by 1
The late positive component in recognition memory is linked to mnemonic evidence accumulation
Sun, J., Feuerriegel, D., Nightingale, M., & Osth, A. F. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1389 · Cited by 3
“First, in contrast to the LPC, the CPP shows a slower build-up of amplitude that onsets earlier relative to the motor response in trials with slower as compared to faster RTs ( Feuerriegel et al., 2021; Fong et al., 2025; Kelly & O’Connell, 2013).”
Exploring the unknown: electrophysiological and behavioural measures of visuospatial learning
Quinlivan, B., Butler, J. S., Ridwan, A. R., Beiser, I., Williams, L., McGovern, E. M., O’Riordan, S., Hutchinson, M., & Reilly, R. B. (2016) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13195 · Cited by 1
“Recent studies continue to demonstrate how our understanding of these components can continue to evolve through the development of specific and well-designed experimental protocols (O’Connell et al., 2012; Kelly & O’Connell, 2013; Twomey et al., 2015).”
BackgroundElectrophysiological Correlates of Response Time in a Vigilant Attention Task
Toth, J., Patel, R., & Arvaneh, M. (2022) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871442 · Cited by 1
Signatures of time interval reproduction in the human electroencephalogram (EEG)
McCone, H., Butler, J. S., & O’Connell, R. G. (2024) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00279 · Cited by 4
Self-citationWongtrakun, J., Zhou, S.-H., Bellgrove, M. A., Chong, T. T. ‐., & Coxon, J. P. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2079-23.2024 · Cited by 2
Sampling from Internal and External Sensations Guides Decision-Making
Koevoet, D., & Arora, K. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1255-24.2024 · Cited by 1
Understanding Drivers’ Steering Behavior: Chain And One-Time Corrections
Dinparastdjadid, A., Lee, J. D., Schwarz, C., Brown, T. L., & Gunaratne, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621423 · Cited by 1
“Sequential sampling models allow us to describe the process of how humans make accurate perceptual decisions in the presence of sensory noise (Kelly & O’Connell, 2013).”
BackgroundAnders, R., van Maanen, L., & Alario, F. ‐. (2019) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2019.1610371 · Cited by 1
Hramov, A. E., Koronovskii, A. A., Makarov, V. A., Maksimenko, V., Павлов, А. Н., & Sitnikova, E. (2021) · Springer series in synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75992-6_8 · Cited by 1
Representations of evidence for a perceptual decision in the human brainPreprint
Bitzer, S., Park, H., Maeß, B., von Kriegstein, K., & Kiebel, S. J. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/350876 · Cited by 1
Stimulus reliability automatically biases temporal integration of discrete perceptual targetsPreprint
Rangelov, D., West, R. K., & Mattingley, J. B. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/841353 · Cited by 1
“course of evidence accumulation: specifically, its amplitude builds up gradually, the build-up slope is proportional to stimulus quality, and it is observed even in the absence of overt responses (11,12,41).”
BackgroundMethodA neural turning point - the EEG P3 component tracks unfolding changes of mindPreprint
Parés-Pujolràs, E., Hatchuel, J., & Haggard, P. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.18.388363 · Cited by 3
Azizi, Z. R., Zabbah, S., Jahanitabesh, A., & Ebrahimpour, R. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.20.449145 · Cited by 2
Schiffer, A., Boldt, A., Waszak, F., & Yeung, N. (2017) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/mtus8 · Cited by 2
Sensorimotor decisions rely on the entanglement of evidence and motor accumulation processesPreprint
Verdonck, S., Loossens, T., & Philiastides, M. G. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.16.492075 · Cited by 1
“4b) is consistent with the spatial distribution of centroparietal EEG signals implicated previously in the process of evidence accumulation (O’Connell et al., 2012; Kelly & O’Connell, 2013a; Philiastides et al., 2014).”
BackgroundResultPearce, D. J., Loughnane, G. M., Chong, T. T. ‐., Demeyere, N., Mattingley, J. B., Moore, M. J., New, P. W., O’Connell, R. G., O'Neill, M., Rangelov, D., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.12.12.571233 · Cited by 1
Self-citationScaramozzino, F., McKay, R., & Nicholas Furl, A. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.03.14.24304279 · Cited by 1
“In RDM, neural firing-rates in the lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of monkeys 47–49 and the central parietal positivity (CPP) in humans 50,51 show a similar pattern: they ramp up during evidence accrual until they reach a peak and dampen after the decision is taken.”
BackgroundParés-Pujolràs, E., Kelly, S. P., & Murphy, P. R. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.15.594345 · Cited by 1
Self-citationNeural and Behavioural Correlates of Variance of Sensory EvidencePreprint
Harris, A. M. M., Esmaily, J., Lefebvre, G., Navajas, J., & Bahrami, B. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.17.665271 · Cited by 1
“The work of Kelly and O’Connell (2013) (Kelly & O'Connell, 2013) has been particularly influential in establishing centroparietal positivity (CPP) as a robust index of evidence accumulation, demonstrating that its build-up rate is proportional to the mean coherence, contrast, or amplitude of…”
A Common Neural Signal of Evidence Accumulation for Perceptual and Mnemonic DecisionsPreprint
Tsvinev, A., Pilipenko, A., Hausman, H. E., & Samaha, J. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.13.688140 · Cited by 1
“…decisions, evidence accumulation begins shortly after stimulus presentation and continuously builds as long as sensory evidence is available until a decision threshold is reached (Herding et al., 2019; Kelly & O’Connell, 2013; O’Connell et al., 2012; Shadlen & Shohamy, 2016; Twomey et al., 2015).”
InfluentialDistinct brain mechanisms support trust violations, belief integration, and bias in human-AI teamsPreprint
Roeder, L., Hoyte, P., Kerr, G., Bruza, P., & van der Meer, J. N. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.109058.1 · Cited by 1
Temporal Phase Differences Encode Tactile Motion from Static Vibrotactile InputsPreprint
Rezaei, E., & Adibi, M. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.24.701470 · Cited by 1
“…with human EEG studies showing a centroparietal decision signal whose buildup tracks evidence accumulation toward a bound (O’Connell et al., 2012; Kelly and O’Connell, 2013; Twomey et al., 2015), and with single-unit and computational studies implicating posterior parietal cortex in perceptual…”
Visuomotor Adaptation in Anisometropic Amblyopia: A Prism Adaptation Study
Sklar, J. C. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Kulashekhar, S. (2017) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
Modelling Movement as an Ongoing Decision
Wispinski, N. J. (2017) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3zc7s78h
Expectation in motor planning and execution
Weinberg, I. (2018) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Endogenicity and awareness in voluntary action
Parés-Pujolràs, E. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Rys, W. (2020) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)
Mechanisms of Value-Biased Prioritization in Fast Sensorimotor Decision Making
Afacan-Seref, K. (2020) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Visual Predictions Operate on Different Timescales
Darriba, Á., van Ommen, S., Hsu, Y., & Waszak, F. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01711
Early effects of recollection memory on viewing behavior during visual associative recognitionPreprint
O'Young, D., & Voss, J. L. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zuvw3
Neural dynamics of cue reliability in perceptual decisionsPreprint
Mancuso, G., & Plomp, G. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/87ksu
Fleming, S. M. (2019) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.734068306.793559296
Catecholaminergic neuromodulation and selective attention jointly shape perceptual decision-makingPreprint
Nuiten, S. A., de Gee, J. W., Zantvoord, J. B., Fahrenfort, J. J., & van Gaal, S. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.11.03.515022
“Note that we have transformed the EEG data to current source density (CSD) to sharpen the spatial sensitivity of our EEG results, which is suggested to be optimal for CPP analyses ( Kelly and O’Connell, 2013 ; non- CSD-transformed topographic maps can be observed in Figure 3—figure supplement 1 ).”
MethodAngulo, R., Cipriani, G. A., Carboni, A., & Kessel, D. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01825-9
“…averaging, given that recent studies have proposed this method as a promising and, in some cases, more accurate alternative (e.g., Berchicci et al., 2016; Johnson et al., 2003; Kelly & O’Connell, 2013; O’Connell et al., 2012; Saville et al., 2011; Twomey et al., 2015; Verleger et al., 2005).”
O’Connell, R. G. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.87022.1.sa2
Self-citationNuiten, S. A., De Gee, J. W., Fahrenfort, J. J., et al. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.87022.1.sa0
Nuiten, S. A., De Gee, J. W., Fahrenfort, J. J., et al. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.87022.1.sa1
Takács, E. (2019) · Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem · doi:10.15476/elte.2019.193
Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposurePreprint
Walsh, K. S., McGovern, D. P., Dully, J., Kelly, S. P., & O’Connell, R. G. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.15.549123
Self-citationOğuz, O. Ç., Aydın, B., & Ürgen, B. A. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.16.558064
“18 FC3 and FC4) in line with the previous literature (Kelly and O’Connell, 2013).”
ResultOğuz, O. Ç., Aydın, B., & Ürgen, B. A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4595129
Dynamic reduction of neural uncertainty regulates perceptual decisions in a Bayes-optimal mannerPreprint
Rangelov, D., Bitzer, S., & Mattingley, J. B. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3409042/v1
Catecholaminergic neuromodulation and selective attention jointly shape perceptual decision-makingPreprint
Nuiten, S. A., de Gee, J. W., Zantvoord, J. B., Fahrenfort, J. J., & van Gaal, S. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.87022.2
Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposurePreprint
Walsh, K. S., McGovern, D. P., Dully, J., Kelly, S. P., & O’Connell, R. G. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.91135.1
Self-citationShared patterns of cognitive control behaviour and electrophysiological markers in adolescencePreprint
Wiker, T., Alnæs, D., Pedersen, M. L., Norbom, L. B., Boer, O. D., Kjelkenes, R., Voldsbekk, I., Karl, V., Bukhari, S. H., Moberget, T., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jcbde
Enhancing altruism by electrically augmenting frontoparietal gamma-band phase couplingPreprint
Hu, J., Moisa, M., & Ruff, C. C. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.01.587528
“…et al., 2023), and with the well-documented role of parietal regions in evidence accumulation processes underlying nonsocial (Brosnan et al., 2020; Kelly & O’Connell, 2013) and social decision making (Hu et al., 2023; Pisauro et al., 2017; Polanía et al., 2014; Yao et al., 2020; Zhong et al.,…”
BackgroundLin, Y.-S., Billington, J., Srinivasan, A. R., Leonetti, M., & Markkula, G. M. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/h5qwa
Algısal Karar Verme Süreçleri Çerçevesinde İnsan Hareketlerini Tanıma
Urgen, B. A., & Evsen, Ş. (2024) · Ayna Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi · doi:10.31682/ayna.1344345
The interactions between spontaneous thoughts and decision-making in the context of depression
Yang, H. (2024) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.1030953542
Age-related differences in working memory subprocesses decomposed by the reference-back paradigmPreprint
Gaál, Z. A., Nagy, B., Czigler, I., Csizmadia, P., Petró, B., & Kojouharova, P. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.04.602161
Posterior ERP tracks evidence accumulation for memory-based decisions.Preprint
Fukuda, K., Printzlau, F. A. B., Kang, M.-S., & Woodman, G. F. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/28j7s
Pereira‐Morales, A. J., Ramírez-Cortázar, F., Mayorga, M. F. R., & Eslava-Schmalbach, J. H. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06799-4
“The process of accumulating sensory information is known as evidence accumulation (EA) (Kelly & O’Connell, 2013 ; Polanía et al., 2014 ).”
Re-thinking the Prediction of Construction Hazard Identification Based on Multimodal Data
Wang, J., Liu, M., Liang, M., & Liao, P. (2024) · Lecture notes in operations research · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1949-5_128
Electrophysiological correlates of selective speech adaptation
Stekelenburg, J. J., Limpens, J., Baart, M., & Vroomen, J. (2025) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105545
“However, it is doubtful whether the late ERP effects are similar to the CPP because the CPP has its maximum at the central-parietal electrodes (Kelly & O ’ Connell, 2013; Tagliabue et al., 2019) and its neural source within the parietal and frontal lobes (Philiastides et al., 2014), whereas in our…”
Perceptual glimpses are locally accumulated and globally maintained at distinct processing levelsPreprint
Parés-Pujolràs, E., Geuzebroek, A. C., O’Connell, R. G., & Kelly, S. P. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.04.30.651428
“Occipital Alpha-band power has been linked to attention and temporal expectations (Rohenkohl & Nobre, 2011), and also to the onset (Van Den Brink et al., 2021) and build-up rate (Kelly & O’Connell, 2013) of evidence accumulation signals like the CPP.”
InfluentialSelf-citationTarget Selection Signals Causally Influence Human Perceptual Decision-Making
Pearce, D. J., Loughnane, G. M., Chong, T. T. ‐., Demeyere, N., Mattingley, J. B., Moore, M. J., New, P. W., O’Connell, R. G., O'Neill, M., Rangelov, D., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2048-24.2025
“Using a bilateral variant of the random dot motion task (Kelly and O’Connell, 2013; Loughnane et al., 2016; Newman et al., 2017; Brosnan et al., 2020) we looked at whether contralesional slowing of response time (RT) in stroke patients would be related to a disruption in the dynamics of early…”
Self-citationLee, H., Lim, J., & Lee, S. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112844 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, S. P., & O'Connell, R. G.
- Affiliations
- City College of New York (US)
- ORCID
- Kelly, Simon P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-12-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 19434-19441
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6618757
- OpenAlex
- W2119976941
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- sensory evidence accumulation, sequential sampling, decision variables, motion coherence, temporal integration, boundary crossing, reaction time, alpha activity, attentional fluctuations, motor preparation, perceptual decision making
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Neurological, Reaction Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review