Cited by 51Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Combining fMRI and behavioral measures to examine the process of human learning

Open access
Karuza, Elisabeth A., Emberson, Lauren L., Aslin, Richard N.·2014·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Prior to the advent of fMRI, the primary means of examining the mechanisms underlying learning were restricted to studying human behavior and non-human neural systems. However, recent advances in neuroimaging technology have enabled the concurrent study of human behavior and neural activity. We propose that the integration of behavioral response with brain activity provides a powerful method of investigating the process through which internal representations are formed or changed. Nevertheless, a review of the literature reveals that many fMRI studies of learning either (1) focus on outcome rather than process or (2) are built on the untested assumption that learning unfolds uniformly over time. We discuss here various challenges faced by the field and highlight studies that have begun to address them. In doing so, we aim to encourage more research that examines the process of learning by considering the interrelation of behavioral measures and fMRI recording during learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.012

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karuza, E. A., Emberson, L. L., & Aslin, R. N.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
  • Karuza, Elisabeth A.
  • Emberson, Lauren L.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
109
Pages
193-206
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125816069
Cited by
50
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1k99hd076166-01a1)
  • National Eye Institute (P30EY001319)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD-37082, K99 HD-076166, R01HD037082)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
learning process, internal representations, neural mechanisms of learning
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Psychomotor Performance, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review